The concluding speech is a link to summarize and sublimate the normal debate, which many people will ignore. At this point, they think the game is over. In fact, the conclusion is very important In the process of summing up, we should actually talk less about theory, and these things and reasons should be finished in the opening argument of a debate draft. In the summary draft, we should pay more attention to the integrity of the article and impress the judges and the audience with more emotional words. Because I don't know what your argument is, I can't determine the general direction of the summary. In short, we should adhere to the idea of one-on-one debate, focusing on emotional cards. For example, your debate mentioned the problem of children with cerebral palsy. What I want to know is, what is the so-called giving up? Give up their treatment or their training? Anyway, it will be good for you to let children with cerebral palsy live a relaxed and free life, instead of being manipulated like a pair of medical devices or puppets in so-called intellectual training toys all day. You should try to go into the heart of a simple child and feel what he really likes and wants, so as to impress the people present and render the effect. Finally, a friendly reminder, at the beginning of concluding your speech, you should first make a summary of the situation under Taiwan, sort out and reiterate the loopholes exposed by the other party, and then start your own manuscript. In the process of debate, always remember your position and never be snatched away by the other side. After answering the other person's question, you must add your own question to fight back, so as to ensure your firm position. Therefore, to prepare a lot of questions, a large part depends on improvisation. The examples are arranged into small sections, which can be used when answering questions or thrown as your own questions, and the application is very flexible.
Finally, I wish you success.