The mother-in-law ignored her family and gave all the masks to her relatives to save face, and her daughter-in-law said she would divorce when the epidemic ended.

The mother-in-law disregarded her family and gave all the masks to her relatives to save face. But the daughter-in-law said the epidemic is over on divorce, I think this is not appropriate, for the following reasons:

01, life should not be trivialized.

Mother-in-law in order to their own face, in spite of the family to the family only masks all give away , which is not right. First, the mother-in-law is too important to save face, face is more important than the health of the whole family; second, the mother-in-law may not realize the importance of epidemic prevention and control, she feels that she can not wear masks, masks should be given to those who "need" people. I don't think anyone would be happy with such a mother-in-law. Everyone has their own face, but face is not everything, and there are many more important things than face, such as the feelings of the family, health and so on. Third, the mother-in-law meddles in her son's life, she has no right to give away all the family's masks.

But even if the mother-in-law has a lot of wrong, this is just a small thing in life, daughter-in-law should not be because of this matter to the marriage under the "death warrant". Since the marriage, then the future will certainly have to face a lot of difficulties and friction, if this matter on the divorce, it is too hurt feelings! Therefore, I think she can be angry and say that her mother-in-law is wrong, but she should not ask for a divorce.

02, mother-in-law's behavior should not affect the couple's relationship.

Mother-in-law's behavior ultimately can only represent her own, not on behalf of her husband's thoughts, therefore, as a wife should not vent her dissatisfaction with her mother-in-law on her husband, which is very unfair. The mother-in-law gave the mask to someone else, the husband is also unaware of ah, what is his fault? If you want to force a connection, you can only say that the husband is the mother-in-law's own son, so you are angry. No matter what happens, this kind of blood relationship can't be broken, therefore, why are you angry?

The right thing to do , should be to talk to your husband about this matter, through the husband and mother-in-law's communication to solve the problem, in order to prevent this kind of thing from happening again. The person who accompanies you through your life is your husband, not your mother-in-law, so if you let your husband pay for your mother-in-law's unintelligent behavior, which will affect the couple's relationship, you can eat a big loss!

03, not impulsive divorce.

I believe that marriage is not a child's play, therefore, whether it is a marriage or a divorce, you should not make the decision easily. Marriage is protected by law because we respect it more. I am not in favor of flash marriages for the simple reason that flash marriages are impulsive actions. If you get flash-married now, there is a high probability that you will get flash-divorced afterwards. Young people are prone to act impulsively and emotionally, they will be moved by something at this point in time sigh, and may flip out again at the next point in time.

So, before we get married, we have to be tolerant enough of the other half, only tolerant enough to go a long way. Impulsive divorce is not right, divorce is very simple, a trip to the Civil Affairs Bureau will be able to do down, but impulsive divorce is easy to leave regret and regret. The relationship needs to be taken seriously, marriage is even more so ah