But these are imagined, the local real rural life how, or personally went to the people have the most to say, I happen to have a friend who has been to the North Korean countryside to study, which is the tourists can not be exposed to the opportunity, because in the group tour program, tourists see the rural life of its, when the heat of this is also real, but is the MAX version. Only in the local more extensive rural areas, the villagers' daily life is not so.
First of all, rural production is indeed the model we have used in the last century, the reason why so many years remain unchanged, not what stubborn, but by the limited resources. Instead of being self-sufficient, the villagers are earning a living, basically the same as the ordinary tourists visit in their itineraries, except that the villagers' living environment can be far worse than what they look like in the sample, and that enviable life in the last century is indeed a fact of life, except that it is now all a fiasco.
In convenient places, rural houses have been well planned, while some remote houses are much more dilapidated, and the sound of household appliances is not seen in the house. According to him, power supply is sometimes difficult in these areas, which is after all a place where resources are scarce; and there is no need to talk about cell phones. The government's response to the issue has been a major step forward, but it is still not a reality in many rural areas.
And the life of ordinary farmers, and our colorful contrast, they do not have a busy after the card game, there is no evening ringing the sky square dance music, or groups of three or five people working, or stop to look at the distance, nagging, and their transportation is very simple, only the bicycle, the still rugged dirt roads also limit the access to more transportation. In fact, this is exactly what many users aspire to live, not enough really to the reality of the scenario, you can stick to it?