1. The evaluation content is comprehensive, including the functions and qualities in biology, psychology, behavior, social adaptability and overall feeling.
2. Indicators reflecting the quality of life are often subjective indicators, and often use functional or behavioral terms to explain the individual's state, rather than the results of clinical diagnosis and laboratory examination.
3. In terms of evaluators, self-evaluation is often used, that is, individuals evaluate their own quality of life or others (doctors). Collection and arrangement of medical education network
4. The evaluation results are time-varying, and are often used as indicators of health care and health promotion, which are more sensitive than some objective health indicators.
5. Various scales are commonly used for measurement, such as ① General Quality of Life Questionnaire, which is a general quality of life questionnaire and can be used for the treatment of different types and severity of diseases, regardless of the specificity of diseases. Common ones are: National Standard Quality of Life Scale, SF- 12, SF-36, EuroQol, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Rother Index and Disease Impact Profile (SIP); ② Clinical quality of life measurement methods, such as RKI(Rosser Kind Index), QWB(Quality of Well-being Scale), 15-D, HUI2and3(Health Utilities Index, MarkIIandIII), IHRQL (health-related quality of life index), qlhq (quality of life questionnaire), AQOL (Australian quality of life scale), eq5-d (euroqol); ③ Quality of life questionnaire for special diseases, such as Parkinson's disease quality of life questionnaire (PDQ-39). Chronic heart failure questionnaire, severe heart failure quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-SHF), diabetes patients' quality of life specificity scale and liver pain patients' quality of life measurement scale (QOL-LC).