Why do you say the blind obedience of LS? It can be seen from what she said. The following is for the convenience of typing and emotional combing. Enter in the form of reply LS.
Little girl, do you know that all the key words in your words are wrong? You misinterpreted the meaning of words to excuse the plagiarist. Not blindly following? Regardless of whether you really understand the meaning of the word, at least you should know that plagiarism is wrong. But you should know the meaning of this word before you speak. If you think there is no plagiarism, then refute the evidence. To prove her innocence. Have you really seen evidence of plagiarism? Have you seen them all? I can tell you didn't. If you read it, you will never misunderstand the meaning of these words.
First of all, there are many sayings about the word "finger", but the general meaning is not much different. And plagiarism are not synonyms. What I said is a reference of experience. To put it in a popular way, we should absorb other people's experience, digest it ourselves and express it in our own language while understanding other people's articles. Not word for word. Moreover, the formal text must indicate where it was borrowed at the end of the text, and must say everything borrowed. For example, in Jin Yong's novels, you can often see the historical materials marked at the end of the article.
Then there is "plagiarism". I don't think there is a more authoritative word than copyright law. The following refers to the copyright law. 》
"1. Plagiarism and plagiarism mentioned in the Copyright Law are the same concept (hereinafter referred to as plagiarism, for the sake of brevity), which refers to the plagiarism of other people's works or pieces of works for their own use. "
"Second, from the form of plagiarism, there are acts of copying other people's works intact or basically intact, and there are also acts of stealing others' original components protected by copyright after a makeover. The former is called low-level plagiarism in the field of copyright law enforcement, and the latter is called high-level plagiarism. "
From the evidence of plagiarism, it can be seen that VI's plagiarism is low-level, which is exactly the same as what the copyright law says. Isn't that enough to prove the nature of her plagiarism?
"What celebrities write is plagiarism?" (reference LS)
This sentence is enough to prove your misinterpretation of plagiarism, and also cite the fourth part of the Copyright Law to prove your misinterpretation of plagiarism.
"Four, the identification of plagiarism, is not whether all or part of the use of other people's works, whether it is well received by the outside world, whether it constitutes a major or substantial part of plagiarism. Anything that constitutes the above elements should be considered plagiarism. "
The meaning of this sentence is obvious. It doesn't matter whether plagiarism is all or part, whether the plagiarist is famous or not, and whether plagiarism is the main part of the article. What you said is putting the cart before the horse. It's a joke.
And "generalize from one part to the whole": forgive me for really not understanding what you mean by using this word. What do you mean, generalize? Is it a "one-sided summary" of VI's article, asking everyone to remove the plagiarized part and pay attention to the part she didn't plagiarize? If so, you don't understand the essence of this word. To generalize is to understand the depth of articles and things. It depends on your understanding of the event, not the whole or part of the article and the event. If you mean that we are partial to the nature of plagiarism. Then I'd like to see your more original idea.
Finally, "quotation": children ~ you all know that ancient poetry is quoted, how can it be equated with plagiarism? It can be seen that your understanding of plagiarism is not generally one-sided.
The meaning of quotation can be seen in the encyclopedia, so I'll show you "When writing an article, deliberately quote existing idioms (idioms, poems, aphorisms, allusions, etc.). ) to express my thoughts and feelings and explain my views on new problems and new principles. This rhetorical method is called quotation. The function of quotation is to make the argument conclusive, convincing and inspiring, and the language is refined, implicit and elegant. " Ask yourself if VI is a literary quotation! ? If you don't understand it thoroughly, you can read the encyclopedia and dictionary yourself and see how the literati use it.
The quotation format is "generally mentioned in the article notes or written directly in the article, and can also be quoted (not required within 20 words)"
You can ignore the format after 20 words. How much evidence is under 20 words? Hmm? Do you still dare to say that she is quoting?
Who is really naive? Look at what you said. I believe that everyone who has seen it will have a judgment.
Don't follow blindly. If you want to support it, you must support the good aspects and the people who deserve it.