"Engage in international shipping center, financial center, are not as good as building Disneyland on the Shanghai tourism service industry to promote big." Shanghai Pudong Economic and Trade Bureau, a source said. His view, from the visit to the United States Orlando Disneyland left a deep impression. "Orlando receives 30 million visitors a year, and 80 percent of the city's population of more than 1 million serves Disney directly or indirectly. What do you think Disney will bring to Shanghai?" In his view, Disney's significance is self-evident.
Yang Zhouyi, secretary-general of the Pudong Institute of Development and Reform, believes that in addition to the strong customer support that could directly benefit Shanghai's Disneyland, Disney could also promote the development of Shanghai's manufacturing, retailing, catering and hospitality industries, as well as boosting employment, which would also play an important role in upgrading Shanghai's city image.
Disney has also made no secret of the fact that it is not only interested in Shanghai and the mainland's huge tourist population and strong spending power, but also wants to further expand the company's peripheral products in the Yangtze River Delta region and even in the broader mainland market, including TV, movies and a variety of consumer products. A Disney TV channel is likely to be launched in Shanghai, according to the sources.
"Mainland residents don't need visas to play Disney in Shanghai, and transit passengers from outside the country to Pudong airport can also go visa-free for 48 hours." A Pudong theme park office worker told reporters. The reason why Shanghai Disney cannot open by 2010 is entirely because of the promise the central government had made to Hong Kong.
For Shanghai Disney may form competitive pressure on Hong Kong Disney, Han said: "We hope to form cooperation with Hong Kong, Shanghai and Hong Kong in the framework of CEPA cooperation is going well, cooperation including economic, talent and other aspects. More than 1,000 Hong Kong people have already entered Shanghai to work under the conditions of this framework." (China Business News)
Contest to build Disney behind the development of impatience
Shanghai municipal government spokeswoman Jiao Yang recently on the construction of Disney theme parks in Shanghai to give a clear answer, she said: "Shanghai has the conditions, but also have the desire to build a Disney theme parks, the Shanghai Municipal Government has submitted a report on the relevant applications are awaiting approval from the State Council. approval." (March 16, Oriental) Obviously, this cost more than 30 billion yuan, covers an area of 6 square kilometers of the huge project, just waiting for the State Council's approval of a piece of paper, immediately can be in full swing to start the construction.
As a matter of fact, such a big project should not be just a local government to the central government to build so simple, the local government should first of all to win the consent of the people of Shanghai, especially the site of the public's consent. This is because the Disney theme park will not only cost Shanghai taxpayers a lot of money - money that could have been used to improve the welfare of the citizens; it will also increase traffic congestion in the city, affecting the comfort of urban life; and many people will have to leave their homes, where they have lived for generations, and have their land forcibly expropriated because of nonpublic **** interests (commercial interests). However, I am afraid that the citizens of Shanghai, including those of the site, do not necessarily know about Shanghai's bid to build a Disney theme park any earlier than the people of the whole country do, do they?
If Shanghai's bid to build Disney is still considered "conditional," it is surprising that many cities are competing for the massive $30 billion project. Mr. Zhang Guobao, Deputy Director of the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), said that he had indeed received an application from Shanghai, but other mainland cities had also submitted applications, but he refused to disclose which cities. I am really amazed that Disney is after all only an entertainment project, and mainland cities are so favorable to it that they are willing to invest huge sums of money and large tracts of land, so are there no other development projects to choose from? Or are the people so affluent that not only do they not need the Government to improve their welfare, but they are in dire need of the Government to build entertainment projects to spend the free money in their hands? According to this trend, there are only five Disneyland Resorts in the world, and the mainland is eager to build eight or ten.
Some people say this is an era of "entertainment to the death", but if the government also joins or promotes "entertainment to the death", it is very scary. The so-called "to meet the cultural and sports needs of the people of Shanghai and the rest of the country", should also consider the consumption level of mainland residents, right? How many ordinary working class people can afford the high price of Disney tickets? If only the consumption needs of public money and the rich are actually met, why should "Shanghai residents and people from all over the country" be dragged in as backstops? Moreover, the demand for public money and rich people's consumption can be satisfied by the Disney parks in the world, so why drive the farmers away from the land where they have been eating for generations to satisfy the revelry of the public money and the big spenders?
From the hundreds of mainland cities competing to create "international metropolis", to water-scarce areas and high-temperature areas to build ski resorts; from the golf courses in the city are one or even a few, to the fight to build Disney to engage in a "money-burning contest". --In fact, some local governments really value not the development opportunities, not to mention the improvement of people's living standards, the so-called "to meet the growing spiritual and cultural needs of the people" is a pure pretext, they really want to pursue the What they really want to pursue is the glory of political achievement of "no one has what I have, and what I have is more" - the spirit of "fighting in the dark" and "wanting to save face", so that Round after round of "fashionable performance" wind blowing all over the north and south of the river, the end is a swarm of duplication of construction, a large area of performance projects, the taxpayers' hard contribution is only enough to wipe their asses.
The "make quick money" mentality prevalent in Chinese society has not only exacerbated the bubble economy, but also eroded the spirit of self-improvement and struggle of the Chinese people; the bad thing is that the "make quick money" of leapfrog development is also being desired and chosen by more local governments. This is very obvious in the impulse of local governments to build Disney regardless of the consequences and feasibility. Run the Olympic Games have a serious loss - the Greeks will have to carry the debt for the Olympic Games for nearly 10 years; bid for the construction of Disney is sure to be able to make a lot of money? Not necessarily Disney is really a perpetual money tree? Local governments should really remember: Disney is to make money in China, not to give national welfare. (International Online Shu Shengxiang)
Tourism scholars: Disney can not be blindly introduced
November 28, 2005, in Guangdong, "tourism industrialization of the International Forum", a Guangdong scholar bluntly said: mainland cities should not blindly introduce Disney and other large theme parks, or the local government will bear a huge market risk. The market risk is huge.
Professor Bao Jigang, dean of the School of Tourism at Sun Yat-sen University, gave a keynote speech entitled "Review and Exploration of Guangdong's Tourism Development Strategy" at the forum. Prof. Bao Jigang pointed out that since the opening of Hong Kong Disneyland, visitors have not been as hot as expected. It remains to be seen whether Disneyland has really led the redevelopment of Hong Kong's tourism industry and had a stage-by-stage impact on the competition of tourism in the whole region. My personal view is that the precondition for domestic cities, whether Beijing, Shanghai or Guangdong, to build a large international theme park like Disney is that we cannot take excessive risks.
Professor Paul Jigang said that all the risks of Hong Kong Disneyland, are borne by the Hong Kong SAR Government, the Disney company basically does not bear the market risk, does not bear the investment risk. "If we say, we attract a large international tourism project into China, all the risks are placed on the local government, and eventually will be spread to the head of each taxpayer, I think this kind of introduction is meaningless." Professor Bao Jigang also made a graphic analogy: if we do not have oil, must be imported, because of the relationship between national livelihood; but no Disney, the Chinese people still live a happy life, because we can still have the Spring Festival, Mid-Autumn Festival. (Yangcheng Evening News)
One country, two parks Disney is suspected of abusing the Shanghai-Hong Kong competition for profit?
Some analysts say Disney is only concerned about speeding up the expansion of its business without considering the impact of two parks in one country on regional development, and there is a suspicion of lack of social responsibility
"Disney is in consultation with the Shanghai government to build a theme park in the area." Recently, Disney chief executive Iger himself confirmed the news.
While the news that Disney wants to build a park in Shanghai has been circulating for a few years, it still attracted a lot of attention once it was unilaterally confirmed by Disney.
Disney's 'demands are too high'
After the news was confirmed, Iger and the Shanghai Municipal Government remained tight-lipped about further details of the park's construction.
Iger said that after Hong Kong Disneyland, "we have been discussing with the Chinese government about theme parks. But there is no new progress to report on the construction of a park in Shanghai for the time being."
At the Shanghai Municipal Government's regular press conference on Feb. 8, spokesman Jiao Yang said there was no new material to provide on the issue of "Disney's entry into Shanghai" raised by the media.
The only thing we can say for sure is that even if Disney builds a park in Shanghai, it will have to wait until after 2010. A Hong Kong Disney spokesman noted that a second Disneyland in China would not open for four years.
The more common rumor is that Disney in Shanghai will be located in the town of Chuansha in Pudong, which is about three times larger than the first phase of Hong Kong Disney's expansion.
According to people familiar with the matter, the International Herald Tribune said that Disney had begun to contact and negotiate with Shanghai a decade ago, and that the main reason it had been hanging in the balance was that the conditions had not been properly negotiated.
The specific reasons for Disney's Shanghai plan to be blocked, in September 2002, the People's Daily overseas edition. It reported that "Disney requires that there be no high-rise buildings within a 25-kilometer radius of the theme park, and that most of the restaurants, hotels and entertainment facilities around the park be operated by Disney, which is considered too much to ask on the part of the Shanghai municipal government." "Officials of the Shanghai Municipal Government said that the main reason for the stalemate in the negotiations is that the other party's requirements are too high, and although the Shanghai Municipal Government has repeatedly made concessions, it is still unable to meet the requirements of the Disney Company."
In addition, some industry insiders pointed out that Disney and other theme parks intending to enter China basically choose a model, that is, the main cash invested by the Chinese side, and the Chinese side is also responsible for infrastructure investment; while the foreign side invested in the brand and part of the cash, and collect royalties and management fees from China. Under this model, if the mega theme park is profitable for decades, both Chinese and foreign investors can realize a win-win situation; if the life cycle is shorter, the foreign side will recover its investment through the proceeds of the construction period and the royalties, management fees and share dividends in the first few years of operation, while the Chinese side will bear almost all the risks.
Shanghai advantage
Whether the construction of Disney in Shanghai will affect Hong Kong Disney, Tung Yiu-chung, director-general of the Travel Industry Council of Hong Kong, believes that the construction of Disneyland in Shanghai will have little impact on Hong Kong. Because the positioning and operation mode of the theme parks in the two places may not be the same, and the supporting facilities are not the same, so do not believe that there is a competition problem between the two. There are other unique attractions for Hong Kong tourists and the impact of Disney on Hong Kong should not be over-emphasized.
Su Weiwen, associate dean of the School of Business Administration at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, believes that demand is expected to be able to support two Disneyland parks because of the huge mainland China market and the rapid growth of the mainland economy. The United States also has two Disneyland parks to meet market demand, and "one country, two parks" is a good example.
Some industry insiders also believe that Hong Kong Disneyland will radiate the entire Pearl River Delta, while Shanghai Disneyland will face the affluent Yangtze River Delta, with little competition.
An industry insider from the Guangdong travel agency was informed of the situation is that Hong Kong Disney only in the golden week and the weekend when "prosperous", usually tickets can be sold during the golden week of one-third has been a good performance. Analysts pointed out that Shanghai's geographic location can radiate north and south, more than Hong Kong's radiation surface, coupled with the need to go through customs and other procedures, therefore, Disney in Shanghai to build the park will be able to avoid the Hong Kong Disneyland usually low admission rate of the problem.
Disney's selfishness?
An analyst told the International Herald Tribune, from the Hong Kong Disney during the Spring Festival "refused customers" incident, Disney for the holidays during the spending power of Chinese tourists is clearly underestimated. Once the construction of Disney in Shanghai, this problem will be one of the main obstacles to the smooth development of Disney in China.
And as for Disney's talks with the Shanghai municipal government about building the park, some Hong Kong scholars say mainland China should be cautious. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University China Business Center director Chen Wenhong said, Hong Kong Disneyland opened less than half a year, the first phase of its expansion has not been completed, Disney will negotiate to build additional theme parks in Shanghai, obviously see Shanghai and Hong Kong are interested in building Disneyland, and therefore in the acquisition of the Hong Kong SAR Government to invest more than 20 billion Hong Kong dollars in the construction of Hong Kong Disneyland, it will be to speed up the pace of the construction of another theme park in mainland China. While the operation and ticketing arrangements for Hong Kong Disneyland have yet to be clarified, Disney has only focused on speeding up the expansion of its business without considering the impact of the two theme parks on the development of the region, which is inevitably suspected of lacking a sense of social responsibility.
Chen Wenhong also suggested that, in the country's overall interest, foreign investment should be prevented from "abusing" the city's competition for profit, and that the relevant authorities could regulate the market through the regulation of land or other resources.
Referring to the information, please refer to:
People's lives under the perspective of social change theory --Centered on the changes of Chinese people's daily life in the past 30 years
HIT News (Tang Kuiyu/Wen)
From 1978, when the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee of the Party was held to make the historic decision of reform and opening up, to 2008, the process of modernization in China has lasted for a whole 30 years. There is no doubt that our great motherland has undergone tremendous changes, both in general and in detail. This can be clearly seen by comparing the huge contrast between the rescue capabilities of the state and society during the Tangshan earthquake in 1976 and the "5.12" earthquake in Wenchuan, Sichuan Province this year. After 30 years of reform and opening up, China's comprehensive national strength and social mobilization and emergency response capacity have been greatly improved. This paper will take the people's life under the vision of social change theory as the object of study, and conduct a preliminary sorting and discussion on the changes brought by reform and opening up to the daily life of the people of Fangda China.
I. People's Life in the Process of Reform and Opening-up from the Perspective of Social Change Theory
It is well known that social change is an important concept and category in Western sociological theory. Although people have different views on this, they all, without exception, pay great attention to the issue of social change, and take social change as a macro or micro, dynamic or static social facts to be described and analyzed in depth.
1.Several Concepts on Social Change Theory
According to the American sociology Isis. Robertson in his book "Sociology", the theories of social change put forward by sociologists, historians and anthropologists include evolutionary theory, cyclic theory, functionalist theory and conflict theory. Among them, the social order-oriented functionalist theory advocated by Parsons is more influential. He argued that social change does not disturb social equilibrium but alters it, with the result of creating a new quality of equilibrium, and that the equalizing effects of such social change come from outside and inside society, respectively. And it is argued that social change usually occurs when a society becomes increasingly complex. In his book Social Structure and Social Change, Kenichi Tominaga, a famous Japanese sociologist, argues that "the so-called social change is a change in the structure of a society, i.e., the occurrence of structural change". It should be added that, in Kenichi Tominaga's view, in order to better analyze social change, the premise of social structure analysis cannot be missing. Without consciousness about social structure, the concept of social change cannot be y recognized and fully understood either.
In fact, Sun Liping and other scholars have long been aware of the social structure angle in the doctrinal discussion of social change since the reform. He and his collaborators believe that it is sociologically distinctive to take as a research perspective a series of overall structural transformations or important changes in the process of structural change in Chinese society caused by reform and opening up. One important point of view of Prof. Sun Liping is that he believes that in the overarching social structure of China before the reform the state monopolized almost all the important resources, including people's opportunities for survival and development as well as information resources, and that the state's control over social life was also characterized by considerable arbitrariness. However, after 30 years of reform and opening up, Chinese society is no longer a highly homogeneous society, and the differentiation of the social structure and the increase of marketization have made the daily life of the Chinese people more and more diversified and modernized in the characteristics of social change.
2. Changes in people's living structure during the process of reform and opening up
The "living structure" here refers to a broadly defined "living system" of modern people. It includes not only the hidden concept of life, but also the outwardly visible life field, life action and life mode or life style. Obviously, if we agree that the essence of Marx's historical materialist social theory of the inter-construction of production and life is the main driving force of human social change, then there is no reason why we should not pay attention to the issue of sustainable development behind the life choices and quality of life that human beings have encountered during the process of social modernization. For this reason, when we conduct theoretical reflection on the changes in social life caused by China's reform and opening-up, we must firmly grasp the "practice of daily life". Both Mr. Huang Zongzhi and Mr. Sun Liping have put forward the concept of "practice" in their reflections on China's changes. Mr. Huang Zongzhi, in his article "Understanding China" published in the journal Social Sciences in China in 2005, compared the similarities and differences between the two: Sun Liping's "practice" is mainly relative to the system, whereas his "practice" is more inclined to theories and representations; Sun Liping's "practice" mainly refers to the "process-event" of market transformation, while he himself refers to the long-term historical changes of the whole modern era.
In the process of the Chinese people's increasingly rich and diversified "life practice", there is always a thread running through it, that is, the "life practice" of building a moderately affluent society in an all-round way. And as Li Wurong, Hu Debao and other scholars said: "building a moderately prosperous society is a vast systematic project, but ultimately ends up in improving people's living standards." Comprehensive well-off living standard is a broad, comprehensive and systematic category. It includes all aspects of the economy, politics, society, culture, environment and people's lives. Specifically, it should include seven major indicators: economic development, material consumption life, social progress, population quality, social security and social safety, ecological environment and health. These standards reflect important aspects of the structural changes in people's lives during the reform and opening-up process, and are our future focus for evaluating and guiding people's daily life practices.
It must be emphasized that the changes in people's lives in the process of reform and opening up, in addition to being influenced by factors such as marketization and technologization, are also determined by the basis of the living environment provided by the country's level of economic and social development. Unlike 30 years ago, China has become the world's fourth largest economy after the United States, Japan and Germany, which means that China's national capacity has reached an unprecedented level. According to statistics, in 2007, China's GDP had reached 24,661.9 billion yuan, and its per capita GDP had also reached US$2,460. This has undoubtedly become an important symbol that the reform and opening up has entered a turning point and put China on a new historical starting point. The Chinese government's tremendous national capacity, demonstrated by the Wenchuan earthquake in 2008 and the Beijing Olympics, as well as its "people-oriented" spirit and open-mindedness, provide a good background for the changes in the lives of the Chinese people.
II. Changes in Chinese People's Daily Life from the Sorting out of Life History
In the past 30 years since the reform and opening up, China's residents' life has made two historic leaps from poverty to subsistence, from subsistence to well-off, and the people's material life as a whole has gradually shifted from quantitative satisfaction to qualitative improvement, and gradually shifted from consumption of mainly means of subsistence to consumption of mainly means of development and enjoyment, as well as political life, political life, spiritual and cultural life and leisure life have become increasingly rich, social mobility is active, values are open, and a modernized socialist way of life is gradually being established as we enter a new period of building a moderately prosperous society in all respects and a harmonious socialist society. The dual transformation of the economic structure and institutional model since the reform and opening up has brought about great changes in the social life of Chinese cities. The following will explore the changes that have taken place in the daily life of the Chinese people from the overall social context by combing the life history of the six daily life areas: clothing, food, housing, transportation, use and communication.
1. Clothing: From Warmth to Personalization
In the past 30 years, the fastest and biggest change in the consumer life of urban and rural residents has been in clothing. Not only the number of clothing increased significantly, and wearing quality improved significantly, clothing function from the past simple cover body cold evolved to reflect the personalized aesthetic awareness and shape the self-image. People's clothing raw materials and texture to improve the rate of ready-to-wear clothing is also increasing, buy raw cloth to do their own clothes to reduce the number of. At the beginning of reform and opening up, China's annual production of clothing only an average of one per person, but today's high-end shopping malls, brand-name stores in a wide range of international brand-name clothing, a variety of brands, different styles of clothing to compete, so that China's residents clothing beautiful and colorful.
2. Food: from enough to eat well
This change, first of all, in the proportion of food consumption decreased, indicating that people no longer worry about eating enough. And in the internal composition of food consumption, the consumption of corn, sorghum, sweet potatoes and other coarse grains fell significantly, while the consumption of rice, wheat and other fine grains rose. While the proportion of consumption of staple food declined, the proportion of consumption of side dishes, especially animal food, increased significantly, and while the consumption of raw food declined relatively, the consumption of processed food, especially flavorful, curative and convenient food rose.
3. Housing: from overcrowded to comfortable and spacious
The housing of urban residents, from the lack of housing, overcrowded and gradually to the more spacious, more comfortable direction. 1978, the per capita living area of urban residents was only 6.7 square meters in 2005, increased to 26.1 square meters, an increase of 2.9 times. The quality and compatibility of housing has also continued to improve. By the end of 2000, 68.3 per cent of urban households were living in housing units; 74 per cent had toilets and bathrooms, 84.2 per cent had gas or liquefied petroleum gas, and 41.1 per cent had air-conditioning or other heating equipment. The average area of housing used by rural residents per household increased from 8.1 square meters at the end of 1978 to 30.7 square meters at the end of 2006, an increase of 2.8 times, and 81 percent of the per capita housing area was brick and wood and reinforced-concrete structures, with the quality of the housing constantly improving.
4. Transportation: from closed and restricted to comfortable and fast
With the rapid development of various transportation facilities, China's transportation construction has been greatly developed, basically forming a comprehensive transportation network with railroads as the backbone and highways, water transportation and civil aviation as its components. The urban public transportation undertakings in various places have made great development, the ownership of highway automobiles increased from 107,600 in 1990 to 1,619,200 in 2006, the ownership of private automobiles increased from 284,900 in 1985 to 233,332,200 in 2006, the mileage of subway openings has been continuously extended, and the cabs are available at any time of the day. All these have greatly facilitated the traveling conditions of the residents, making their lives more comfortable and faster than in the past.
5. Use: from a shortage of materials to a wide range of supplies
The consumption of supplies by urban and rural residents has shown a trend of transforming from non-durable consumer goods to durable consumer goods, from daily necessities and other means of subsistence to color TVs, refrigerators, air conditioners, microcomputers and other means of development and enjoyment, and from single-function, low-grade supplies to high-tech, multifunctional, medium- and high-grade supplies. At the same time, urban and rural residents have significantly accelerated the replacement of household goods, experiencing a shift from the "old four" to the "new six". In recent years, they have begun to shift to new consumer "hot spots" represented mainly by telephones, home computers, commercial housing, and family cars. Consumer durables a lot of "flying into the common people's homes", is an important symbol of urban and rural residents to significantly improve the standard of consumption and living.
Three, from the scientific concept of development to examine the current daily life of the Chinese people
Reform and opening up 30 years, China's economic and social development has made great achievements in history, the victory of the modernization of the construction of the "three-step" strategy of the first step, the second step target, the people's life in general has reached the level of moderately affluent. However, the level of well-being now achieved is still low, incomplete, and very uneven. There is an insurmountable barrier between this and the development concept advocated by the scientific concept of development, which is "people-oriented, realizing comprehensive, coordinated and sustainable economic and social development". Examining the disharmony in the daily life of Chinese people from the perspective of the scientific concept of development will be of great significance to the construction of a benign lifestyle in the future, which aims at the comprehensive development of human beings.
1. Economic conditions constrain the comprehensive development of human beings
Experience over the past 30 years of reform and opening up has proved that in order to improve productivity, it is necessary to develop a market economy, and the existence of commodities and monetary relations, in addition to the positive effects on human development, will also bring about negative effects, which can be summarized in the following aspects:
First of all, a market economy may breed money-worshippers
First, the market economy may breed money worship, which leads to the corruption of human beings. As the market economy to material interests as the basic pursuit, which may lead to the market competition in the phenomenon of seeing things do not see people. Under the conditions of market economy, the economic relationship between man and man is expressed in the form of commodities, money and other things, and under certain conditions, commodities and money may turn into a powerful force not subject to the will of man, and in turn dominate man, making him fall before them and become their slaves.
Secondly, the market economy may lead to the expansion of individualism and the indifference of interpersonal relations. The market economy is a rights-based economy of subject independence and personal autonomy, under which the private sphere of man expands and the time, space and financial resources available for discretionary use relatively increase, so that the sense of self and the sense of rights can develop. The market economy's principle of equivalence and exchange may turn the harmonious relations of friendship, care, and affection between human beings into relations of bare things. The law of competition in the market economy may lead to one-sidedness in personal development and alienation of personality.
Finally, the market economy may lead to the polarization of the rich and the poor, and widen the development gap between adults. People due to the differences in various conditions may put them in completely different positions in the market competition, the market competition may be like a match between different levels of boxers, the strong stronger, the weaker phenomenon, the formation of a serious polarization of the rich and the poor, so that the development of individuals and groups in a disadvantageous position is constrained and adversely affected.
2. The superstructure constrains the comprehensive development of human beings
Since the reform and opening up, China's economic system reform, political system reform and cultural system reform has been deepening, and has made great achievements that have attracted world attention, and played a great role in promoting the comprehensive development of human beings. However, our achievements are still preliminary, and many problems and weaknesses remain, both in China's socialist economic, political and cultural system itself and in the implementation of socialist economic, political and cultural policies. In the economic field, the unreasonable distribution system seriously affects the enthusiasm of workers; in the political field, democracy and the rule of law, especially the legal system adapted to the socialist market economy, are not yet sound enough, affecting the better realization of human rights and values; in the cultural field, the education system, which is divorced from the reality, seriously affects the all-round development of human beings.
After the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee, along with the profound reflection on the Cultural Revolution and the restoration of the ideological line of "emancipation of the mind and seeking truth from facts", the issue of human beings began to receive attention, and gradually became a compelling field of study. However, to this day, the question of human beings is considered to be the most important one. However, to this day, the tendency of "nihilism" that the comprehensive development of human beings cannot be advanced or is impossible to realize at this stage still exists; the one-sided understanding that the theory of comprehensive development of human beings is only a theory of socialist education still exists; the erroneous concept that only attaches importance to economic development but not to the development of human beings and environmental protection has not yet been thoroughly clarified; the concept that only attaches importance to professional education but not to the development of human beings and environmental protection has not yet been completely clarified. The erroneous concept of attaching importance only to economic development and not to human development and environmental protection has not yet been thoroughly clarified; and the erroneous understanding of attaching importance only to professional education and not to humanistic education has not yet been thoroughly corrected. All these one-sided understandings and wrong practices have, to a certain extent, hindered the development of socialist economy, politics and culture, and also affected the historical process of comprehensive development of human beings.
3. People's own conditions constrain their comprehensive development
From the point of view of people's own conditions, their comprehensive development is mainly constrained by three factors, namely, their own qualities, living standards and spiritual needs.
(1) the person's own quality
We see the current quality of China's people have generally improved compared to the past at the same time, we should also be sober to see that, compared with the developed countries, our gap is still quite obvious. From the perspective of the overall development of human beings, the current gap in the quality of China's people are mainly manifested in the following two aspects:
First, the quality of thought. Most of our population's ideological quality is basically adapted to the natural, semi-natural economy of the old system of concepts, the new market economic system is generally poorly adapted to the concept of commodities, the concept of the market economy, the concept of competition and so on is still relatively weak.
Second, the quality of science and culture. First, the population quality level is generally low, higher education is relatively backward, the shortage of high-level talent. Secondly, whether it is family education, or school education or social education, all only pay attention to the score, but varying degrees of neglect of physical training, quality cultivation, appeared in a wide range of "lack of morality" education, as well as high scores and low ability. Third, the quality structure of the population is unreasonable. Highlighted in the serious shortage of rural professional and technical personnel resources; with the development of export-oriented economy to match the engineering and technical personnel, technology and management personnel, financial and trade personnel and high-tech development of a general shortage of talent. In particular, the gap between urban and rural population quality is large, and the low quality of the rural population has become an outstanding contradiction in the process of China's socialist modernization.
(2) People's standard of living
While fully recognizing that people's living standards have been greatly improved, we should also be soberly aware that there are still many problems in China's people's standard of living: First, the urban poor population is on the rise. Due to rising prices in recent years, some retirees' real living standards have declined, and the burden on some low-income workers has become increasingly heavy after the introduction of various reforms. Second, the quality of the main body of residents and the ability to create a new way of life is not high, many people's spare time monotonous, lack of hobbies, no sense of pioneering, self-enclosed, often passive pass time. Thirdly, the consumption structure of urban and rural residents failed to improve with the level of consumption and timely and reasonable adjustments, residents' consumption behavior is unreasonable and irrational.
(IV. Short Conclusion
In summary, we have analyzed the history of people's life under the vision of social change theory in both macro and micro levels, centering on the changes in the daily life of the Chinese people in the past 30 years after the reform and opening up. We are soberly aware that, although there are individual life factors influencing people's daily life practices, it should be said that the life system and life landscape of the Chinese people in the past 30 years, as well as their future life tendency, are the results of being supported or will be supported by the living conditions and social civilization environment provided by the great achievements of reform and opening up. Therefore, no matter as a social change or as a change of lifestyle, Chinese people's life practice will inevitably be marked with the color and history of the reform and opening up era. We should have enough social consciousness about this. More importantly, we need to integrate with the historical process of reform and opening up and the spirit of the times when constructing a diversified Chinese social lifestyle that is sustainable, healthy and full of happiness in the future.