1. Introduction. Preface is a paragraph at the beginning of the review of academic papers. Clarify the author's reasons for writing, significance and purpose, or introduce the historical origin of this paper, the development of the background, or explain the nature of this paper and the scope of adaptation. Requirements from the rules of writing, it should be the beginning, with concise, direct method and text to open the theme, and can clearly explain the basic content and scope of the topic of the review, as well as the review of the topic of the academic value and practical value, but also requires the author to briefly address the problem to be solved. These requirements, often due to the author of the purpose of writing and focus on different.
2. Main body. The main body is the core part of the review. From the content of the writing should generally include the historical evolution, analysis of the current situation, tendency to predict the three parts of the content. If the historical evolution of the narrative using a vertical comparison method, the current situation analysis is used in a horizontal comparison. Historical evolution of the issue under study is mostly some **** understanding or have solved the problem that the results or conclusions obtained to be summarized, and in chronological order to briefly explain the development of the various stages of the situation and characteristics, through the history of the comparison to illustrate the level currently reached. The analysis of the current situation is to reveal unresolved problems or differences in people's understanding of an issue. Such revelation requires accuracy and objectivity. Convergence prediction gives the reader insights so that those working on the subject can see the direction of future research on the subject.
In the main part of the text of the writing, pay special attention to the subject of the research has not yet solved the problem of the narrative, to try to be detailed and clear. Because the reader pays more attention to this information. These issues constitute the focus of future research work, while paying attention to the horizontal comparison, should focus on certain breakthrough research results and its successful experience. In pointing out the various research methods, approaches and results, should make a summary of the characteristics, and give a proper evaluation, the advantages and disadvantages should be analyzed clearly.
3. Conclusion. Conclusion should be briefly summarized in the main part of the main content of the basis, put forward the author's personal insights, views and the future direction of development is what, should be able to inspire the reader.
4. References. References is an indispensable part of the structure of the review of academic papers. Cited references should be the author personally read the original text, should also choose the most important and latest representative literature.