Content preview:
Yes, it will be right if it goes to court; My worry is, what about the virtues that our nation has always advocated? Is it meaningless under the cold law? This kind of moral-related litigation judgment needs to be cautious, not only considering the consistent moral beliefs of the nation, but also being cautious about the moral degradation of our simple nation. Between national morality and personal grievances, we must first reflect the universal value of the former. 20 1 1.8.25
We have long since stopped advocating helping others. Social mutual trust has dropped to freezing point. Under the banner of the law, one case is confusing, and the truth is missing, let alone the truth. Between helping others and deceiving others, the public is at a loss and then upset.
The Nanjing "Peng Yu case" educated the public with the results and restrained the public's goodwill that might happen at any time. Tianjin "Xu Yunhe case" ruled that Xu Yunhe lost the case in the first instance and is currently in the second instance. In the face of facts, the law is helpless. The unreasonable reason of the court is that according to the judicial appraisal conclusion: "It is impossible to determine the contact part between the bus driven by Xu Yunhe and the human body, and it cannot be ruled out that the bus has contact with Wang Xiuzhi, nor can it be ruled out that the bus has no contact with Wang Xiuzhi."
I read this conclusion three or four times before I found it was almost nonsense. In particular, two "can't be excluded" are the same meaning. ...
Should be what you need.