Some people say that the ratio of male to female teachers needs to be improved, do you think it is necessary?

In the education system, female teachers are more. But there are not a few lying flat, I see the female teacher style is, classroom teacher that is really able to be, the results that is completely with a good, open class that is called a wonderful, to get a June 1, singing and dancing, we male teachers can not look forward to.? The system of female teachers, although there are some relations, but the most or ordinary workers, basically there is no lying flat sitting in the office to drink tea. There isn't much physical work in this line of work for us men to top up, either. So I admire them from the bottom of my heart anyway, even though they can't look at male teachers when looking for a relationship .

Reasonable, good grades, approachable, and public classes that make a difference. More female teachers is more...? We male teachers also have advantages, I feel that the average school has two male teachers, that are used as drinking main training, and the average male also tends to go career, slowly into the school board team and so on. This is not to say that when the leader is a male, but the school leader to make good relations with the top, reception leaders, a variety of inspections, very cumbersome, need to socialize, female teachers generally tend to be quiet, quiet drop teaching and educating people. And then there is teaching sports, playing basketball and so on.

So, teaching is a very suitable profession for women, and the majority of women are also very dedicated, there seems to be little need to think about changing the ratio of men to women. For what purpose should it be raised? Just to raise it for the sake of raising it? As for why there are fewer male teachers, don't you get it? Teachers are poor. In general, some aspiring men are thinking of going out to make a lot of money, even if you want to be stable, that also went to become a civil servant, the rest of us do not want to be too ambitious, other than the test can not be, then the test of a teacher, we are all so all the way through the test, if the civil service test, who will be a teacher ah, of course, does not exclude a few who want to dedicate themselves to the education of the I would like to call it an angel.

As for the female teachers, it is also the case that the social requirements for men will be a bit higher, because they have to buy a house and a car, and the pressure is great, and the teaching position obviously can't satisfy this point. And for women, maybe the job is stable and the social evaluation is not low enough...? Then you say you think it is useful to raise the ratio of men to women, or unnecessary, instead of that, it is better to raise the treatment. When will the treatment be improved to the point that people feel that our male teachers are the meat and potatoes, naturally, everyone tends to rush. Now even female teachers are not willing to marry poor male teachers, you say how to improve the ratio of male to female teachers.