After studying biological theories for many years I personally believe that the theory of evolution has had a great deal to do with the development of human society. The theory of evolution has been proving itself to be correct since the very beginning of civilization on our planet. And the theory of evolution is the law of nature, not created by Darwin out of thin air, he just found the law of evolution. Human society is not a natural environment but the reasoning is the same. No matter how you interpret it, the nature of evolution is cruel. It's just that now the weak are not so weak that they die, and the bad are not so bad that they are completely eliminated, and it looks as if human society has so much more of a warm and fuzzy feeling than the animal world. And the words of One Laughing Wind Passed are just a straight face to this reality.
I think it, many people look at Darwin's theory of evolution will certainly have a lot of different insights at the same time I also recognize that everyone has their own way of interpreting, I do not deny the content of other online users and even experts of the interpretation. But I would like to say that since if there are so many possibilities for this theory of evolution, either his or mine two possibilities, can not be completely ruled out a smile over the wind or not express the meaning of the premise of the social Darwinist viewpoints, should not be recognized that he is a supporter of social Darwinism, in the preaching of social Darwinist viewpoints. I think Social Darwinism is criticized because mankind tries to play the role of God, destroying the laws of nature and society to define and classify people and select them. The evolutionary development of any species, everything on the entire planet is tied together, and humans cannot and do not replace God.
So I don't think you should come up with a question about whether it is appropriate for said police officer to bring up Darwinian society on the internet, and since the police officer is also a human being, isn't he allowed to express his opinion, and he is correct. I think what you're trying to argue against is that the people's police shouldn't think that bullying in schools is inevitable, and therefore think that One Smile's conclusion is that it's inevitable and doesn't need to be avoided with any effort. Actually, my interpretation of you is also my own speculation, maybe you don't think so, I think you do, which is essentially the same as if you interpreted Ichika's words.