Not feasible.
In my experience in finance for many years, if you don't want to go to work with only 500,000 in savings, then such a life is not guaranteed. One of the first and foremost problems is that one cannot afford to get sick. Of course, if in the absence of unexpected expenses, 500,000 can still live a good life.
Take out 50,000 of the emergency money, the rest of the 450,000, buy into the financial management or fund, capital preservation type of financial income will not be very high, but more stable, a day's return of about 50 to 60 dollars. This kind of earnings if you live in the countryside, or three or four lines of small cities, can also live a very nourishing.
But if the heroine, lives in a first or second-tier city, then this little deposit is not enough to support her for the rest of her life, let alone to pursue a quality life.
In fact, people at a certain stage, will inevitably encounter professional burnout, do not want to work, do not want to socialize. I just want to go to a quiet place and stay alone. Last month, I posted a similar message in my circle of friends, "I think I can retire." Friends saw the message and liked it and expressed envy.
Some commented on just how much savings a person has to have the courage to say such a thing. However, they don't realize that even if I don't work I have extra income. In addition to the rent I collect every year, I have dividends to take, and of course the original shares.
We tend to be subjective when we comment on a person. We never see their efforts, yet we point fingers at people. Some people are not even as good as them, yet they point out others in their comments. It's like he who makes 3000 a month never understands what the difference is between someone who makes 30,000 a month and him.
Women, no matter what age they are and whether they have savings or not, they need to have enough backbone and the capital to idle themselves at any time to give themselves a break.