Besides, is it "sexual health"? What's the use of staring at me? I need to see what my sexual partner is like. In extreme cases, if my wife is absolutely "frigid", then my impotence is health. Conversely, if my husband abstains from sex, then I am sick if I have sexual requirements. After all, sex can only exist in some kind of "relationship" unless it is masturbation. If you talk about "sexual health" independently and define it as "having" or "yourself", it is just a word game or something else.
Also, sex is only a part of life, not the whole thing. For the more valuable aspects of life, each of us often has to pay some price and choose what to sacrifice. Sex can't escape this "bad luck". Extremely speaking, in order to pursue the "sexual health" imposed on us by others, can we damage or even lose what we cherish most? Therefore, if we don't put sexual health in the overall situation of our lives, it can only be nonsense.
So, why do these so-called international sexologists go against common sense? To put it bluntly, it is because they don't understand how sexology developed to this day, and they know nothing but biology. In essence, that's because they actually want to impose their values on this financially rich world.
Fortunately, we China people are used to suffering hardships, so we can live more clearly. Because our findings can prove all the analysis made by the author before.
We investigated the frequency of all people's desire for sex and masturbation, as well as the intensity of men's "sexual interest", erection in the morning, "wanting to give up" and "giving up soon", premature orgasm, lack of orgasm, lack of happiness and worry about self-expression. For women, we added two items, sexual pain and vaginal dryness, and then deleted six items that were not suitable for women. Then we will grade everyone according to the scale of 100 (the higher the score, the fewer the problems); So we can analyze it.
Sexual health varies from person to person.
In terms of age, the older men are, the lower their scores are. Men aged 20-24 scored 57.9, and men aged 55-59 scored 4 1.7, with a difference of 17. But it is different among women: women aged 40-44 get the highest score. Regardless of age, the score will go down, and the gap can be as high as 17.
This situation reminds us of at least three things:
First, from the perspective of publicity and education, men's "sexual health" must be divided according to their age. Never use the standards of young people to trap the words of the elderly, and never regard the "decline" of the elderly as unhealthy. Otherwise, it is tantamount to encouraging old men to show off their talents. What are the benefits?
Secondly, academically speaking, the older men are, the less healthy they are. If we have to artificially set a frame of "sexual health" according to the appearance of young people, we will find a "nonsense truth". -If people get healthier with age, will they still die?
Third, in fact, we still can't classify "sexual health" according to age, because women and men are completely different. If the middle-aged women's "yin sheng" phenomenon is taken as the standard, it shows that the younger the women, the less healthy they are. Conversely, if the performance of young people is regarded as "sexual health", then middle-aged women can only be "deviant" or even "abnormal".