Square self-organized activities by the city management to collect venue fees why is considered to be occupying the road? According to relevant reports, it is because the plaza was officially handled by the owner of the corresponding activities. When the city management passes through to carry out the corresponding punishment, but the punishment is too strong, charged a sky-high occupancy fee. Therefore, the people were dissatisfied, this matter also triggered the discussion of public opinion. So in the end, the square self-organized activities by the city management to collect venue fees is a kind of occupation of business performance? I think it depends on the amount of departure in the end. For the corresponding amount of punishment, on the side of the demonstration of its different strength of punishment. Therefore, we can judge whether it is a manifestation of squatting or not according to the strength of the penalty.
If the city management is charging a sky-high site occupation fee, that is to say, the city management utilizes its own authority to charge a large amount of site occupation fee. Such use of one's own authority to seek profiteering is a kind of is a manifestation of violation of professional ethics. Therefore, if the site occupation fee charged is high enough, it means that the city management is occupying the site. City management is a public official of city management. Should be adhering to the goal of improving the appearance of the city, the face of the city. Not unauthorized use of their authority to seek certain benefits of the profession. City management also belongs to a kind of police, police in people's mind has been a noble profession. Therefore, the city manager doing so would only be considered as over-utilizing his power rather than maintaining the stability of the society.
If the site occupation fee charged by the city management is slightly so much higher than the normal processing fee. Then it is actually acceptable because the organizer's private use of public resources for their own affairs has led to an illegal phenomenon. This is counterproductive to the stable development of society. Therefore, the city management charges a little more than the reason for charging a fee can warn people not to violate the relevant laws and regulations.
Whether it is the city management or the organizer of the event, we have to go through the amount of money for the appropriate measure. This is how we know whether the city management has the claim of occupying the road. But for so many organizers, what we are criticizing is that the organizers of the event are privately occupying public resources for their own private activities.