According to CCTV 3 15, the problem towel produced by Hebei Levin is made of old socks and old underwear, so it is impossible to guarantee the inspection.
On the evening of July 16, 2020, the CCTV 3 15 party exposed the dark side of the towel production line in Gaoyang County, Hebei Province, the largest towel production base in China. It is shocking that some towel manufacturers openly use it? Raw materials for producing towels from old socks and underwear? Produce towels.
Levin, Baoding, Hebei Province is the largest towel production base in China, with an annual output of 5 billion towels, accounting for about one third of the country.
Hebei Levin towel production line generally has two types. One kind of towel can guarantee the inspection, and the other kind of towel will be processed with cheap yarn, which can't meet the national standard at all.
Later, it was found that inferior towel yarn manufacturers used all kinds of scraps, rags, thread ends and even underwear and socks as raw materials. Without any disinfection procedure, old clothes were put into the machine, cut into pieces and piled on the ground in disorder. After machine grinding and several flowering procedures, the old clothes became cotton again. Because the clothes themselves have various colors, the finished cotton does not look particularly white, and it is full of dust and impurities. The production and processing process is shocking. Even so, these "dirty" merchants still openly transport inferior products to towel factories all over the country, and these towel factories even openly use these "dirty" raw materials to make towels and put them on the market aboveboard!
Although many towel production sites in Gaoyang County are marked with labels that meet the national towel production standards, the actual inspection is unqualified, and there are no warning signs on the product packaging.
So who are these inferior towels sold to?
Weibo, the official company of Liang Yong Towels, issued an apology statement.
At noon on July 17, Weibo, one of the towel factories exposed by CCTV, issued an apology statement saying that he was sorry? 3. 15? Liang Yong towel was reported by the party? Sale? We attached great importance to the quality of brand goods, and set up a special group to investigate this matter at the first time, and actively cooperated with the investigation work of relevant government units. What did the company say was mentioned in the report? Sale? Products, the company's early low-end customized products, were used to meet the needs of some people, and stopped production on 20 19 10.
? Customize low-end products to meet the needs of some people?
False is false, three noes are three noes, but they are dubbed? Low-end customized products? And then what? To meet the needs of some people? I can't help but wonder, can low-end customized products have no bottom line? Can you use such disgusting raw materials to make finished towels?
So the so-called? Meet the needs of some people? Are you online? Some people? Who is it again? Manufacturers don't consider this at all? Some people? Is it a health problem?
Subsequently, Gaoyang County issued a notice, attaching great importance to the exposure of CCTV 3 15 party, and quickly and comprehensively rectified it.
However, what is done is done, and inferior towels have existed in the market for a long time! So is there any omission in the daily supervision of relevant local departments? Does it exist? Tolerance? ? Why can CCTV reporters find problems, while local regulatory authorities can? Completely blind? And then what?
It can be seen that the investigation afterwards is far less than the supervision beforehand. As ordinary people, we really don't want to see an after-the-fact investigation again. Whether it is daily necessities or other commodities, especially food safety issues, we can monitor them in place, spot check them in time and trace their sources.
Especially for the more prominent products involving the safety of ordinary people, if the regulatory authorities do nothing, act slowly and turn a blind eye, should they be punished more severely?