It is difficult to implement quality education without changing the evaluation mechanism.
Quality education has been implemented for many years, but there has been no fundamental change in the evaluation mechanism, which is still based on a test for life. The assessment and evaluation of teachers at all levels of educational administration is still based on performance standards. The first time I saw this is when I was a kid, and I was a kid, and I was a kid, and I was a kid, and I was a kid, and I was a kid.
Elementary school to junior high school to carry out the examination, junior high school to carry out the examination, and ultimately are to take the results as the basis for judgment, never to the quality of education as a comprehensive evaluation of ordinary standards, then it is difficult to change the current situation.
The evaluation mechanism of the baton did not change, and go to the implementation of quality education, naturally, it is difficult to carry out. The emergence of the status quo is that teachers in order to improve their grades, squeezing the time of other subjects, as well as other comprehensive practice of students all the time for cultural classes, to students to assign a large number of repetitive mechanical homework, this is the current status quo
I think it is the standard to be clear, is to say that the quality of education in primary and secondary education to achieve what standards, what to improve the content of the content of the uniform inter-regional disparities, to be. Can not just shout slogans, Yuk purpose to do. In this way, it is necessary to strictly control the mouth of education in all parts of the world, in order to achieve the real purpose of quality education.
The real meaning of quality education is different from the one advocated by schools or education departments!
China as a state of etiquette, in the traditional point of view, a person's quality of cultivation aside from knowledge, more is reflected in the way he treats people and daily behavior and behavior in the performance of etiquette and so on.
This aspect of the ancient society's public opinion and culture, so that people take this for granted, naturally have a good social culture. Now many people do not take this seriously, think it is red tape, and can not bring the economy to the city, pay attention to etiquette and politeness has little meaning. Gradually diluted, good social culture has been rare.
Parents do not pay attention to the quality of education, parents of their own quality problems, which is the biggest impact. Of course, the quality of education in schools is not systematic also has a certain impact!
The standard of the society to select, employ and measure the value of people is monotonous, biased and flat, highlighting the "elitism" of the secondary school exams and college entrance exams.
"Quality education is a fire, test education is solid" is now a true reflection of the primary and secondary schools. Why is it difficult to implement quality education? To clarify this issue, we must first clarify the relationship between quality education and test education. First, the test education "life" does not mean that quality education is "death". Secondly, if the nature of social competition does not change, test-based education will exist for a long time. When social competition eases, quality education will be realized naturally.
First, the quality of education and test education is not incompatible, the two are mutually overlapping
As the quality of education is proposed for test education, so now people for test education has become a street rat, everyone shouting. The quality of education has become a halo of honor, and all schools are boasting that they are engaged in quality education. As if the two can never coexist. So that the implementation of the stage just appeared a lot of local management under the red-headed document does not allow the examination of the same ridiculous.
In fact, the two test education and quality education is not incompatible, just different values, test education refers to the form of education purely for the purpose of carrying out education. Quality education is a form of education that focuses on the overall quality of students, but the test is actually a quality. Accepting the challenge of mastering knowledge is inevitably the due content of quality education, so that quality education is not examined, not memorized is completely wrong, is to another extreme.
So, we can't think that quality education is not being promoted because test-based education still exists. As long as the components of the test are gradually reduced, in fact, is the quality of education in the continuous development.
Second, the quality of education can not be replaced overnight test education, the two will be long-term **** exist
Hegel said: existence is reasonable. Exam education in the national vigorously promote the quality of education in the scenario, can still do solid, there must be its rationality. Its reasonableness is the lack of existing quality social resources in our country, and education is an important way to realize the distribution of quality social resources. Therefore, education to the test is seen as an educational problem, but in fact it is only a reaction to the intensification of social competition in the field of education. As long as the intensity of social competition in China is not substantially alleviated, it is impossible for test-based education to disappear from the field of education. On the other hand, as long as the social competition is substantially reduced, then quality education will naturally become the main form of education, and test education will naturally die out.
In summary, the difficulty of implementing quality education is not an educational problem but a social problem. The reason for this is that the social competition is fierce, and people need to fight for more social resources through education, and the test-based education is the most important form of clear distribution, so it is difficult to eliminate the test-based education, and it is difficult to promote quality education.
The difficulty of eliminating test-based education and implementing quality education is due to a variety of reasons, so don't always let the schools and teachers take the blame!
1. With the traditional education and teaching concepts, strategies, means difficult to change;
The traditional exam-oriented education to the teacher as the center, to the textbook as the center, to the classroom as the center, the students as a container, the teacher is full of every class; the students as a machine, a rote learning, mechanical training. . These traditional concepts of the impact is not very easy to eliminate.
2. Related to the higher authorities' evaluation standards for schools and teachers;
The higher authorities are still focusing on the promotion rate in their assessment of schools and teachers. From now on, schools with high promotion rates are often excellent schools, principals with high promotion rates are excellent principals, and teachers with high promotion rates are excellent teachers.
3. Related to the country's current talent selection mechanism;
From the current secondary school exams, college entrance exams, and even the usual recruitment exams, it is still based on the cultural achievements, and can't comprehensively examine a person's comprehensive quality. Why should we promote quality education when we can't test the overall quality?
4. With the society as a whole thick utilitarian thinking;
Today's society is too impatient, too utilitarian, often eager to achieve, pulling the seedling to help grow. By this psychological influence, people are always mindful, racking their brains to improve students' cultural achievements through quick fixes, rather than letting the children calmly and comprehensively develop and improve.
5. Related to the uneven economic development of the regions;
The more economically backward the region, the deeper the concept of teaching to the test. People are eager to get rich, eager to get promoted, then their hopes are pinned on the children, pinned on the children's academic performance, which have the heart to carry out what quality education! Moreover, the implementation of quality education requires a certain economic and material basis. The first thing you need to do is to get your hands on a new pair of shoes or boots.
......
Fortunately, with the development of the economy and society, with the transformation of the concept of education in all sectors of society, with the guidance and supervision of the national policy, now, all aspects of the efforts to change, and transformation. Test-based education will become a street rat, quality education will become the ultimate choice of this society!
Well, I personally understand that quality education should be a philosophy, not a fixed pattern style. Therefore, in a sense, the discussion of the implementation of this proposition itself is a bit of a false proposition suspicion. In my opinion, the implementation of the concept of quality education is more critical in the education system reform itself, that is, to remove more unnecessary administrative, rather than a variety of so-called promotion of innovation, research, competitions, competitions, quantitative, assessment, and so on, there is a counter-quality education of the pressurized burden on the administrative behavior, because this kind of passive alternative filler, not only did not give the students to reduce the burden, but instead, because of the teacher's exhaustion to cope with yielding, leading to the school form of the form of the burden on the student. To cope with the yield, leading to the proliferation of school formalism, not doing their jobs, affecting the normal teaching, lowering the quality of teaching, and even become a breeding ground for corruption and other negative effects. As for the implementation and execution of the concept of quality education, I personally believe that the first thing should be to start from the training of the teaching force, especially the professionalization of the teaching profession, I am also debatable on the practice of teacher qualification, of course, the concept of quality education has been y rooted in the country except that, otherwise, without the systematic training, on the concept of education and teaching, the lack of training and exercise in the psychology of the students to fill in the candidates, despite the academic qualification is high, the professional perhaps Common, but its teaching ability quality is not necessarily lower than its academic qualifications, but after professional training of the ordinary demonstration of teachers high, at least a period of time to exercise to meet the requirements, so this so-called reform, is tantamount to the implementation of quality education to add a stumbling block, a lot of schools blindly pursuing a high level of education facade, disregard for the laws of education to undergraduate early childhood education, graduate students to teach elementary school, masters doctorate to join the middle school High school is proud of. In fact, many local education administrations are not unaware of its power, and many school leaders have complained that they would rather have the past secondary school teacher trainees, but also do not want to recruit the current one non-teacher trainees, and would rather have the second teacher trainees, but also do not want non-teacher trainees graduate students Master's degree PhD, perhaps also based on this reason, right, but for the pressure of the higher administrative indicators of the assessment, the school also had to submit, comply, and had to give the teacher pressure and burden, and so on and so forth. But for the pressure of the higher administrative index examination, the school also had to yield, comply with, and had to give the teacher to pressurize the burden, so the cycle is repeated, and how to talk about the implementation of quality education. These are some of my less mature feelings and opinions, thanks for reading.
To answer this question, we must first understand what is quality education?
Quality education refers to the face of all students, comprehensively improve students in moral education, aesthetic education, sports, labor education in several aspects of quality education. Intellectual education plays a small role.
I think the reasons why it is difficult to implement quality education are as follows:
1.
It has been more than twenty years since the implementation of quality education began in the mid-1990s. Over the past twenty years, what have we felt? Feeling is still mainly to test education, to the test as the center, only the theory of scores, to scores on heroes. Although the policy has been mentioned again and again, it always stays on the surface, not really practiced for a long time, not really insisted on.
Although the quality of education has made some improvements, but the arm can not twist the thigh, test-based education highlights very much. Quality education has been shouted for so many years, and eventually returned to the examination education.
2. The examination of education is y rooted.
Although the elementary school is not as intense as the college entrance exams, most parents are willing to their children can not lose at the starting line, early to send to the educational institutions, early to learn this and that, especially subject training.
Three years of struggle in junior high school is to be able to take a good high school. Which has the time and energy to get a good quality education? So quality education is just like a cloud, floating on the past. High school struggle for three years, is in order to get into a good university. Which has the time and energy to do a good quality education? So quality education is just a slapdash.
3. Quality education is not yet fully equipped.
Some big cities, the implementation of quality education is very good, because these big cities have good conditions for quality education, can provide students with good places, good teachers. But in some places where the conditions are not good, it is difficult to implement it or it is not implemented well.
In short, the main reason why quality education is difficult to implement is that exam-oriented education is dominant.
These years, quality education is the slogan more and more loudly, but the actual fundamental in the grassroots not much action, the root cause, as a grass-roots teachers, have the following views.
First, the college entrance exam baton has not changed.
The society is generally concerned about the new college entrance examination reform has basically landed, as a teacher to see, this reform is a failure. By the original shouted the most lively arts and science not divided into subjects, to the current 3 +1 + 2, etc., I feel that basically has been reformed for the reform, itself does not have a substantial change, and ultimately still look at the score. The college entrance examination is the ultimate goal of primary and secondary education, so the college entrance examination depends on the score, then the secondary examination will have to look at the score, the elementary school will have to look at the graduation examination, layer after layer of pressure down, the score is still the most important, so quality education has become a slogan.
Secondly, test-based education is still the most direct method of assessment.
Every year, the education authorities have to assess the teachers, and the schools also have to assess, so what does the assessment look at? The most direct and least controversial is the score, so the score is related to the immediate interests of teachers, so teachers are forced to engage in the score competition, so how to improve the score is the focus of the study of teachers, as for the quality of education that depends on the individual situation.
Third, the parents' demand is that the future test scores should be high.
Quality education is a good thing to say, but you can't see it, you can't touch it. And the college entrance examination in the good score, get into a good university to the most direct, so parents only care about the score, as for the teachers are not quality education does not care.
Fourth, the education and administrative authorities did not really do anything, a variety of quality education documents, substantive content is very little, supervision and supervision is basically a formality.
I'm glad to answer your question. Why is it difficult to promote quality education in primary and secondary schools, the fundamental reason is that people have not recognized the connotation of quality education in place. There are mainly the following two misunderstandings.
One of them is that quality education means no exams. Since the midterm and college entrance exams still exist, there is no room for quality education. Because all the work of the school around the test baton, otherwise, there is no way to give students parents and society to a satisfactory account, parents do not agree, society is not satisfied, which means that "the people are not satisfied", the school's reputation will be seriously damaged, the higher authorities will give the principal of "toxic The first thing I want to do is to make sure that you have a good understanding of what you are doing and how you are doing it.
In this way, there is a lack of motivation to implement quality education at the school level. In fact, the examination is only a form, a means of checking the quality of education and teaching and selecting talents, the key lies in how to test, test what. Without examinations or an assessment mechanism, the quality of students will not be correctly assessed and there will be no feedback on the teaching situation, so how can teaching be improved and enhanced? Therefore, the test a stick to death, from one extreme to another extreme performance, not a scientific attitude.
The second is that the quality of education is special education, is jumping, pulling singing, writing and painting. Let each child has a special skill, such as sports, dance, voice, painting, program hosting, etc., and these for the school, and is a great lack of talent, only a little talent must be used in the "blade", so that they take the college entrance examination team, to participate in a variety of competitions. Moreover, in order to give students enough time to develop their specialties, it is necessary to reduce the burden of students' schoolwork.
In fact, the specialties are only part of the human qualities, so that students can enjoy themselves physically and mentally, and learn easily, should be mainly a change in the teaching method, rather than just reduce the learning of essential knowledge, relax the mastery of essential skills.
It can be seen that we must accurately grasp the connotation of quality education, so as not to lose their way in the process of educational reform. To summarize, quality education mainly includes the following five characteristics: to improve the quality of the people as the fundamental purpose (which is the purpose of education, at present, pay special attention to the cultivation of core literacy); for all students (which is the object of education, but also to ensure that the basic principle of fairness in education); to promote the all-round development of the students (in particular, the moral education can not be absent, at present, because of the labor education is relatively too weak, so a lot of emphasis on labor education); to promote the personality of the students, and to promote the development of the students' personality. At present, because labor education is relatively too weak, so very much emphasis on labor education); to promote the development of students' personality (society needs all kinds of talents); to cultivate the spirit of innovation and practical ability as the focus (society needs high-tech talents and practical talents). Grasping these connotations, in the practice of education, and steadily promote quality education, there is a direction to move forward and motivation.
Well, today's question is answered here. If there are other doubts, welcome to leave a message to exchange.