Featured Debate Essay 600 Words Roundup Ten
In weekday study, work and life, everyone has written essays, right? Essays can be categorized into time-limited essays and non-time-limited essays according to the time limit for writing. Then you know a good essay how to write? The following is my debate essay 600 words 10, for your reference and reference, I hope it can help the friends in need.
Debate Essay 600 Words Part 1
The debate is going to start in the afternoon, and it's going to be a wonderful and exciting match. By noon I couldn't sit still, I was like a puppet on a string, so excited that I kept talking and moving around. When my best friend saw me like this, she begged for mercy, "Please, be quiet for a while, I have to memorize the debate!" I looked at her serious look and had to sit down. But I still couldn't control my excitement.
Which side will win? The first is a good idea. It is possible, because "open the book is beneficial" is originally a idiom, since ancient times, open the book is beneficial to a lot of references. There may be, because this is a group of two against three or four groups, three or four groups of eloquent students, can be said to be strong as a forest. When I was thinking about it, the game began, the teacher wrote on the blackboard six big strong words: open the book is beneficial.
The positive side of the Chen Qianqian began to give the negative side to a downward spiral: "I advocate open books are beneficial, often read books can increase insight, broaden the horizons of the old saying: 'people can not eat meat for three days, can not be one day not read.'" The opposite side did not react for a moment, waited for a while, the opposite side of the Liu Yinggang stood up, said: "Then we are reading every day!" Chen Qianqian immediately picked up, "Thank you to the other side's defense for arguing our point." The class roared with laughter, Liu Yinggang realized that he had helped, also could not help but laugh.
The debate continued, when the positive side cited several examples of celebrities, the interesting scene once again, the opposite side of the Zhu Jiali and Yang Dan at the same time stood up, said in unison: "Ma Su familiar with the book of war, talking about the art of war head is the way ...... "The class laughed again. This time even the teacher could not help but laugh, I even laughed out of tears, thinking: "They are not the same person, growing different heads, how can they say the same sentence? Is this the heart of the heart?"
In the laughter, the debate ended. Who wins and who loses is not important, the important thing is that in the laughter we exercise the courage, exercise the eloquence, and know to read healthy and useful books, so that we can really open the book.
Debate essay 600 words Part 2
Gorky said: "Books are the ladder of human progress." How do I feel that this ladder is sometimes good and sometimes bad?
The teacher said, "On Teachers' Day, we will hold a debate titled: Is Opening Books Beneficial." Many students chose the positive side. If there is no one as the opposite side, then this debate can not be carried out. I was torn, for which I had to prepare both sides.
That afternoon I was lying in bed reading Pinocchio. I read the second chapter of the book: the little puppet ran out of the house alone, its dad chased after it, and the police stopped the little puppet on its way. The policeman stopped the puppet's way. The father criticized the puppet when he caught up with it, but the passers-by still pointed their fingers at the father, and finally the father was sent to jail. Without his father's care, the little puppet was so hungry that he had to beg for food, but people often played pranks on him and poured cold water on him. Hungry and cold, he fell asleep by the fireplace and his legs were burned off. Papa came back, and when he saw what he saw, tears fell from his eyes. Re-do his feet, and stick seamlessly ...... from the story I read should listen to their parents, can not be allowed to follow their own nature, I found that "open the book is beneficial".
But I also think that sometimes "open books are not beneficial". I read the detective novel, read when very fascinated, to sleep at night when I feel a cool wind, from my back blowing, I feel very afraid, do not dare to sleep, really want to sleep in the middle of mom and dad. If I don't read that detective novel, I won't be afraid. And in the process of reading, we learned a lot of knowledge outside the text, but a lot of bad information also came in with it, such as some people read the book, learn the behavior of the bad guys in the book to commit crimes; some people are addicted to the story, do not want to make progress, do not want to learn.
Our class debate this time made me torn, but for the sake of the class eventually I chose the point of view: "open books may not be beneficial!" I don't know if I can win with such an unsharp point of view. Oh! I'm not sure if I can win with such an unstable point of view!
Debate Essay 600 Words Part 3"Open books are beneficial" seems to be an irrefutable truth, but there are people who are against it. In this regard, we carried out a unique debate, double fly pinpoint, wide-eyed, who refused to back down a step, depending on the opponents forced to the brink of extinction.
The first round of the contest began, first of all, there is the positive side of the 1 began to Chen, he said in the right words: "I think it is beneficial to open the books, because books are the ladder of human progress." Before the words fell, the cheerleaders and allies in the positive camp began to cheer: wah-ho, speaking too much sense, the first time to use the big move. Some of them even turned their heads and looked triumphantly at the anti-side allies, with a look that clearly said, "Look and see, you're bound to lose." Those comrades on the opposite side were so angry that their teeth were about to fall out.
But the result seems to be out of our expectation, only to see the opposite side of the 1st defender replied unhurriedly: "Yes, you're right, but there are good books and bad books, if you read bad books, do not also become bad? Ancient officialdom was full of readers, but why were most of them corrupt people? Isn't it still reading bad books? Once this statement was made, the "audience" immediately became silent, and everyone looked nervously at the positive side of the defense. The other side of the ally this time can be proud, head up high, straight to the positive players spit out their tongues.
But the positive players did not panic at all, said slowly: "Books are like medicine, good reading can cure stupidity. This sentence was written by the famous Liu Xiang, how do you explain it?" This statement can poke the key point, even Mr. Yu led the applause.
But before he could even finish his sentence, Lao Zhou, the number one king defender of the opposite side, jumped out,
and loudly questioned, "There are good medicine and poison, what if you drink poison?" This time, the applause was even louder, the classroom roof is almost overturned ......
The debate ended in this piece of laughter, the players and onlookers are not yet finished, after class are still discussing this content. Just should be an idiom: enjoy it.
Debate 600 words Part 4Today's language class is particularly lively, from the classroom from time to time out of the "positive side of the speech", "the opposite side of the speech" sound. The CCTV debate competition for college students has come to settle down here. It turns out that our class is holding a debate on "whether it is beneficial to open the book".
Bao Yang, the supporter, spoke first: "Let's start with the positive side." Xu Shu Xiaoxiao loudly recited "books have their own golden houses, books have their own Yan Ruyu." Xu Shuxiao recited a few quotes from the ancients about the benefits of opening a book. Lu Chang from our side also suppressed him with a few modern celebrities' sentences about how bad books are not beneficial. After all, Xu Shu Xiaoxiao is very eloquent, plus Lu Chang is easy to be nervous, facing Xu Shu Xiaoxiao stronger and stronger offense, Lu Chang seems to be a little hard to bear. At this point, Zhang Junjie stood up and expressed his views on the uselessness of bad books, but it was a big help, and Xu Shu Xiaoxiao forced us into a "difficult to buy bad books" dead end. Seeing that there is no way out, I do not care too much, directly stood up, I bypassed the "difficult to buy bad books" dead corner, pointed out that the feudal superstitions and other books are still on the hall of elegance, followed by the example of the "immortal" wife "killed her husband by magic". I then cited the example of the "wife of a great immortal" who killed her husband by magic. The other side was not willing to show weakness, they said that Buddhism and other religious beliefs are not wrong. This can be lively, we say that feudal superstition is not Buddhism, but a cult, they say that there are not many books on cults ....... The public said that the public is right, the mother-in-law said that the mother-in-law is right, the scene was thrown into confusion. Supporter Bao Yang shouted, "Silence! Silence!" Another hard knock on the pencil case to stop the farce.
Ark was the first to speak in the new round, pointing out that reading bad books is already a big lure to juvenile delinquency. We were about to applaud him, but his opponent was no slouch, and Shao Jingjing dismissed his argument seamlessly with a simple, "As long as you have restraint, you won't commit a crime." Seamlessly dismissing Ark's argument. I took over the conversation and turned it around, saying that Japanese comics are harmful to young people, and now we've found a breakthrough. We attacked in force and were about to win, when again Shao Jingjing's line, "Manga can increase imagination when read properly." The opponents are in a desperate situation. Xu Shuxiao's line, "The opposing side also reads comic books." The other side also reads comic books.
People often say: "open the book is beneficial". There are also people who say: "opening a book may not be beneficial". For the view of this issue, our class on Tuesday organized a debate among students. The debate was moderated by Zhenqing and me. As the competition was about to begin, the students were all excited and eager to try.
The first to appear is the positive side of the first defense Xinyuan, only to see her "rubbing" to stand up, eloquent speech, first in the momentum of the first to take the lead. She quoted from the classics, the benefits of reading a lot of books to talk about the head, the beginning of the other side to a "downward spiral".
Immediately followed by the opposition, the first defense Iwamoto, don't look at his small size, but speak up with reason and evidence, a good idea. He quoted, the open book reading may bring the bad one by one, clear thinking, in the "crisis" do not panic, let people have respect.
With the excellence of the two sides, everyone expressed their views. "The smell of gunpowder" more and more intense, the classroom "smoke". The two of us are not the only ones who have been in the same boat for a long time. I was so impressed by the intensity of the debate that I also began to rub my hands.
But taking into account their own host identity, I had to summarize the way to express my "neutral" point of view: since ancient times, people think that "open books are beneficial", which of course has its own reasons. Open book reading can not only accumulate knowledge, learn good words and sentences. You can also learn from the book to life skills and human reasoning, really benefit a lot, why not? But on the other hand, think about it: although the books can open up the horizons, but also "open book may not be all good", if you read those unhealthy books, was led to the evil way, go into the fire, or perhaps to the abyss of the crime, it is not worth the loss ah.
Soon, the debate will come to an end. Our eloquent "warriors" are still not finished. They have a sword in their mouths, arguing red in the face, it is difficult to distinguish between winners and losers. It seems that both sides are equal! In the end, the teacher had to judge a best debater, and the real meaning of the two sides are difficult to distinguish between the two sides.
Although this debate did not evaluate who is the champion, but we have learned from the learned a lot of things, harvested a lot of happiness. For this debate, my final opinion is: open the book is certainly beneficial. But the most important thing is to learn to distinguish right from wrong. More good books, is the life of a good teacher and a good friend.
The debate was a great success, really wonderful!
Debate essay 600 words Part 6The small reporter has a public service activities "give me a lawyer dream - climbing far small lawyer activities."
Hearing, immediately happy to sign up, not long after, I received a notice, I successfully enrolled in this activity, I jumped up and down with joy.
When I got there, I wrote my personal report and started. I received two questions, 1: Who do you think the New Year's money should go to. In fact, I have thought about this question, just sometimes did not think too much, to our own, we can say because this money is the adult said to us, naturally our own, of course, I am also considering giving adults, so to speak: because this is an adult to give someone else, someone else to give you, so that's why this should be given to the adults, and so I chose to give us. I said, "What is said to be for us is naturally our own." However the other person also followed my inference and said, "Adults give to others before others give to you, so that's why this has to be given to adults." The student next to me argued, "This money is the meaning of courtesy, so of course it has to be given to us!" "But if adults don't give money to others, will they give it to you?" As soon as the words were out of his mouth, a classmate picked up "......" "......." A sound in the classroom rang and rang, I gradually smelled the smoke in the classroom, this can really war of words ah!
The 2nd question was: what would you do if you were stuck on a train track with a track-changing
button in your hand, but the track that the button led to was tied to an old man, and there were children tied to the other one. I first removed the child, because the child is the smallest and has the longest life, so he doesn't deserve to die. And now I considered whether I should die myself or the old man, the old man's words because his life was at an end, and mine was still long, but the car was coming toward me, and who was I to change the fate of others? So I said, "The car is coming towards me, so who am I to change the fate of others? So I think it should be for me to die." When I said that, surprisingly, everyone agreed!
After it was over, the teachers gave us little lawyer's cards, and we got them and took a picture with the lawyer I was all smiles and happy.
At this time, I must feel that this is my happiest moment.
On Tuesday afternoon, in the third class, our class was in an uproar, and there was a lot of laughter. Why is this? Because our class was holding a wonderful debate.
After the moderator introduced the rules, the two sides started a fierce debate. The theme of the debate is "should primary school students have access to cell phones". The positive point of view is that "elementary school students should have access to cell phones", and the negative point of view is that "elementary school students should not have access to cell phones". With the teacher's order, a tense and intense debate began, only to see both sides of the defense as a standby soldier, all eager to try, valiant, high momentum, while they seem to have a plan.
First by the positive side of the first defense began to speak. She said, "We, the positive side, think that elementary school students can have access to cell phones. Because there are benefits of using cell phones. There are a lot of software on the cell phone that can help us study, such as 'work together', 'homework help' and so on. Not only that, but cell phones also have the function of taking pictures, which can record the good 'moments." The pro-defender speaks in a colorful way. Then how should the opposite side refute it? Just see the first defense of the opposing side said colorfully, "We think elementary school students shouldn't have access to cell phones. Because there are a lot of online games on cell phones, many students are addicted to them and stay up late to play them. This hurts their eyes and affects their studies." After she finished, the class immediately rang with applause. Then, the second and third defense by the positive and negative side to speak. Just see them "arguing" very much, and they are not equal to each other. They just "noisy" finished, began a free debate, only to see the students one by one to take turns, scrambling to speak, like birds fighting for food, afraid that there is no their own share. The most interesting thing is that a student even asked the positive side: "You have not been in contact with the cell phone since childhood?" It made us all laugh. The students will help the positive side to speak, a moment to help the opposite side to speak, to the end of the class, the students and the debaters are blushing, really like a group of full "small pepper".
The debate is over, this is a wonderful and funny debate. I like this debate, I really hope to participate in more debates in the future.
Debate Composition 600 words Part 8"This debate let's talk about Ding Jinhao in more than 3,000 years of ancient Egyptian historical relics engraved on the 'Ding Jinhao to this place' this matter, do you think we should understand him? Let's start discussing about it!"
As soon as Mr. Lin's words fell, everyone raised their hands, "The positive side starts first!" Mr. Lin said, first of all, the positive side of Liu Xianzi jumped ahead of the courteous, "We should forgive him! Everyone should have a forgiving heart." "No! Should not be forgiven.1, the interests of the motherland are above everything.2, he has disgraced our country.3, confessed his faults when his parents were face to face and took the initiative to admit his faults, but he didn't step forward to take the responsibility.4, ...... "Liu Zihe of the opposite side worshipped the Buddha with one hand, and danced in the air while impassionedly said. "Where did a monk come from!" The teacher said wryly, and the students laughed their bellies off. I was thinking: what should I say again?
"You think, if there is a flower, seven petals, if I pick one of the petals, this flower can not be ten perfect, the motherland is like this flower, Ding Jinhao is one of the petals, that is to say, if we keep scolding him, this petal will wither, the world is not complete." Great, said Liu Yao Chen from our positive side while thinking. Liu Xianzi added, "They all cried when they admitted their mistakes too, so if we keep blaming him, we'll be adding to our own mistakes!" Really good at retorting, my heart finally calmed down.
"Although, they did cry, but crying can't solve all the problems! Is it rare that everyone who made a mistake cried and solved it?" Yu Zhiyue from the opposite side stood up and said emotionally. I thought about it and thought it made sense.
We continue to "lip wood warehouse tongue war" ......
The debate ended, but my mind is still in the scene, I concluded: I can not be guilty of this, he is an example, and to treat the mistake. I can't be too strict, and I can't be too loose.
Debate essay 600 words Part 9"The theme of this debate is - whether the opening of the book is beneficial, the requirements of this debate is to hold their own views, the two sides respect each other, but also to convince people with reason. Good, now please the positive side of the first debater--Jiang Yumeng to express the opinion of the positive side." Mr. Xi announced from the stage, and a fierce debate match kicked off.
Jiang Yumeng jumped up from his seat with a whoosh, and looked around at the opposing side as if he had already won, as if he was going to eat us up. What are you so proud of? We haven't even won yet! "The benefit of opening a book is what Song Taizu said ------" She said with confidence, I really worry that Cao Yun will not be able to recruit and teach. Jiang Yumeng has not yet sat down, our opposing side of the defense Cao Yun immediately stood up to refute: "Some unhealthy books will make many young people go on the road of crime after reading ------" It seems that my worries are superfluous, Cao Yun said the head of the road. "Those who read bad books and go on the road to crime are not in the right mind ------" Qu Zilin of the positive side spoke at length. Bad heart, I muttered, that doesn't necessarily mean everyone has a bad heart! Ha! I've found her loophole. I should give them a good run for their money during the free debate.
The next is more intense free debate time, the two sides face each other, the classroom is full of gunpowder flavor, the war is about to start. "We believe that the open book must be beneficial ------" the positive side of the debaters sat down, Cao Yun immediately "counter-argument" "There are a lot of unhealthy books on the market, this is also considered beneficial ------ "We have a sword, you do not let me, I do not let you, you a word I argued, the war has entered a white-hot stage. "Is it the knife's fault if a person with a knife slashes people in the street?" Tao Chenqi aggressive words so that we can not cope with a little bit, look at the positive side is about to raise eyebrows, fortunately, Dong Yifan blocked the wave of "flood" ------
Finally, the teacher made a summary: "The two sides of the debate are well-prepared, reasoned and justified, our debate is very! The teacher summarized! But the purpose of this debate is to tell you what kind of "volume" you should open, and in the future, we have to be selective about the books we read!
We on the other side of the argument were well-prepared, well-founded, and had the upper hand, and we all cheered. The positive side, however, was like a defeated rooster, hanging its head in shame. This is really an unforgettable debate! Hearing this theme, most of the students are the same as me, think open book is beneficial, but there are many students think that open book must be beneficial, not yet wait for the start of the debate, the students have formed a camp, the war of words in the students have been playing. Each student is full of confidence, that their own views are correct, in the end in this debate which side will win it, after the game to see the results!
The fierce debate began! Only to see the eight main debaters are all ready, eager to bring their own side of the blessing of victory, determination to win on the "debate stage", but also from time to time to stare at the opponent, it seems to use their eyes to "kill" the opposing side. Debate began, only to see the positive side of the small Wang preemptive: "Our side think that the open book is beneficial, Du Fu said - read books to break ten thousand volumes, the pen as God, read ......." He spoke as if he was intoxicated, as if his words had become one with his. At this time, the opposite side of Jiang fidgety, quickly stood up, retorted: "Our side that open books may not be beneficial ......" From Jiang's language, reflecting the opposite side's no show of weakness, with strong reasons perfectly to the positive side back to the strike, at this time I can not help but think in my heart: "in the end, who can win and who can lose? The game is really getting interesting!" Suddenly, Xiao Guo from the positive side suddenly stood up and said with a strong voice: Our side thinks that opening a book is beneficial ...... When he finished, everyone purred and applauded Xiao Guo in their hearts. And all the people on the opposite side felt the pressure doubled. Just in this owes a word to me, the teacher stood out and said to everyone: "Whether it is the positive side or the negative side, ultimately it is a sentence: the book still need to read, but to choose good, useful books to read."
In this debate, I understand a truth: to learn to read selectively, to read good, useful books.
;