Read the representative's proposal several times, and the reader will first look at the views in the following proposal:
Reasons for price increase 1: The starting point is to protect the physical and mental health of teenagers.
As far as I know, one way for children to take cigarettes is to steal from their parents, and the other is to buy "zero cigarettes" (illegal small businesses will open a box of cigarettes to sell to students)! In addition, most children now have enough spare money to buy a pack of cigarettes for one person or several people!
In this way, the purpose of protecting teenagers seems to have nothing to do with tobacco prices.
Therefore, this proposal either has ulterior motives, or there is no investigation and study at all, so there is no case at leisure and we can discuss it casually!
Reason 2 for price increase: tax practice and PK's foreign experience.
First of all, I'm curious about where the so-called "earmarking" is used! Not clearly pointed out! If the public can accept it, we will fully support it!
Secondly, as I said before, China's national conditions are not better than those of foreign countries, and students can get cigarettes "easily", which has nothing to do with the price of tobacco.
Third, whether tobacco tax is a "heavy tax" to manage household consumption or a "heavy tax" to protect young people seems to be full of contradictions!
Finally, China's tobacco tax, far from foreign PK, must catch up, whether it is suitable for China's national conditions!
If nothing else, we will have as much as others put in! This doesn't count. I wonder if this means that you graduated from primary school. Did your math teacher teach you that? !
Reason 3 for price increase: More delegates talk about experience and support plans.
To borrow teacher Li's words: the price of tobacco has risen to the same level as that of drugs! Do teenagers try to take drugs? Although the views are radical, it shows that our feelings about deputies and deputies' proposals should be "outrageous"!
As mentioned above, the "hidden possibility", "naive algorithm" and the third "numerous support" of the "sky-high price" motivation of tobacco have always been in doubt: have the delegates seen the teenagers in China, and do they know whether they live on Mars? !
Let's look at personal speculation (whether correct or not, it can be deduced anyway):
1, the high "price" of tobacco is suspected of selfish interests of the main business!
A rush of proposals and support, without mentioning China's national conditions at all. Horribly pointing to the first excuse: protecting the health of teenagers!
2, the algorithm is naive enough to make people sneer!
The per capita income of developed countries is 10000, and we may be 5000. The gap is huge, but the final gap should be close and equal!
Finally, make an inappropriate assumption! ! ! ! ! ! If these people make a smog proposal, will it be like this:
1. In order to protect teenagers and raise various taxes of manufacturers who may emit pollution, then they produce less and have less natural pollution?
2, regardless of national conditions, unrestrained PK developed countries' experience in controlling smog!
For example, in Britain in the 1970s, because of the serious industrial pollution in London, the smog could not be dispersed for a long time. In the end, many lives, including animals, plants and people, were ruthlessly taken away. So is it necessary to calculate a proportion, so how many people will die in our country?
Hey, but in a word, all of us have good hopes and wishes to discuss the ultimate ownership. I hope that when the delegates prepare the plan and participate in the discussion, although different groups pay different attention to people's livelihood issues, it is best to seek truth from facts regardless of right or wrong. Otherwise, what do you take away from the representative rights of our sacred NPC and CPPCC? ! !