How to evaluate the square dance grandparents and young people grab the basketball court event

A few days ago, the attention of netizens, triggered public opinion heatedly discusses the Henan Luoyang Wangcheng Park basketball court square dance moncler outlet and basketball young people to fight for the venue, in the coordination of the relevant departments, there has been a solution: the basketball court back to the guys playing, moncler outlet, the grandparents to look for another place to dance. On this matter, the essence of the exposure of two issues, one is the dispute over whether the right is compatible with the virtues, and the second is to ask the wisdom of the city public **** management. At present, across the urban and rural borders and regional boundaries of the square dance, has become an unstoppable trend. Whether it is to meet the fitness, exercise needs of the elderly, or for the elderly to provide social interaction, social integration channels, or for them to find access to self-identity, social identity and even the realization of the value of the channel, the rise of square dance, rooted in it to meet the people's diversified, personalized spiritual and cultural aspirations. In the diversification of interests, diversified values today, square dance "turf war" endless, increasingly intense. The reason for this is that public **** space has the basic attributes of openness and **** enjoyment, and it is very easy to encounter the "tragedy of the commons" and be over-exploited and over-utilized. Basketball court as a public **** space, in the absence of young people to play ball when the square dance grandparents can also be used. However, when young people want to use the basketball court, these square dancers should back off. After all, the basketball court as a public **** space, but also to achieve the optimal allocation of resources. Alienation of the basketball court for the square, obviously not make the best use of things, not play basketball court should be used. Square dance "turf war" or, bus, subway, forcing young people to give up their seats, are essentially a lack of awareness of the rules under the "moral bondage" - fuzzy! The boundary between morality and law, abuse of morality as a "weapon of the weak". This kind of "I am weak, I have reason" seems to be quite persuasive, but in fact can not stand the legal reasoning. Although they can find a variety of reasons for misbehavior even self-deceiving excuses, can not be ignored that its essence is a kind of "turtledove".