Does violating the right to health necessarily violate the right to body?

Legal analysis: violation of the right to health is not necessarily a violation of the right to body. Physical right refers to the right of citizens to maintain their physical integrity and freely control all parts of their bodies. The right to health refers to the personality right of citizens to safeguard the interests of human life activities based on the normal operation and perfect function of their physical and physiological functions, including the right to maintain health, the right to work and the right to mental health. The difference between them lies in: first, the object of body right is body, and the object of health right is health; Second, the benefits embodied in the right of body are the integrity of natural person's body tissues and organs, and the benefits embodied in the right of health are the perfection of natural person's tissues and organs. Third, the body right is the natural person's right to control his own body components, including limbs, organs, blood and so on. The right to health has no obvious dominant position. The right to health is a "concrete material personality right" in personal rights, which refers to the right that human health is not illegally violated.

Legal basis: Civil Code of People's Republic of China (PRC).

Article 103 Natural persons enjoy the right to the body. The personal safety and freedom of movement of natural persons are protected by law. No organization or individual may infringe upon the body rights of others.

Article 104 Natural persons have the right to health. The physical and mental health of natural persons is protected by law. No organization or individual may infringe upon the health rights of others.