My view is that it is politicians who are "warming" the earth.
Let's start with the scientific theory of how the Earth's climate is changing.
The climate is not warming, and it appears from the history of the planet that the next twenty years should be a steady cooling of temperatures, so the propaganda coming in that CO2 is causing global warming is a lie
From the study of ice sheet samples, it is possible to calculate the temperatures and the amount of carbon in the atmosphere in the different years of history. The findings are that there have been multiple ice ages and high temperature periods on the planet, but there is a clear difference between this and the level of carbon dioxide. Historically, temperatures have always peaked centuries after the carbon dioxide levels peaked, but after the carbon dioxide peaked, the temperatures had already gradually tended to cool down the process.
The researchers concluded that during periods of high temperatures, large amounts of carbon dioxide are released from the oceans as temperatures gradually rise, causing high levels of carbon dioxide, and that the release of carbon dioxide stops when temperatures gradually fall, until it is not released, and then finally it begins to be "recycled", and that is why the high and low temperatures are related to the high and low temperatures, as well as the high levels of CO2. The temperature is different from the carbon dioxide content, and the carbon dioxide content is slowly changing with the temperature.
Theoretically, carbon dioxide is indeed a "heat preservation gas", but I would like to point out that the amount of carbon dioxide emitted by human beings is in fact very insignificant, and the amount of carbon dioxide occupying the atmosphere is 0.054%, and the amount of carbon dioxide produced in the process of decay of bacteria and leaves is about 150 billion tons per year. Every year, the amount of carbon dioxide produced by bacterial and leaf decay is about 150 billion tons, and the amount of carbon dioxide produced by human-related activities, including respiration and automobile exhaust, is 6.5 billion tons per year, which is a figure that is much less than the amount of carbon dioxide produced by volcanic eruptions every year. So, I think it's pretty ridiculous to talk about carbon dioxide, and especially human behavior emitting carbon dioxide to trigger a climate catastrophe, in light of these two factors.
Concluding from the above then, if the information I have been given is correct, then climate has nothing to do with CO2.
If this is the case, then why does the climate go hot and cold? Why are there hot periods and ice ages?
The leading experts interviewed by the BBC think so.
The universe is full of cosmic rays, which originate from supernova explosions. The rays travel through the atmosphere, and since more than 70% of the Earth's surface is water, the cosmic rays enter the oceans in large quantities, triggering the separation of water molecules, which evaporate into water vapor and enter the atmosphere, where the water vapor collects to form clouds.
And the water gas gathered into the cloud, is very good insulation gas. Solar radiation shot to the ground will be reflected, if it is in the absence of clouds, will be directly reflected back to the universe, but if there is a cloud, laying the reflection of the way, it will be intercepted by the clouds, from the new reflection back to the earth, which plays a role in insulation.
But although the "supply" of cosmic rays is stable, there is still a factor, which is the solar wind.
When sunspots erupt, the stronger the solar wind. The solar wind scatters the cosmic rays near the Earth. With fewer cosmic rays, there is less water in the Earth's atmosphere, and with less water, the clouds are thinner, and the thinner clouds lack insulation, and the Earth's climate becomes cold.
The sunspot outbreaks, on the other hand, have a certain pattern.
Based on observations of the sun, up until 2000, sunspot activity was not very frequent, but in the last few years there has been greater activity, and I don't know if this could be related to volcanoes and earthquakes, but don't you think it has been a little bit cold this winter?
From the real historical data, from the end of WWII, to '75, the period of time, the global climate was gradually getting colder, and then from '75, to 2000, the period of time, the climate was warming up, and from 2000 onwards, and especially in the past few years, the climate didn't continue to warm up, and some experts believe that the climate has gradually begun to get colder. (And from this data, we can see that after the end of World War II was a period of industrial recovery, carbon dioxide emissions do not take into account the climate, the result is that the climate has become colder, which is even more indicative of carbon dioxide has nothing to do with the climate hot or cold)
Combined with the above, I think that the process of warming the climate is, in fact, the earth's climate is a normal change in the earth's climate, and that, historically, the earth has had a period of time that was warmer than it is now, and that is the Middle Ages. It was the Middle Ages, a time when the world society was quite affluent and most of the well-known churches in Europe were built in that era, while in China, it was experiencing the peak of feudal society - the Kaiyuan Shengshi! Also during the Industrial Revolution was the famous Ice Age in history, when the Thames was frozen over and vendors often set up store on the ice in winter. I think the temperature change is as normal as there are four seasons in a year
So you may wonder why there is no problem with the climate and why the slogan "low carbon" is so loud now?
Then I'll tell you, the Copenhagen Conference, said to save the Earth's meeting, in fact, is the economically developed countries in order to limit the development of developing countries, and the political intrigue, the environment, just to be utilized.
The global climate problem, originated in Britain, the advocate is the famous first female prime minister of Britain, Margaret Thatcher, because she was running for office, the phenomenon of acid rain in the United Kingdom, from which she put forward the deterioration of the global environment, the protection of the global environment of the election campaign slogan, this slogan just to cater to the people of the two psychological, one is after World War II, because of the existence of the atomic bomb, mankind has a huge power of its own First, after World War II, because of the existence of the atomic bomb, mankind's blind realization of its own enormous power, thinking that it could destroy the earth; second, the fear of "its own enormous power", fear of being destroyed by its own power in turn. Thatcher utilized this slogan and became the first British Prime Minister. And it will certainly be widely utilized by politicians in various political and economic fields, especially the economy.
The world economy is like a plate of water, and the countries of the world are like plates holding the water. If you end flat plate, then the water content of the various parts of the plate is the same, if you do not end flat, then it is inevitable that a part of the plate to get more water, a part of the place to get less water, and the United States as the leader of the big countries, I hope that the plate can be tilted, and their own get a little more water.
So, the big countries have thrown out the "energy saving, low carbon, environmental protection," the flag of justice, and the slogan shouted loud and clear, shouted justice, the environmental protection as the moral high ground, they can "hostage the environment of this son of God and order not the minister", who do not listen to him, he can be used to sanction you, and is the first time in the world that you have to use this. Whoever does not listen to him, he can use this to sanction you, and the means can be very brutal, just as the medieval churchmen punished the infidels, they can use fire. You have to understand, reduce carbon dioxide emissions for developing countries, it means a decline in production, economic development slowed down, your development is slow, the United States and other developed countries, the advantage of the more obvious, the economy of this plate of "water", will be reversed to the side of the United States, the United States of America's "water" will naturally increase. The "water" of the United States will naturally increase.
The United States, as the largest victor of World War II, has successfully divided the post-World War II economy, the content of which is that Africa, Asia, South America export raw materials, cheap roughly processed commodities, led by the United States of America, the first and second world countries (North America, Western Europe) is responsible for the logistics, advertising and marketing, design, packaging, retail. The final product, digested by their own countries, or re-exported to developing countries, which, the export of raw materials has been the product of roughing the most meager profits, and logistics, advertising and marketing, design, packaging, retail profits are the most lucrative, so the Western powers of the country affluent, we are poor. This is the United States as the leader of the developed countries in the West carefully planned.
But developing countries do not have to be satisfied with the status quo, are trying to find ways to develop, but if the developing countries develop to the point of destroying the Western developed planning of the world's economic pattern, then the West will not be tolerated anymore. They have crafted the "protection of the world's environment", a scam that will go down in history as one of the greatest frauds of all time!
In addition to this, there are more realistic problems, after the financial crisis in the United States, a large number of unemployed people, how to deal with the employment rate, is a big problem on the desk of Obama, Obama himself is a representative of the blue-collar class, so naturally, we need to increase the number of workers in the workforce, to this end, the United States has played two heavy fist.
The first heavy fist, hit Japan, is the Japanese Toyota incident, the United States through the crackdown on Toyota and other Japanese high-grade goods, reducing the sales of imported high-grade, reducing the cost of U.S. goods, increasing the sales of U.S. goods and profits, this is not here to say more, you can find out for yourself.
The second blow was a heavy blow to China. As a result of the increase in the automotive industry as the first industry is not enough to meet the U.S. employment rate, but also not up to Obama's promise to increase the commitment of 3 million jobs, so there is a need to increase the new economic growth, the United States will target the energy-saving environmentally friendly new energy industry. But the U.S. must also ensure that the production of energy-saving new energy products have a place to sell, the U.S. on the target set in China.
First, the U.S. played a false punch, asking for the appreciation of the yuan.
So the appreciation of the yuan, what is the benefit to the U.S. On the surface, this is the U.S. in order to limit China's exports, so that U.S. buyers to buy China's cheap goods cost higher, so that the purchasing attention turned back to the country, so that the U.S. own factories will be opened.
However, this is fatal for Chinese companies, which will have to close down if the yuan is raised by just another 5-7%, and the US is hoping for a 30% appreciation of the yuan, which is basically asking Chinese companies to die.
After that, the U.S. threatened to list China as an "exchange rate manipulator" and succeeded in convincing the European Union*** to put pressure on China.
But the U.S. did not do all this to put China to death immediately, his real purpose is to drag China to the negotiation table to negotiate, and increase the bargaining chips.
As expected, China really came back to the negotiating table and did exactly what the Americans wanted. China and the United States reached the following *** knowledge
1, the United States no longer mention the appreciation of the yuan; 2, the United States to consider recognizing China as a market economy (see clearly, is to consider, and did not say how long to consider); 3, there is a Chinese contribution, the United States "to help" China to manufacture three third-generation technology nuclear power plants (China now has a safer and more economical fourth-generation nuclear energy products). safer and more economical Generation IV nuclear energy products).
Said here, you should understand it, the United States of America's this heavy fist, in fact, for the United States of America's energy-saving new energy products, to find a buyer, and is to force others to buy, this year, the United Kingdom in order to obtain the privilege of doing business in China to fight the Opium Wars, essentially no difference.
So, my point is that the so-called climate crisis does not exist at all, what exists is the confrontation between countries, politicians are always dark, this is still a weak world. If there really is a climate crisis, it refers to the economically developed countries, led by the United States, creating the illusion of climate deterioration to exploit us developing countries. In fact, society is now nominally trying to protect the environment, but what it is actually doing is destroying the environment. The material used in solar panels is polysilicon, which is very environmentally destructive in the manufacturing process, and it is this type of thing that is the real source of our environmental crisis; garbage sieges and water pollution are the real culprits that threaten us and the natural world! Not CO2.
In defense of our economy (and not the environment), I suggest that what we, as a common citizen, do and where we can help our country is this: all things being equal, let's go buy domestic goods as much as we can and spend money in domestic businesses and enterprises, so that the people's wealth stays in the country instead of being made away by foreigners. Let our domestic enterprises to make more money, they are in a position to give their employees more wages, with more wages, in order to promote consumption more, revitalize China's retail industry, making China's economy into a virtuous cycle, so that our economy will be more developed, each of us can benefit from the Chinese people, our country in the foreign negotiation, there is more backbone! As for the environment, I just hope the government can solve the water pollution and garbage siege as soon as possible!
Knowledge and ideas are learned, the article is written, right or wrong, we have our own answer in mind, although I am not a scientist, but I personally still prefer this answer.