Are you looking for an attorney in traffic accidents? Or what? Let me show you the next traffic lawyer's case first, then you can decide.
People's Court Newspaper case selected notes of the traffic accident category (as of 2012-02-26)
Directory (***50 cases)
(a) to not inform the refusal to claim, the loss is determined to be compensated
(b) the insurance contract is not clear, the mental loss to get a claim
(c) unlicensed driving to clear the garbage and hit and killed people. (d) a car accident two people killed and injured, compulsory insurance proportionate distribution
(e) unauthorized sale of end-of-life vehicles caused by accidents are also responsible
(f) insurance policy is not signed, the format of the terms and conditions are not exempt from liability
(g) changes in the scene of the difficult to determine the responsibility of the court ruling to confirm
(h) the owner did not buy the Compulsory insurance is responsible for accidents
(ix) "Used car" policy approved after the accident, the insurer agreed to renew the policy should be compensated
(x) lost license plate is not declared, the accident is responsible for
(xi) driving without a license in an accident, the insurance company should be compensated for
(l) Test driver driving a vehicle not delivered to the buyer of the accident, the car company was held liable for compensation
(xiii) company employees disabled in traffic accidents were dismissed, the court increased the disability compensation
(xiv) unauthorized driving accidents, the owner of the car is at fault and share the responsibility
(xv) the passenger fell out of the car and was injured triggered by the dispute over the compensation of the insurance company, the court ruled that the insurance company should be compensated for the loss of
(xv) the passengers fell out of the car and was injured, the court ruled that the insurance company should be compensated for the loss of
(p)(xvi) insurance company refused to pay the claim, inform the unknown judgment to pay
(xvii) after the car accident signed a one-time compensation agreement is legal, the parties shall not unilaterally renege
(xviii) the front end of the car license plate is different, the death of another person together with the responsibility, the driver, the owner of the car and the front end of the car belongs to the insurance company was awarded compensation
(xix) Xiamen, final hearing of the personal injury compensation case, migrant workers according to the urban residents of the city, and the insurance company was awarded compensation Compensation case, migrant workers according to the standard of urban residents were compensated 500,000
(xx)Vehicle overloading crushed viaducts, three drivers were sentenced to imprisonment and pay huge amounts of compensation
(xxi)Purchase of second-hand car without transfer on the road accident, the court found that the insurance company in the insurance coverage of the claim
(xxii)Highway sunshine wheat triggered accidents, the management of the department of dereliction of duty to be held accountable
(xxiii)Highway sunshine wheat triggered accidents, the management of the department of dereliction of duty to be held accountable
(xxiii)Special vehicles should also comply with traffic regulations to ensure safety, ambulance accidents were held liable for compensation
(xxiv)Traffic accidents, fetal death, mental comfort support
(xxv)Out of the good intentions of the same car, the driver of the accident is responsible for it
(xxvi)Father died in a car accident, the surviving son's claim for alimony support
(xxviii) ) Serious injuries in a traffic accident, secondary epilepsy was renewed compensation
(xxviii) car accident caused a pregnant woman to give birth prematurely, the court found that the death of the newborn should be compensated
(xxix) Wedding car driver traffic collision, the owner of the car jointly and severally liable
(xxx) Costs in excess of the traffic insurance, the distribution of the compensation amount according to the ratio of the
(xxxi) father "Unlicensed" driving killed his son, the mother sued the insurance company was compensated
(32)Vehicle insurance changes during the period of insurance, the insurance company shall be liable for the insurance
(33)Accident responsibility can not be said, the insurance company to be compensated
(34)The highway placed bricks, poor management
(35) Injuries not yet healed, forcibly discharged from the hospital, the expansion of the loss of their own share
(36) License does not match the driving accident, the insurance company can refuse to pay
(37) Drivers due to the car accident, the owner of the car negligence is also share of the responsibility
(38) Drivers indiscriminate parking, the passengers open the door with the cuts of the pedestrians, the three-way share of the responsibility after the cuts of the responsibility
( The insurance company is not responsible for compulsory insurance for the accident without actually hitting the person--Changzhou Intermediate Court of Jiangsu Province to change the judgment of Li Huarong, etc. v. Insurance Company and other personal injury compensation for traffic accidents
(40) Four migrant workers were killed in a car accident, according to the standard of compensation for urban residents
(41) Emergency insurance in the road Traffic accident personal injury compensation case in the application of
(42) Henan "1-21" traffic accident case civil part of the first trial verdict, six defendants compensation for six relatives of the deceased 1.9 million
(43) deduction of 12 points is still driving accident, the insurance company refused to pay compensation has not been supported
( Forty-four death compensation and the dependents of the living expenses of the years of calculation is not legally related - Shanghai First Intermediate Court ruled that Wang Guozhen et al. v. Chen Wei et al. personal injury compensation case
(45) car rollover fall disabled car guests, unpaid ride also have to pay
(46) illegal speed bumps, accidents are also responsible
(45) the car is still driving, but still have 12 points, the insurance company refused to pay compensation was not supported
(46) illegal speed bumps, accident also bears the responsibility
(47)Vehicles sent for repair during the accident, due to the uninsured car owners need to bear the responsibility
(48)Drivers driving drunk and causing injuries, the insurance company is responsible for compensation within the scope of compulsory insurance
(49)Accidents lead to the depreciation of the vehicle, the party should be compensated in accordance with the law
(50)Accidents, although the treatment is complete, the omission of items should still be compensated
(I) Refusal to pay claims for failure to inform, loss of certainty should be compensated
2006
August 2006
Ye Mou signed a property insurance contract with an insurance company for his car, which agreed on a third-party liability insurance of 100,000 yuan. On September 16 of the same year, Ye was on his way to send his colleague Xiao Jin home when he collided with a tricycle, resulting in Xiao Jin's death. After the accident, Ye Mou dialed 110 police, the traffic police, found to be fully responsible for the accident. The court ordered Ye to compensate the victim more than 130,000 yuan. After the Ye Mou will be related to the claim materials to an insurance company, but the insurance company for its failure to timely inform the reason not to claim. In February of this year, Ye Mou sued the court, requiring the insurance company to pay 80,000 yuan of third-party liability insurance compensation.
During the trial, the defendant insurance company argued that according to the content of the insurance policy signed by both parties, Ye should report to the defendant within 48 hours after the accident, otherwise the defendant could not verify the loss of the accident, so the defendant refused to pay the claim.
The court found that, although Ye did not report to the defendant within 48 hours, but it dialed 110 alarm, the accident scene under the control of the traffic police detachment, there is no loss of expansion of the situation; and the loss of the accident has been determined by the effective legal instruments, there is no loss of undeterminable circumstances. Accordingly, the Shanghai songjiang district people's court ruled that the defendant an insurance company to pay the plaintiff Ye mou third party liability insurance compensation of 80,000 yuan. (2008.7.8)
(ii) the insurance contract agreement is unclear, the spiritual loss to get compensation
April 2006, the plaintiff LiuMou will own vehicle in Qingdao branch of the defendant an insurance company to insure the vehicle third-party liability insurance, vehicle liability insurance, vehicle damage insurance, glass breakage insurance and exclusion of special insurance.
January 2007, the insured vehicle traffic accident, resulting in Zhang died on the spot. Traffic accident by the court, the plaintiff Liu compensation for the deceased Zhang's family members of various losses *** counted more than 138,000 yuan. Afterwards, Liu went to the defendant to deal with compensation, the defendant to the plaintiff caused by the loss of 3,000 yuan of spiritual loss, according to the insurance regulations are not in the defendant within the scope of the claim on the grounds of refusal to settle the claim.
Rizhao City, Shandong Province, Donggang District People's Court hearing that the defendant has no evidence to prove that it signed an insurance contract with the plaintiff explicitly agreed to the spiritual loss of the refusal to pay compensation, therefore, the defendant should be compensated for the 3,000 yuan of spiritual loss. May 4, the first instance of the defendant, an insurance company Qingdao Branch, compensation to the plaintiff Liu Mou 138,000 yuan of insurance premiums.
(C) driving without a license to transport garbage hit and killed, the village committee elected to assume responsibility for negligence
June 2007, early one morning, Wang Mou with a lapsed driving license to drive an uninspected tractor transporting garbage, driving to a fork in the road, encountered a motorcycle without a license to drive without a license to turn the corner, the results of the two cars collided, as a result of the helmet did not take a helmet injuries more serious, unfortunately, died. Afterwards, Wang Mou paid part of the deceased's family, and was sentenced to one year in prison. Traffic police department found that the traffic accident wang mou is mainly responsible for, in a secondary responsibility. As Wang is a village committee for the removal of garbage, in September of that year, Yu's family a paper will be Wang and the village committee sued the village committee to the court, the village committee to hire Wang as the reason for the two defendants also need to *** with the compensation for the loss of more than 38
million yuan.
The court, Wang's family of the deceased's compensation requirements only in part of the amount of opinion, while the village committee said they should not be as a defendant, and after the incident, taking into account the situation of the family of the deceased, the village committee has taken the initiative to borrow 70,000 yuan to the family of the deceased, and asked the court to reject the family of the deceased's claims against the village committee.
According to the judge who heard the case, Wang Mou accepts the commission of the village committee, with his tractor for the village committee to clear the garbage, the village committee is regularly paid for the clearing fee, Wang Mou and the village committee between the formation of the contractual relationship. Because the accident occurred in the process of Wang's driving a vehicle with an invalid driver's license to transport garbage, the village committee is negligent in the selection, should bear 30% of the responsibility for compensation.
The judge introduced, contracting generally refers to one party in accordance with the requirements of the other party to complete a certain work to deliver the results of the work, the other party to accept the results of the work and pay remuneration. Contracting and hiring often confused, in judicial practice, generally believe that if there is a control, domination and subordinate relationship between the two sides, by a party to specify the workplace, provide labor tools or equipment, limited to work time, regular payment of labor, the labor provided by the party to receive the labor production and business activities of the part of the employment can be identified, and vice versa, should be identified as a contracting.
The law provides that the contractor in the process of completing the work of the third party damage or cause their own damage, the fixer does not bear the responsibility for compensation. But the fixer of the fixing, instructions or selection of fault, shall bear the corresponding liability. One of the selection of fault, is to designate the author of the selection of the contractor has obvious fault. In this case, the village committee should know in advance whether wang mou driving qualification, but the village committee did not grasp the situation but let wang mou is responsible for the transportation of garbage, resulting in accidents, so the village committee should bear the appropriate liability.
(4) a car accident, two people killed and injured, compulsory insurance proportional distribution
December 22, 2007, the plaintiff Yang Chunmin driving heavy special structure truck in shanghai-hangzhou highway and the defendant ZhengXiaoFeng hired driver ChenYuMu driving a medium-sized van trailing collision, resulting in the plaintiff YangChunMin and its occupants XuKui injury, XuKui after rescue and death. In February 2008, the plaintiff Yang Chunmin and the deceased Xu Kui's family members to the Haining Court, respectively, both require the insurance company in the compulsory liability insurance limits.
The court held that the compensation limit of compulsory insurance refers to the amount of a single accident, and when there are multiple victims, the amount of damage should be allocated proportionally according to their respective losses.
Accordingly, the People's Court of Haining City, Zhejiang Province, on July 21, 2008, ruled that the insurance company should compensate the parties who died and were injured in the same traffic accident on a pro rata basis according to the loss of both within the scope of the compulsory insurance, of which more than 17,000 yuan was compensated to the plaintiff Yang Chunmin, and more than 40,000 yuan was compensated to Xu Kui's relatives. (2008.7.25)
(E) unauthorized sale of end-of-life vehicles caused by the accident is also responsible
March 9, 2007, Jinchuan Township, a farmer Luo Nanhai 4380 yuan price, bought a neighboring village Hong Shanfa unlicensed scrapped tractor. The next day, Luo Nanhai's relative Wang Jibo driving tractor to the "tire plate stone" road, let Luo learn to drive, he was in the passenger seat guidance. Due to improper operation, the tractor line to not far from the left side of the highway into the river, Wang died on the spot, Luo body injured. The traffic police department determined that Luo is fully responsible for the accident.
March 29, Luo and Wang's family reached an agreement, Luo compensation of 39,000 yuan. June 28, Shexian County Court sentenced to six months of imprisonment, suspended for one year for the crime of traffic accident according to the law. October 9, Wang's wife and his two sons to sell the tractor Hong Shanfa sued the court, arguing that the Hong's selling behavior is one of the reasons for the accident, and requesting compensation for the loss of
30% of the total 400 yuan.
30% of the total 40,000 yuan. Hong argued that what he sold was only scrap, and could only be bought and sold with Luo, and there was no causal relationship with the result of the damage claimed by the plaintiff, so he should not bear any responsibility.
Shexian People's Court of Anhui Province, based on the legal provisions of the cause of the force of the indirect combination, the defendant was found to bear 15% of the responsibility of the accident, compensation for the victim's family loss of 18,479.74 yuan.
After the verdict, the defendant appealed. Huangshan city intermediate people's court of final judgment, rejected the appeal, affirmed the original judgment.
In this case, the defendant violated the national mandatory provisions of the end-of-life vehicle recycling, unauthorized sale of end-of-life vehicles, resulting in end-of-life vehicles on the road, objectively to the lives of others and property safety caused by the danger of the defendant's sale of the behavior and the Luo, Wang's *** with the danger of the behavior of the indirect combination of the actual cause of the car wrecked in the occurrence of major traffic accidents, the defendant should therefore bear the corresponding civil liability.
Indirectly combined with the form of tort is *** with a form of tort, refers to the dynamic behavior and static behavior by the combination of the composition, of course, here the dynamic and static is only a relative concept, its reference is the process of damage results. To be more specific, part of the cause of the tort is the active implementation of a certain behavior, the behavior is the result of damage occurs to become possible, is the direct cause of damage occurs.
The case of Luo Nanhai illegal driving is the main reason; another part of the cause of force is to provide the conditions for the occurrence of damage, this cause of force of behavior in violation of the provisions of the relevant legal norms, is the indirect cause of damage, the two together caused the fact of damage. The defendant in this case violated the state council's "end-of-life automobile recycling management measures" article 12 "any unit or individual shall not be end-of-life automobiles sold, gifted or otherwise transferred to non-end-of-life automobile recycling enterprise units or individuals" mandatory provisions. (2008.6.3)
(F) insurance policy is not signed, the form of terms are not exempt
September 5, 2005, the plaintiff for his cab to the defendant, a property insurance company insured vehicle third party liability insurance, the limit of 50,000 yuan. Defendant to the plaintiff collected the relevant premiums, issued to the plaintiff third party liability insurance policy, but the plaintiff himself did not sign the insurance policy. January 31, 2006, the plaintiff hired the driver to drive the cab will be two pedestrians hit and injured after the car fled the scene, the plaintiff was informed of the report and send the car to the traffic police department, the traffic police department that the driver is fully responsible for the plaintiff compensation for the two victims of the cost **** More than 40,000 yuan. After the plaintiff to the defendant claims, the defendant that the insurance vehicle hit-and-run, not insurance responsibility, not compensation.
The court held that the plaintiff and the defendant signed a motor vehicle insurance contract is based on the true meaning of the parties, the insurance contract is valid. The policy on the liability exclusion clause is a form clause, there are about the insurance vehicle hit and run insurance company exempt from compensation. But the plaintiff did not sign the contract, can not prove that the defendant in a reasonable way to draw the plaintiff's attention to the terms and conditions to be explained, so the defendant a property insurance company can not be exempted from the responsibility to pay.
Recently, the people's court of mudanjiang city, heilongjiang province, a property insurance company to pay the plaintiff he dongying insurance indemnity RMB 43185.60 yuan. (2008.5.29)
(7) changes in the scene is difficult to determine responsibility, the court ruled to confirm
January 18, 2006, Zhangjiagang town of jingang Lu Shihua driving a car, will be hit by a pedestrian Zhao. Due to the rain that night, Lu was anxious to send Zhao to the hospital rescue, both sides did not report to the police at the scene. The next day, Lu Shihua reported the accident to Dadi Insurance Company, which insured the car. The accident due to changes in the scene of the accident, the traffic police department could not verify all the facts of the accident, did not make a determination of responsibility. In September of the same year, Zhao filed a lawsuit with the court, requesting Lu Shihua to compensate for the loss. The court held that Lu Shihua was a party to the motor vehicle, in the absence of evidence to prove that Zhao was at fault, should bear full responsibility for compensation, and thus ruled that Lu Shihua compensated Zhao for the economic losses of more than 39,000 yuan. Lu fulfill the obligation to pay compensation to the earth insurance company unsuccessful application for compensation, filed a lawsuit to the court. The insurance company argued that, due to Lu's own reasons, the size of the responsibility could not be confirmed, and asked for re-confirmation of the responsibility and the proportion of the compensation.
The court found that the plaintiff Lu Shihua failed to report the accident to the police after the accident, resulting in changes in the scene, the traffic police did not make a determination of responsibility, but the court can be based on the facts of the case in the trial of the accident responsibility to be recognized. Now the court effective legal documents have been ruled Lu Shihua bear full responsibility for the accident, legal and effective, should be recognized.
Recently, the People's Court of Zhangjiagang City, Jiangsu Province, the first instance judgment of the defendant Dadi Insurance Company to pay the plaintiff Lu Shihua compensation of more than 39,000 yuan. (2008.5.27)
(H) the owner did not buy compulsory insurance accident to be responsible
April 25, 2007 at 19:30 hours, the defendant Ye Changcheng driving Gu Huixin's two-wheeled motorcycle without a license plate "Wuyang WY125" and the plaintiff Huang Jianjun bicycle collision, causing the plaintiff was injured. The plaintiff was injured. The Changshu Public Security Bureau issued a certificate of responsibility, finding that Ye Changcheng was fully responsible for the accident and that Huang Jianjun was not. The judicial appraisal, the plaintiff HuangJianJun due to traffic accidents, the left three ankle fracture, left fibula fracture, his injury has constituted ten degree of disability. After the accident, the defendant gu huixin to the plaintiff paid 10000 yuan.
After the plaintiff will be the perpetrator of the Ye Changcheng and "Wuyang WY125" two-wheeled motorcycle owner Gu Huixin together to the court, claiming compensation for damages. The defendant Gu Huixin argued that Ye Changcheng drove the motorcycle without his consent, so he did not agree to bear the responsibility of the owner. The court found that the owner Gu Huixin did not follow the relevant provisions of the motorcycle registration formalities, and did not follow the provisions of the insurance company to take out compulsory insurance for motor vehicle traffic accident liability insurance, with insurance fault.
On May 27, 2008, the Changshu Municipal People's Court of Jiangsu Province ruled in the first instance that the owner of the vehicle, Gu Huixin, should be responsible for the compensation that should have been borne by the insurance company within the scope of the mandatory insurance, and the defendant, Ye Changcheng, should be responsible for the compensation for the part that exceeded it. (2008.5.27)
(IX) "second-hand car" policy after the accident, the insurer agreed to renew the insurance should be compensated
July 23, 2007, the outsider Han Liangjun (the original owner of the car) for the Su FEW451 santana sedan to the defendant, an insurance company to insure the compulsory insurance for motor vehicle traffic accidents, at the same time, it for the defendant, a compulsory insurance for the insurance company. Liability compulsory insurance, at the same time, the car to the insurance company insured family car insurance (commercial insurance), including motor vehicle damage insurance, third party liability insurance and deductible insurance. The insurance period was from August 5, 2007, 00:00 to August 4, 2008, 24:00 hours. The express notice of the family-owned automobile insurance policy states, "4. The insured vehicle should be notified to this insurer in writing for resale, transfer, gift to others, change of use, etc. and go through the approval procedure." Third-party liability insurance terms of Article 6, motor vehicle damage insurance terms of Article 6, both provide that: the insured motor vehicle transferred to others, not to the insurer for approval procedures, the insurer is not responsible for compensation.
October 9, 2007, Han Liangjun will be the insured vehicle transfer to the plaintiff in this case Huang Qian. The next day, Huangqian driving the car and Zhao Rongxiang driving an electric bicycle collision, resulting in the occupant Wang Xiaohong after rescue efforts. On the 24th of the same month, the traffic police department made a traffic accident certificate, found that the yellow front, Zhao Rongxiang bear equal responsibility for the accident, Wang Xiaohong is not responsible. On February 26 this year, the relevant departments to make a disability assessment, confirming that Zhao Rongxiang pelvic injury is a tenth-degree disability.
The day of the accident, Huang Qian to the defendant insurance company for insurance policy approval procedures, the insurance company on the same day for the compulsory insurance policy, agreed since 2007
October 11, 2007, the insured by Han Liangjun change to Huang Qian. On the same day, Huang Qian to the defendant insurance company to apply for family-owned automobile insurance (commercial insurance) insurance policy approval procedures, the insurance company agreed to change, other conditions remain unchanged. Subsequently, Huang Qian asked the defendant insurance company claims, the insurance company to the insured motor vehicle transfer others, not to the insurance company for the approval of the change procedures for the reason of refusal to compensate, causing disputes.
The judge said that commercial insurance should not be compared to compulsory insurance
The focus of this case is the "second-hand car" did not approve the commercial insurance policy in time, if a traffic accident, the insurance company should bear the responsibility of commercial insurance. In recent years, the implementation of compulsory insurance, the effectiveness of compulsory insurance in judicial practice has been unified, that is, the motor vehicle insurance after compulsory insurance, regardless of vehicle transfer, even if the insurance company did not change the policy, and does not affect the effectiveness of compulsory insurance, the insurance company in any case, according to the insurance contract on the accident of the third party responsibility. Then, the commercial insurance contract can be compared to the compulsory insurance?
The presiding judge held that commercial insurance should not be compared to compulsory insurance. He said, the right of property is a kind of absolute right, has the exclusivity; and the claim is a kind of relative right, has a specific counterparty. Usually, once the contract is formed, between the parties to form a debt relationship, the parties to the contract is also specific. In addition to the law has special provisions, the parties to the insurance contract is also relatively specific. The parties to a commercial insurance contract are the owner of the insured vehicle on one side and the insurance company on the other, and the contract is only valid between these two specific parties. After the owner of the vehicle has changed, the insurance contract is modified by the insurance company, a new contractual relationship is formed between the new owner and the insurance company, and the insurance company assumes responsibility in accordance with the new contract. If the insurance contract has not been approved by the insurance company, the original insurance contract is only valid for the original owner of the vehicle, and the original contract does not naturally produce legal effect on the new owner. Compulsory insurance breaks the original principle of contract relativity, can only be regarded as a special case of the law, should not be special to deduce the general. The law does not make special provisions, should still adhere to the contract of relativity.
"The Chinese people's *** and the State Insurance Law" Article 34 provides: "the transfer of the subject matter of the insurance shall notify the insurer, the insurer agrees to continue to underwrite the contract, according to law. However, except for the contract of insurance for the transportation of goods and the contract otherwise agreed upon." So, the accident did not change the contract according to law, why the court ruled that the insurance company is responsible for it? This essentially involves the legal effect of civil law on the retroactive. In this case, the insurance accident occurred, the plaintiff before the yellow immediately to the defendant insurance company, the defendant received the report and commissioned others to investigate, has known that the insurance vehicle accident. In this case, the defendant still for the plaintiff for the insurance policy approval procedures, and in the insurance policy on the other conditions, should be regarded as it has increased the risk of assessment of recognition, agreed to continue to underwrite, and thus the benefits of the insurance contract has been transferred to the plaintiff with the transfer of insurance vehicles, the defendant should be contractually liable to the plaintiff.
Recently, haian county people's court of jiangsu province, the first instance of a defendant insurance company to compensate the plaintiff HuangQian compulsory insurance claims 60000 yuan, commercial insurance (motor vehicle damage insurance, third party liability insurance and deductible special insurance) claims 105129.86 yuan. (2008.5.27)
(10) lost license plate is not declared, the accident is responsible
November 9, 2007, a license plate number JiG40109 black car and the plaintiff Guo Ze driving a motorcycle in Zhangjiakou City, Qiaoxi District, Xibagang Road, the entrance to Xinhua Street collision, resulting in injuries to the plaintiff, the hit-and-run minivan. The traffic police detachment determined that the car should be held fully responsible for the accident. Zhangjiakou city public security traffic police detachment identified, JiG40109 license plate number is actually red Jinyan CZ212
fire command car all, the vehicle owner of Hebei Yan Xing machinery limited company, but the car has been parked in the warehouse for several years, the owner said that the car license plate do not know when to lose.
The court held that the car number plate is to prove the identity of one of the signs of the vehicle, according to the relevant traffic regulations, the car number plate must be registered with the public security department of the motor vehicle configuration. The defendant Hebei yanxing machinery co., ltd as the car number plate owner has the management obligation of the car number plate, lost should also be declared in a timely manner. Because of its mismanagement, to the car number plate for the vehicle used and on the road, the vehicle involved in a traffic accident escaped, so the liability should be borne by the vehicle number plate owner.
A few days ago, Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province, the People's Court of Qiaoxi District of the case to make a first-instance judgment. The owner of the defendant's license plate compensation for the plaintiff Guo Ze medical expenses, lost wages, etc. *** more than 90,000 yuan.
Extended reading: insurance how to buy, which is good, hand in hand to teach you to avoid the insurance of these "pits"