When switching cameras, do you think it's better to get a D850 full frame or a D500 apsc? Why?

The question of changing the camera I think is a bit interesting ah, the subject itself with the D7000, half-frame SLR, if you say to change the camera also continue to half-frame, then, change and what is the point?

Needless to say, the D850 is too expensive

The D850 is currently Nikon's machine inside the high-end SLR, cost-effective as well as in all aspects of the good, the price is not cheap! If the subject means a D850 can buy two D500, then you continue to use the half-frame what is the point? D7000 is an entry-level SLR, replace the D500 may be slightly better, but in the final analysis is still not too much change, still using the D7000 set of lenses, floating aperture, carrying a fixed-focus need factor!

D500 is also a speed machine, like the Canon 7D series in general, there are some special shooting will be used, unless the subject for continuous shooting speed needs, of course, now the continuous shooting speed of the micro-single is more powerful, really need to continuous shooting speed, you can also consider the micro-single!

D850 is too expensive, you can D700, D750 and other SLR options ah, no one forced you to come up with a more advanced SLR!

Hello, Nikon D500, Canon 7D2, Nikon D5, Canon 1DX, Sony A6500, Sony A9, Fujifilm XH1, Panasonic G9, these models are niche models, not the masses. Only those who really need them, who really know them, need them.

After reading a thousand sails, it may still be best to play Fujifilm micro-single, of course, if you are working, then it is still necessary to be careful to choose the Fujifilm

For the majority of people do not need the Nikon D500, Canon 7D2, Nikon D5, Canon 1DX, Sony A6500, Sony A9, Fujifilm XH1, Panasonic G9.

If you just want to save money, then you can use it for your own purposes. p> If you're just looking to save money, I'd say the Canon 200D, Nikon D7200, Fuji XT20, Sony A7M2, all of these are better for you.

Well, your original question was, when switching cameras, do you think it's better to get a D850 full frame or a D500 apsc? Why? I use a Nikon d7000, and now I'm switching machines, should I go with a d850 full frame, or a d500 apsc (after all, you can buy 2 d500's for 1 850)? I have two of my lenses now, regardless of value, and it's still expensive to change to a full buy later.

I'll break it down for you specifically:

1, the problem with the Nikon D850, is that the body is bulky, and the lenses are bulky. Well, you buy a Nikon D850, you have to buy lenses according to Nikon's official recommendations, and Nikon's official recommendations are bulky and expensive.

If you are not going to purchase lenses according to Nikon's official recommendations, then, please don't buy Nikon D850.

2, Nikon D500, is a very niche model, and the fact that you are asking this means that it is definitely not for you.

3, you are using the Nikon D7000, the advantage of the Nikon D7000 is that the colors are bright and sharp straight out, but the disadvantage, is that the tolerance is very poor.

If you like the colors bright and sharp, and do not feel that the tolerance is poor, then I think the Nikon D7000 you can continue to use.

Because Nikon D7000 and later models, the color is very gray, very obscure colors, I'm afraid you will be difficult to adapt to it.

4, if you like the bright colors of the Nikon D7000, but want to increase the tolerance.

5, if you like the feel and weight of the Nikon D7000, but do not like too bulky.

6, then, in fact, you can consider changing the door to Fujifilm XE3 or Fujifilm XT20, colorful and comfortable. And Fuji's tolerance is not bad, of course, Fuji's tolerance is still impossible to compare with the Nikon D800 series D7200.

7, as an old player, many people end up choosing Fuji micro-single. It actually makes sense.

8, and only old players, who really know what they're doing, are fit to play with the Fuji Microscan.

Well, to summarize, I think you might be better off switching to a Fuji MicroSD.

Fuji MicroSD, for the veteran gamer who has seen it all.

First of all, the D850 and D500 are completely different machines, the D850 is a professional version of the high megapixel machine, suitable for commercial large format output. the D500 is basically the aps-c version of the D5, a speed machine, suitable for shooting sports subjects, and definitely not as good as the D850 in terms of image quality.

With a maximum pixel count of 20MP, the Nikon D500 has a very wide open AF area compared to drop resolution DSLRs. This makes it ideal for shooting sports and wildlife subjects.The D500's 1.5x lens conversion factor is also very useful.

The Nikon D850 is designed for all-weather use, and the body is ergonomically designed to make the D850 more comfortable to use than its predecessor, the D800 series of DSLRs. And with higher pixels and a very good dynamic range in RAW format, it's perfect for landscape photography and small studios.The D850 can also shoot 4K video, making it more useful than the D500 for video shooting.

Note that if you're pairing the D500 with DX-format lenses, you'll need to plunk down more cash for full-frame lenses on the D850 in order to maximize pixelation and cropping in full-frame.

Pros of D850: higher pixels, greater dynamic range, 4K video, no cropping

Pros of D500: better focus, more burst speed, cheaper apc-c format lenses

First of all, I'm upgrading this time from a Nikon d300s directly to a Nikon d5 because I like to shoot eco, and the lenses are the same as before. I purchased the 70200 Bamboo Shooter, which is just right for the Nikon d5, because the Nikon d5 can have a continuous shooting speed of 12 frames per second, allowing me to better capture some great action.

In fact, the subject mentioned d850 and d500, I feel or choose d500 will be better, although it is still a half-frame DSLR, but from the Nikon d7000 directly upgraded to the d850 full-frame silver is burdened with a heavy burden, and then again, I do not know the subject of the two lenses are half-frame lenses or full-frame lenses? If the lenses have DX on them, they won't work on a full frame DSLR.

The Nikon d500 and Nikon d850 are both relatively professional-level DSLRs, and buyers need to buy them because they understand that the rest of the general photographic players will almost never consider these two DSLRs. If the subject shoot still life, landscape, portrait more, I recommend the Nikon D850, after all, more than 40 million pixels so that you have no reason to refuse it, of course, the consequences are more money, if it is like shooting ecological, the pursuit of the shutter speed, then the Nikon D500, at least to ensure that the lens is now universal, 20 megapixels is enough for you to use.

Now you do not consider the price first, first consider why you upgrade? Is it dissatisfaction with the color? The Nikon D7000 does shoot with grayish colors and is not forgiving enough. If it is to meet the shooting a moment of scenery, please give up the upgrade, if it is like, then I still recommend the D500.

Thank you for the teacher invited to answer the question, if you say that the two Nikon cameras, it depends on what you want to shoot, the D850 full-frame camera with high pixels, good image quality, the shutter speed of the continuous shooting is slow, suitable for shooting landscapes, portraits, commercial photography, etc., D500 half-frame camera, features D500 half-frame camera, features fast shutter speed continuous shooting, image quality is also good, suitable for shooting animals, sports sports, etc., the two cameras have different characteristics, need to be based on personal conditions required by the bar!

When changing cameras, do you think it's better to buy a D850 full frame or a D500 apsc? Why?

To be honest, both D850 and D500 are the kings of DSLR, one is a good equipment in full frame, the other is the strongest in half frame.

In fact, no matter which one you change, it is reasonable, as long as you use it well, they will both shoot excellent work.

I have the following two suggestions:

1, if you do not have money problems, then you change the D850, after all, it is a full-frame standing in the peak of the performance in all aspects are quite good, and with a few high-resolution good lenses, is quite perfect.

2. If you consider the lenses left over from your previous half-frame camera, plus the money problem, then you change the D500, so that the previous half-frame lenses can be used on this camera as well, which saves you a lot of money.

Overall, the camera is still in its own use, and used well, your D7000 is also able to shoot very well.

But in terms of camera performance, the D850 and D500 are really good two machines to have.

The above is my opinion, welcome to exchange comments.

Sword Dance Imaging, western photography enthusiasts, welcome to pay attention

If the previous is a half-format machine, it is not recommended to change the full-frame, unless there is a commercial purpose. D500 is already a half-format machine king, very good, no problem to hit the birds. The D500 is already the king of half-frame cameras, and works very well for bird hunting. The cost is a bit bigger, and no different than changing doors. Half-frame lenses are not good enough to get rid of.

Don't hesitate to take the D850

You'd be wise to upgrade if you want to switch.

Playing with DSLRs from C-format and then C-format is meaningless. Only by upgrading will you be able to experience the thrill of a DX (full-frame) DSLR. FX DSLRs are far superior to DX DSLRs in terms of focus, continuous shooting, composition, exposure, and other performance metrics.

As I understand it, the D7000 is already Nikon's entry-level fighter, and all aspects of performance are pretty good in the DX series. Playing photography has a misunderstanding, that is, manufacturers from the commercial interests of creating entry-level products, professional-grade products, in fact, are in order to make money to deceive people

trick. What beginners with full-frame DSLR performance complex, not good grasp, etc., to buy entry-level skilled later upgrade full-frame DSLR. In fact, this is not the case, playing SLR is to choose your favorite SLR machine according to your own strength and your own positioning

Type one step to the position, so as to save both money and time. I'm not sure if you're going to be able to find the right one for you, but I'm sure you'll be able to find the right one for you, and I'm sure you'll be able to find the right one for you, and I'm sure you'll be able to find the right one for you, and I'm sure you'll be able to find the right one for you, and I'm sure you'll be able to find the right one for you. I did not expect less than 3 months on the change of mind, upgrade D810 model, you can say that the first 14,000 yuan hit the water, sold worthless, stay also useless, not lack of money to stay as a spare machine use, now still in the dry box put.

So the advice, like photography on the right product model in one step, do not toss their money. Since you use the D7000, you should be considered a photography enthusiast. So don't hesitate to take the D850, it's a wise choice for you.

So many years of experience tells me that within your financial resources, buy the most expensive machines and lenses in the brand. Because at the end of the day you'll replace the cheap ones and buy the expensive ones. Because the quality is there, no one will not care. If you buy the cheap one and sell it second hand, you lose another fortune. So why not get it all at once?

The most critical part of the digital camera body is his heart ccd, now called coms, the camera's expensive and cheap, the key is here. Just like a canvas, in the big one, what can be recorded, certainly much more than a small canvas. For the sake of preserving more details of the creation, the larger "canvas" is definitely the one to choose.

I remember my d70s is only 6 megapixels now, but it's much clearer than some of the smaller megapixel cards.

Some people think the d850 is too expensive, and that's because he's new, so I don't recommend you buy this machine. You can buy one of his previous models d810 or d800 are fine. The water is removed and the price is right. You just have to remember one thing, you're not buying a machine, you're buying his coms. all other qualities are just clouds.

Finally, one more reminder, because these front models are easy to sell second-hand as a first-hand sold products. This will require you to keep your eyes peeled. Try to buy on a good platform and find an agent with good reviews. I wish you can buy your favorite machine and take perfect photos.

Nikon D850