To talk about this problem, we must first explain that the problem should be from the perspective of treating patients. From the hospital's point of view, the higher the natural technology, the more profits, which is meaningless.
After determining this foundation, it is necessary to explain what is "more important". Because both are very important, remember not to give extreme examples of poor service or poor technology in the debate. If the other person gives or uses a similar view, you can refute him immediately: such an example is unrealistic and meaningless.
Since we can't give extreme examples, how should we compare them?
Sorry, I have to disconnect. . Go online tomorrow. Go on.
I used my cell phone. If we want to say why service is more important, we must explain that the patient's environment and mood are extremely important to the patient's rehabilitation. And this is all determined by the service. For most patients, in fact, their illness does not require too advanced technology. Ordinary township hospitals can cure colds, fevers and headaches, not to mention municipal hospitals. Only a few patients need to be treated in excellent hospitals, which means that good service is what most patients need. In other words, for most patients, if a hospital can improve the quality of medical staff, improving the quality of service is obviously much better than introducing a new treatment equipment, and the cost is lower for the hospital.
This is not to say that a few incurable patients are not. For them, although good technology will increase the probability of recovery, any disease is closely related to people's state. I've never heard of anyone who takes expensive medicine but suffers all day. But there are many examples of being happy every day without deliberately treating diseases (this can be found as an example)
On the other hand, different levels of hospitals have their own functions. For example, rural clinics cannot be required to cure all diseases, which is a waste of resources. And a big city is bound to have many large hospitals with superb technology, so it is even more important to improve the service quality under the condition that the technical scope of each hospital is limited.
The compressed synthesis of the above viewpoints can be regarded as four debates. For the question of two or three debates, you can ask, "Imagine that a cold patient who only needs to inject ordinary drugs that can't be ordinary will hope that the hospital will have higher technology or better service before entering the hospital?" Similar problems show that most patients care more about service. You can also cite the example I mentioned earlier. I am very happy and recovered, which shows that technology cannot absolutely cure patients, but a good mood is a necessary condition for health.
The above is what I can think of for the time being, and the rush of time may not be comprehensive. Please forgive me.