Recently, there has been a lot of discussion and controversy about delayed retirement, and since "gradual delayed retirement" was written into the "14th Five-Year Plan" of 2021-2025, the pros and cons of delayed retirement have been debated again.
Delayed retirement policy can be said to be "a few happy and a few worried", I also understand the side of the 70, 80, 90 for the delayed retirement of the views, in addition to some of the 90 after the beginning of the workplace that the retirement of a distant thing, not too much to hold the opposition! The majority of the post-80s, especially the post-70s, hold opposing views on delayed retirement.
In the crowd against delayed retirement, those engaged in manual labor, front-line workers are particularly opposed to, give the starting point is also very real and grounded: "If I can easily make money in the post, I want to be not a manual laborer, I also support the delayed retirement"!
Yes, the words are not rough, the first-line manual laborers against delayed retirement is in fact very easy to understand, they are engaged in every day assembly line work, carrying goods, digging work has been very tired, decades of hard work is nothing more than in order to will be the son and daughter to raise adults can be in the retirement to enjoy the old age life. To be honest, anyone can persevere in front-line manual work for a few years, but what about 15 years? Suddenly one day when you are close to retirement, you are asked to work for another 5 years, who can bear it?
Also, to be honest, there are people around me who are in favor of delayed retirement, but after counting, I found that these groups are mainly technicians, cadres in the institutions and organizations, and brainiacs in the enterprises.
As an example, I have a 56-year-old technical staff around me hands in favor of delayed retirement, his current job is responsible for steel mill equipment to do routine performance testing, a month of work time is not more than 8 days a day, just three or four hours a day, although the fight in the first line, but every time out of work are suits, equipment problems to find the supplier's employees Demolition of equipment problems to find suppliers of staff maintenance can be, they only need to find the problem according to experience on the line, with the "physical workers" is not at all related to the delay after work to go home to take care of their grandchildren, square dancing, chess, a lot of free time, monthly salary of more than 10,000 yuan. How can such skilled workers not support delayed retirement? I would also like to continue to "shine" in the workplace, not only earn a reputation, but also the family work both, and the main high salary can be taken, there is pension insurance can continue to pay, when the retirement pension higher.
But skilled workers, brain workers, leading cadres in institutions, the vast majority of ordinary front-line workers, this part of the group has been seriously overdrawn, the health situation is not as good as a year, and there are even a lot of people fell into the occupational disease.
So the policy makers who suggested delaying retirement have not taken into account the actual difficulties of this group? I don't want to see an across-the-board delayed retirement policy, even if there are deeper considerations for delaying retirement, such as ensuring an adequate supply of labor in the future, and maintaining a balanced balance of the social security fund, but delaying retirement for each individual will, to a certain extent, harm the individual's relevant interests.
Therefore, the formulation of a delayed retirement policy that meets the needs of the majority of the population is fundamental to the better implementation of delayed retirement, for example, it is not mandatory for everyone to retire at a certain age, and those who are in good health and can continue to work in their jobs and engage in mental labor can choose to delay their retirement as long as they can apply for the basic requirements of the workplace. The first step is to make sure that you have the right to be able to do so.
But can those who have worked all their lives as manual laborers also have the right not to choose to delay their retirement? For example, the retirement age "flexible system", the provisions of the 60 - 65 years old between , as long as the age of any time in this age group to choose to retire is possible, so that those who have problems with the physical condition of the early retirement, the body is still good can be a little late to retire, is not it not two birds with one stone? The first step is to make sure that you have the best possible chance of getting the best out of your life.
Additionally, delaying the retirement of some of the basic security at the same time should be followed , such as health care, injury protection, unemployment protection, etc. If the security can not keep up, then the elderly in the competition with young people in the workplace have no advantage at all. For example, how can older workers protect their jobs from being taken by younger people? What if they are dismissed by their employers on the grounds of "old age" before they reach retirement age? Can you find a new job at your age? Can they be re-employed? Who will protect the interests involved? There is no guarantee that the unilateral delay in retirement is "empty talk".
Of course, now the details of the delayed retirement is still at the level of the seminar, the specific details have not really been implemented, the specific policy of what we do not know, here just as an individual to mention a little bit of their own views.
I believe that many people understand the far-reaching considerations of the state delayed retirement, some of the difficulties we do not solve this generation, a delay to the next generation to solve it is irresponsible , just hope that the relevant departments and decision-makers can give the first-line manual workers more policy tilt, so that they can rest in retirement life.
Delayed retirement in the end because the first line of no workers or social security needs, this is a need to say understand the problem. If it is a lack of staff on the front line, then reduce the labor requirements, will certainly be able to meet. Now the big companies move to require advanced degrees, and even receptionists need a PhD or something. If it is because the social security fund is insufficient, it needs to be said, now every year, the increase in retirement benefits, these are used in the social security fund, so it causes social security difficulties. The reason why retirement payments go up year after year should be because prices are rising too fast. Then the key to solving the problem is not to delay the retirement, but to reduce prices, to ensure that the wages of retirees and the proportion of prices is proportional to the root of the problem.
First of all, those who do not have to pay social security pensions are higher instead of solved, and then say delayed retirement, okay? Those who do not have to pay their own money of course hope that the delayed retirement
Should let the people who support the delayed retirement, 30 years old, all arranged to work in the production line, 40 was laid off, and then find their own jobs, buy their own pension insurance, must be dry to 65 years old, and then depending on the situation, as long as you can still move, push also have to be pushed to go to work to play the rest of the heat.
Who exactly are the people who support delayed retirement? I think it is sitting in the office of those people, the specific industry we will not say, easy to offend, simply put, you let the old driver over 60 years old to drive a bus, you dare to sit? If you let a doctor over 60 years old give you an injection, do you agree? When my mother was sick, she needed an infusion at home, and my brother found an old doctor who runs a clinic to save trouble, and it took him close to 15 minutes just to find a blood vessel. Fortunately, the old man's sensitivity to pain is not very strong, but we were watching from the side of the heart, and after the needle was stuck, he was sweating, and it was in the middle of the winter; and in the construction industry, don't say that you should participate in manual labor, or you should be allowed to do manual labor at a 35-degree temperature, or a minus ten-degree temperature, or a minus ten-degree temperature. The construction industry, not to mention let you participate in manual labor, is to let you in 35 degrees of high temperature, or minus ten degrees of low temperature standing there, nothing to do, eight hours a day, bear it? Sweeping the road looks easy work, the climate you can not stand, I have a classmate 60 years of age is not to sweep the road for others, summer heat stroke did not rescue over, it is said that the competent authorities to pay more than 300,000, so that a broad-brush delayed retirement may not work, based solely on personal desire can not be, we must check the body, to re-sign the contract, my unit was managed by the life of the seven or eight, in addition to the three young women, the other five or six men are not available, the other five or six men have not been able to work. The other five or six men did not live to 65 years old.
Every day shouting to delay the retirement of the people are working all day drinking tea, look at the newspaper people, and struggling in the production of the first line of people, has been the heart of the child is not enough, that is, on the 60, delayed retirement, can only be to their own, the unit to increase the burden, but to the State Pension Organization to make a contribution.
Unfortunately, the formulation of the policy and support the policy of the people can work in their positions until the age of 70 or 80 years
Support for the extension of the retirement of the people are unarmed, move the mouth of the people, called them on the front line, to ensure that they live not 65 years old, unfortunately, the formulation of the policy of the extension of the retirement of the people is not the ordinary toiling masses, is the above mentioned class, they are just taken for granted, in accordance with their own maximum interests, to protect their own advantage to make a decision, and to ensure that they have the best interests, and to ensure that their own advantage to make a decision. They just take it for granted that they will make decisions according to their own best interests and safeguard their own advantages, and they will not have mercy on the general public who have bled and sweated and survived with illnesses. Delaying retirement should be based on the interests of the people and their survival as the basic principle, and it should not be changed by the will of a few people. Taking into account the interests of the public, and steadily promote the delayed retirement, is the people are willing to accept.
Delayed retirement should be treated differently, career, business, organizations, factories, front-line workers, across-the-board delayed retirement is unreasonable and unreasonable, although the average life expectancy has been extended, but the human body health condition is not as good as it was before, experts, researchers do not visit the personal experience of the workers' current situation, Chairman Mao: there are investigations and research to have the right to speak, and be cautious in all matters.
China's national conditions and developed countries are not the same, China and Germany than the average annual working hours, there are no night shifts, Saturdays and Sundays there are no vacations, every day to eat what meals, ask how many times a worker has eaten beef per meal (canteen to eat up the pork is really less), the current level of development is only suitable for the age of 60 years old to retire, China is only a developing country, China is not a developed country, ask those who are what support the extended retirement, heart does not count? Extended Retirement, the heart does not count? Hard work for half a lifetime even if, extended retirement to let people work until death, and then the pension surplus, and finally I do not know into whose pockets? At present, the pension gap is large, what group of people receive more, according to the policy adjustment, at present, really not suitable for delayed retirement, only part of the civil servants and experts, professors, stars, doctors, teachers, police, leaders, and so on the crowd, may be agreeable to the delayed retirement. It can be said that the absolute minority, news reports: the Premier said 600 million people monthly income of only 1,000, for the 600 million people think about it? But the vast majority of China's free employment wage earners and farmers, factory workers, security guards, waiters, coal workers, according to medical data show that the labor force to the age of 50 years old to 60 years old within the disease syndrome , a little attention will lose their lives, after all, year-round fatigue coupled with the lack of attention to keep fit caused by physical defects resulting in a variety of diseases, and rural areas. The labor force in the 50 to 60 years old between the cancer rate is the highest, so many people can not afford to see the disease finally lost their lives, corporate workers work 8 to 11 hours a year, or even longer overtime to overnight, no rest, inverted day and night shifts, the bottom of China's rural migrant workers, it has been very hard, I do not know who put forward the proposal of the delayed retirement, but I want to speak from the heart, please do not put their own happiness built on the pain of others! Now most of the elderly to help bring children and grandchildren, delayed retirement will also affect the birth rate, middle-aged people to the age of 35 years old and above to find a job, truly difficult ah, and so over the age of 60 years old who dare to hire you, I hope to delay the retirement of the people who understand the meaning of this sentence, please remember that China is a large country with a large population, not like Europe and the United States, like the developed countries, and now more than ever, should be to increase the age of 60 years old retiree pensions, rather than engage in delayed retirement.