Buy foreclosed cell phone memory shrinkage, auction court: returnable, freight paid, this is unreasonable, first of all, this way there is a deceptive behavior, secondly, is not conducive to the parties to a sense of experience, and then it is a credibility of the court, in addition to the court's publicity work there is a problem. Need to elaborate from the following four aspects to analyze the buy foreclosure cell phone memory shrinkage? Auction method court: can be returned, freight paid, which is unreasonable for specific reasons.
A, this looks like the existence of deception?
First of all, this is the existence of deceptive behavior, for the people concerned the reason why the corresponding court will determine the existence of deceptive behavior is the phone's memory information is the basic information of the phone if there is not so much memory can not be that exaggerated propaganda, the damage to the interests of consumers.
The second is not conducive to a sense of experience
The second is not conducive to a sense of experience, the reason why the parties attach great importance to the sense of experience is because the purchase of goods is a cell phone, so for a lot of people the reason why they will be utilizing the corresponding cell phone to the office is to hope that she will have to run efficiently can be kept up with. The company has been able to keep up with this.
Three, will affect the credibility of the court?
Again, the court's credibility will be affected, the court will affect the development of its own credibility is that his publicity involves some false elements, which is required to pay a certain amount of civil liability, because it has misled consumers to buy.
Four, the court's publicity work problems?
Additionally, the court's publicity work is problematic for the court's publicity work is problematic for its own publicity supervision has not been done, which will make the consumer in the belief that the goods are good value for money in the case of the initiative to buy, which is very wrong behavior.
The court should do the precautions:
The court should take the initiative to recover the cell phone, and bear the corresponding freight costs, because it has nothing to do with the consumer, the court needs to take responsibility.