In the classroom is the student to cooperate with the teacher or the teacher to cooperate with the students

Who should "cooperate" in the classroom? Whether it is students with the teacher's teaching, or teachers with students to learn? According to the traditional concept of education, I'm afraid that the students should take the initiative to cooperate with the teacher's majority. The reason is very simple, the teacher is the protagonist of the classroom, is the classroom rhythm of the driver, is the content of the teaching, teaching methods of the decision maker, the students should become along with the teacher's thinking also tend to follow the "servant". Even in today's discussion about the success of a class, we can still hear such as "teachers teach the right way, the students with the right" or "teachers teach hard, the students with the wrong" and other comments. Between the words through the "success of the teacher, the failure of the students" meaning correct or not we do not say, but the students as a "supporting role", for the teacher's "with the" this point is It is obvious. At least in the subconscious of these people, the teacher is the role in the classroom, and the students can only look up to the teacher: pre-study before class according to the teacher's requirements, study in class according to the teacher's organization, and review after class according to the teacher's layout. In a word: in the whole learning process, students have to "cooperate" or even "cater" to the teacher in all aspects. To explore the question of "who is cooperating with whom", it is necessary to first look at the dictionary interpretation of the word "cooperation": "the division of labor among various parties to accomplish a **** the same task." For our classroom teaching, what is this "**** the same task"? Obviously, the most important task of classroom teaching is to provide as many conditions as possible for students to learn, so that students can learn knowledge, skills, and improve their quality and taste. Understand this, we should realize that the teacher, the traditional meaning of the teaching activities in the "protagonist" position should now be given to the students, at least can not let the students when their "supporting role". The "cooperation" between teachers and students is the division of labor between teachers and students to complete the task of making students learn better! So it seems, in the whole learning process, the teacher should be active with the students, rather than let the students passive to "with" the teacher! Of course, the teacher is the classroom "supporting role" is not to weaken the status of teachers in the classroom teaching, reduce the requirements of the work of teachers, because the classroom "supporting role" may not be more than the "protagonist! "When it is easy. There is first of all a concept of conversion of the problem - teachers have to be willing to play a supporting role in the spirit and psychological preparation. Teachers' task is to "assist" students to learn, through the teacher's needle and thread to allow students to enter the world of knowledge on their own. For student learning, teachers can guide, can suggest, but should not be forced, not to mention the replacement, so that students have no opinion. In the classroom, teachers should help students to open their minds, activate their thinking, but should not allow students to catch up with the teacher's thinking, and follow the teacher's footsteps. The most active in the classroom should be the students rather than the teacher, the teacher should find ways to let each student can get the fullest play ...... This requires that our teachers have a wealth of educational experience and profound knowledge, but also have to deal with a variety of special circumstances and complex situations of educational resourcefulness and adaptability. In this way, we are able to face all kinds of complicated situations in the classroom and answer all kinds of questions raised by students. Teachers' knowledge base in addition to the subject's professional knowledge, should also include pedagogical and psychological knowledge, general knowledge of literature and history, a variety of natural sciences, as well as the ever-changing types of new knowledge. With this knowledge, we can make us in the teaching process to grasp the students' psychology, to find students learning in a variety of issues, easy to face the students' questions, the students' knowledge of the key points in the grasp and elaboration to achieve a high level, in-depth. Such a "supporting role" will give the "protagonist" with strong support, so that the "protagonist" on the stage to get the maximum degree of play. With a common analogy, in the whole teaching process, the role of the teacher is like a tour guide, the tourists are touring the activities of the "protagonist", touring the task should be completed by them. But the guide "guide" well, the tourists will have a big gain, will be less detour, more sightseeing. In the tour, the tour guide to do everything on behalf of the tourists will feel tasteless, tour no gain; tour guide to the tourists free to let go, it is possible to make the tourists do not get the point, and even lost the direction of the wrong way. In the teaching process, teachers how to "guide" in order to make the students "swim" with half the effort, the effectiveness of outstanding, which is a great deal of learning to do.