The net red song "wind blowing" is suspected of plagiarizing the classic song, accompanied by the exact same I do not know when the retro style is popular. With the narrative of "Welcome to the 90s", the Netflix song "Big Wind Blowing" has become popular. The song was first popularized on a variety show called "Voice of God" performed by celebrity singers. Wang Herno was born in 1998. He used to be a vegetarian. Like many Internet celebrity singers before him, a song inspires a person. With its easy-to-understand lyrics and strong rhythm, "Big Wind Blowing" is perfect for today's youth, especially as background music for short videos. The song quickly became popular throughout the Internet,
but was then featured with a similar beat to MJ's classic album "BillieJean. Internet users compared the backing tracks of the two songs and realized that not only were they similar. It was exactly the same. There were also many echoes from netizens in the comments section. No wonder it sounds so familiar to steal. Copying someone is bad. If you have to copy, it's hard not to get caught. There were also fans who whitewashed him, saying that the song was originally adapted to fit the stage and could not be called theft. After the controversy, Wang Herno himself responded to the incident. It was consistent with what the fans said. He said the same thing in his response, saying that it wasn't stealing, but that the song was originally retro-styled. After a long discussion, can you explain to the "tribute"?
Obviously, this argument is not acceptable to all listeners. More importantly, if it's a tribute, why didn't you say so? If I haven't said it before, that's fine, why didn't the composers and arrangers write MJ's name? Admitting it only after being found out doesn't mean that the coffin wasn't seen and that there was no crying. The netizens had a good word for him: the whiter the wash, the faster the fall. Since it's been clarified, Wang Herno didn't mention the copyright issue throughout. Whether he was paying homage or stealing, he at least clarified the issue instead of going around discussing or talking about the most important things. Some fans continue to explain to him that copyright involves commercial issues. Now that we've discussed copyright,
Let's talk about what copyright is. Copyright is the right of the creator to: publish the work under his or her own name, pseudonym, or unsigned form; protect the integrity of the work; modify the published work; recover the published work by making a statement due to a change of opinion or other justifiable reason, but duly indemnify the publisher against damages; use the work through lawful channels in the form of publication, reproduction, broadcasting, performance, exhibition, filming, translation, or adaptation; obtain the use of the work by others; or obtain the use of the work by others. to use the work through legal channels in the form of publication, reproduction, broadcasting, performance, exhibition, filming, translation or adaptation; to receive financial remuneration for the use of the work by others. If the above rights are infringed, the author or other copyright owner has the right to demand the cessation of the infringement and compensation for damages The last is the right of the copyright owner to demand the cessation of the infringement,
and compensation for damages due to the financial rewards received by others for the use of the work. Wang Herno was obviously using someone else's work, so did he get a financial reward? Needless to say this! Not only Wang Herno, but also the hosts of the program are suspected of copyright infringement. To say a few more words, many of the Internet celebrity singers and popular Netflix songs that have appeared in recent years across the web have been stolen. It's no longer someone's problem, the rise of short films does breed many grassroots stars, but how many of them want to become popular in any way? I'm sure everyone knows this. Even more frightening is the usual reticence of certain parties to respond to the demands of a competitive marketplace. This is both unhelpful and worrying.