Debate: Smoking should be completely banned in public places.

Smoking ban in public places does not mean absolute smoking ban. As for human rights, passive smokers also have human rights. The harm of secondhand smoke need not be discussed. Since it is a public place, it should be open to everyone, not to non-smokers, but to welcome smokers, but not to smoke. Smoking is harmful to health, forcibly suppressing smokers' time and space, and benefiting non-dependent people. It's a compulsory smoking cessation. If you can, you won't harm the children at home, and your merits are boundless. It should be aimed at its harm. Smoking is useless and not worth advocating and conniving at! As we all know, smoking is harmful to health. If it's your own business, why is there an Opium War? This is related to the physical quality of China people. Children in public places are not guided, which may have a great impact on the next generation of smokers. The influence of family is one-on-one and relatively small, especially the role of public figures and idols can not be ignored.