What is the relationship between China citizens and the government?

I believe everyone has seen such TV pictures: in the United States, major European countries, South Korea, Japan and other developed countries, citizens (especially young people) cover their mouths with white handkerchiefs, confront the police with batons, shields and helmets, throw stones, throw petrol bottles and burn cars. We thought: Why do these developed countries allow such things to exist? This is unthinkable in China. In fact, their government is really smart, because they know that the government is definitely not perfect, which can greatly stimulate the government to improve some problems, improve the enthusiasm of the government and warn civil servants not to be slow; Compared with the benefits brought by the government's progress, a few cars, a few pieces of glass and a few trash cans are worth a few dollars! At the same time, it can release national sentiment. I don't know if you think this example has inspired us. We always keep silent about the government's behavior, turn a blind eye to it, and don't understand it, thus forming the bad habits of the government, such as self-righteousness, arrogance, lack of progress, favoritism and malpractice, and even developing to the extent that individual people cheat the world and steal the reputation and are insensitive. Let's not talk hypocritically about which is better, socialism or capitalism. Which is better, one-party governance or multi-party governance? Let's look at a nation or a country. This has nothing to do with any society or political party. We only look at the people's lives. We can't lie with our eyes open and say that our life (I mean the masses) is better than that of the United States and Japan. Freedom? Therefore, as citizens, we should also review ourselves. Have we fulfilled our obligations to the nation and the country? On the issue of nation-state, have we hung up these important small abacus of self-cleverness and self-protection? We will not obey an already "arrogant" government, but we have an obligation to stimulate it and make it better, healthier and more useful. . . . . . Otherwise, it will die of old age in self-righteousness and inaction, which is not good for it.