This has a lot to do with the care of vulnerable groups, and the success of this type of incident claims are not a few cases, not to mention the question of who is right and who is wrong, at least some people have been successful in their claims, so the family to the owner of the claim, which is also a very normal situation, but whether it is able to get the support of the court, as well as the amount of compensation in the end, or to be specifically analyzed, specifically determined.
In fact, this incident is also very simple, is a neighborhood of an old man went out to exercise, on the way home to help the following electric car, and then the electric car fell to the ground, the old man also brought down. The old man is said to have been more than 90 years old, after the fall, resulting in soft tissue injuries to the head of the old man, the right leg is said to be fractured, go to the hospital for treatment cost more than 40,000 yuan.
And the old man's family believes that the treatment costs should be borne by the owner of the electric car, which is said to be suspected of illegal parking, and claimed that the electric car should be parked in a special garage, and should not be randomly placed on the side of the road, which affects the travel of other people, if the electric car can be parked, the old man did not have to fall down.
To be honest, this reason is a bit far-fetched, the old man's family put forward the compensation request, the owner of the electric car also refused, that although he parked the electric car on the side of the road, but in fact does not affect the pedestrians walking, if the old man does not go to help the electric car, I'm afraid that will not fall. It is said that the owner of the car was also tied to the old man fell surveillance video, through the video can be seen, the old man is old, but the lack of guardian accompanied by family members have an unshirkable responsibility.
Now proceed to this point, both sides of the word, certainly can not reach a settlement, and this kind of thing is also with the civil dispute, it is estimated that the old man's family will be sued to the court, the court may be filed, but it is estimated that the old man's family side is very difficult to win.
After all, from the occurrence of the whole incident, is the old man took the initiative to help the electric car, rather than the old man went through there, the electric car fell down and smashed the old man, if the old man has a guardian or do not go to touch the electric car, this kind of thing will not happen.
And the beginning of the article, I said the word disadvantaged, and not without reason. I once experienced an incident where I ate bully food, my house is a convenience store, and this young man was eating bully food next door, he came down from the second floor and stomped my house door plaque broken, according to the normal speaking, he should compensate me.
But after our next door caught him, reported to the police, the police is so with me said: "you can still use this repair, this matter even if it, fortunately your home plaque solid, if not solid, he stepped on your home plaque down to the fall, maybe you have to be responsible for it". At that time, I blew up, I said you as a police officer, talking is responsible, I now open the cell phone recording, you repeat what you just said, and finally he went, meaning to tell me what I want to do with me.
While in the end this matter is still unsettled, but at that time when I heard this, I was really very angry, so I can especially understand the mood of the owner, itself, he has no fault, and in the end, but in turn, to be held responsible, if the incident, the court ruled that he was compensated, it would be interesting.