First of all, what is preexcitation syndrome? That is, the heart has an extra conductive fiber, which is reflected on the electrocardiogram, that is, a weak ECG signal is superimposed. This is like how long a person has had a mole. Some moles will develop into malignant tumors, and some moles will not affect it.
According to medical professional knowledge, there are three kinds of preexcitation syndrome: ① Preexcitation is asymptomatic, which does not affect study and work at all and does not need treatment. Usually no symptoms. ② Preexcitation has symptoms, and it belongs to frequent attacks, characterized by rapid heartbeat. ③ Preexcitation has complications. There are other complications in the heart. According to the physical examination standard, it is obviously in line with 1 for asymptomatic people with pre-excitation, but there are restrictions in the operation manual. This is both contradictory and unfair. What's the problem? The key to the problem is the difference between preexcitation and preexcitation syndrome. Strictly speaking, it is not preexcitation syndrome, but merely preexcitation phenomenon, which does not conform to the definition of "syndrome", that is, "syndrome, in medical terms, refers to a group of typical signs or symptoms of animal and plant diseases, dysfunction, pathological changes or injuries." It's not a group, but an ECG signal is superimposed, and there is no symptom combination, so it's not a group. ② ③ It is the real preexcitation syndrome, otherwise the physical examination standard and physical examination manual contradict each other.
The standard manual was developed by a small group of experts. In order to popularize pre-excited radiofrequency ablation and obtain high surgical expenses, they have made great efforts in this regard, because the success rate of this operation is very high, and few people will come to perform unlimited surgery. Question: Can the restrictions on pre-excitation in the physical examination manual stand the test of medical professional knowledge? The answer is no! ! Can it stand the test of medical experts from all over the world? The answer is no way! ! ! ! The risk of pre-excitation surgery is not afraid of 10 thousand, but just in case. In case of death during the operation, what is the difference between this and physical examination standard murder?
Others will question: may this symptom appear in the future? For more than 20 years, there is no problem in pre-stimulating the life of people without barriers. How much impact can the future have? This kind of questioning is purely groundless. According to this possibility, a very small number of experts may be electrocuted, killed in a car accident in a crowded city, suffocated by drinking water carelessly, or even died of respiratory failure after exercise, which may not stand scrutiny at all.
Let's analyze the influence of radiofrequency ablation on pre-excitation through medical professional knowledge, so as to judge whether pre-excitation is serious. In the electrophysiological examination and calibration of surgery, the catheter entering the heart from blood vessels will be repeatedly stimulated in the heart, which will induce the onset of preexcitation syndrome. If it is dangerous, the patient is likely to die, which contradicts the statistics that the success rate of surgery exceeds 95%. If it is serious, can there be so many motivations to post on the Internet? If it were serious, these ex-exciters would have died long ago? It can be seen that preexcitation is not serious at all, even after the attack.
Why are there medical examination restrictions? This should be analyzed from the effect that can be achieved by limiting pre-excitation in the standard manual. Medical equipment costs a lot. Restricting preexcitation syndrome when establishing physical examination standards can make the hospital get high surgical expenses and recover the cost. In addition, medical treatment has high requirements for clinical trials. Restricting preexcitation syndrome can force many preexcitation personnel to become doctors' experimental samples, thus improving the level of cardiac surgery in hospitals across the country as a whole. The success rate of this operation is as high as 95%. If the medical examination is limited, the reward is huge.
No one does not make mistakes, even political parties, scientists and super-brain Einstein are no exception. Aren't hospital doctors responsible for this problem? In the unreasonable system implementation, it is hard to blame. Hospital doctors, jumping to conclusions without conscience, hurt heaven and harm reason, God forbid! ! !
When more and more people find that hospitals have no ethics and no conscience to draw conclusions on this issue, doctors' benevolence will be gone. When the mask of unkindness and injustice is torn off, people who know the truth will not donate blood, let alone thank hospitals and doctors. The so-called "justice lies in people's hearts", and the truth is sent out for more people to see and let the people of the whole country judge.