Does the development of e-commerce contribute more to the economy or the development of physical stores?

Time will prove that physical stores make a great contribution to the economy, and the industrial chain can provide more jobs, increase the flow of people in the city, make all industries prosperous, and the city more prosperous.

There are many benefits in physical stores. First of all, they can solve employment problems, and secondly, they can feel the quality of the goods. E-commerce products are basically not the same as physical products. Moreover, the products are clearly divided into online and offline products during production. Can you imagine what the quality is like online?

The development of e-commerce will definitely make a greater contribution to the economy. First, it will reduce the circulation of goods and the distance between goods and consumers, promote commodity consumption, increase commodity output, and increase factory production orders. It can also reduce social disputes over fund exchange issues arising from commodity exchanges. (You can check the transaction funds on WeChat),,,! The problem of traditional merchants losing their jobs due to the emergence of e-commerce should be due to the cognitive issue of the concept that no country's capital assets are exclusively owned by its citizens. If you solve this problem, the more work you do, the more reward you will get, and everything will go smoothly, right? The country is prosperous and the people are prosperous. Develop production scientifically and live a happy life with adequate food and clothing! [Pray]

Of course, e-commerce has made a big contribution! ? In the past, the money earned by millions of entity owners is now earned by a few platform owners. In the past, profits were scattered, but now a few major platforms have concentrated profits. Only by concentrating profits can we do big things. In businesses that compete with the public to make quick money, such as community group buying, it is an inherent routine to scatter money first and then reap it. Anyway, it’s up to Huawei, SMIC, SMIC, etc. to break through the bottleneck!

This question is a bit interesting. In fact, whether it contributes much to the economy can be roughly seen by looking at the turnover. According to statistics, e-commerce sales in 2020 will be 11 trillion, and national sales will be 40 trillion. Slightly more than a quarter. According to these data, physical stores will make a large contribution in 2020. But we must see that the future potential of e-commerce is still huge. Especially since the COVID-19 epidemic, in order to meet the needs of prevention and control, people need to focus less, and physical stores will be greatly affected. However, e-commerce can make up for this problem, and e-commerce does not need to focus at all. It should be said that both have played a role in boosting consumption. If the products produced by the factory cannot be sold, the impact on the economy will be great. Both e-commerce and physical stores can complete this task, and both contribute to economic development. Judging from last year’s data, physical stores are large and e-commerce is small. But from a development perspective, e-commerce sales will continue to increase. Firstly, people are increasingly using their time for things other than shopping and do not spend a lot of time visiting shopping malls. Secondly, no large shopping mall has an e-commerce platform with a complete range of categories and comprehensive coverage of product quality. Physical stores can't compare. Another point is that the return and exchange system of e-commerce is simpler and easier than that of physical stores. I remember once buying a mobile phone in a physical store. I used it for an hour and found that it was not ideal. I wanted to replace it with another one. The physical store firmly disagreed and said that it had been used after opening the package. I called the Consumer Association. , the other party also said that there was nothing wrong with the product and they should not exchange it. But I bought two projectors on an e-commerce platform. When I opened them and compared them, I found the differences. These differences cannot be seen by looking at product advertisements. So the e-commerce company’s 7-day no-reasons return system allowed me to get a smooth refund. It truly embodies the values ????with consumer satisfaction as its core. Some people may say that you can also shop around in a physical store? Wrong, some product problems cannot be detected in a short period of time. It takes more time to find out after taking them back, and this time period is impossible in a physical store. In addition, the product coverage of a specific physical store is far inferior to the product types of the e-commerce platform, and there is no way to do a real shopping comparison. Therefore, I think e-commerce still has a lot of room for development. Since they can all solve the sales problem, it is hard to say who should be supported and who should be suppressed, or whether consumers should be allowed to choose based on satisfaction.

E-commerce will only freeze China’s economy and intensify social conflicts, which is not suitable for China’s national conditions at all.

This is really hard to explain.

Efficiency and fairness are often in conflict, automation and high employment are in conflict, and there are also social stability issues. I personally think that e-commerce is good for both buyers and sellers, but nothing is isolated. Some things are viewed to the extreme from this perspective, but From another perspective, it is extremely bad. Alas, the country is so big, the population is so large, and the complexity of society is really difficult to describe.

There is hope for physical stores. The "national" people all dislike it. How many steps can I make a little money from electricity bills, room charges, and water bills?

I am on the "street" these days. Go to "Playing with the city's facade house 65" "closed" but not so cunning "junction" or Xiao Xiangzi, for every 100 items, 65 are closed

This problem is caused by various problems, not profiteers. One person defeated him, e-commerce

Supermarket morning market alternative, ballroom square dance alternative

Barbering on the street... Many, many problems caused! >The biggest enemy is that there are fewer people, 1/3 less ①

It is really difficult to get back to the original state, it is harder than climbing to the sky. The biggest enemy is that there are too few people. I feel that 1/3 of the preview city is missing. People have returned to the countryside and it has become an "empty city"

Fa

Morning

If you ask who has made great contributions to the people and who has made great contributions to the people, I will Who do you support?

E-commerce contributes a lot to the economy, and more importantly, consumers get rid of middlemen, and people benefit from it. Now that e-commerce has gone abroad, there is another benefit to the economy. It is convenient for farmers, selling agricultural products directly across the country, helping farmers get rich.

There is also an advantage that the state can supervise all transaction payments. There is no way to supervise the price of purchases and sales in physical stores, and tax revenue is lost.