How do you evaluate Hojo?

On the one hand, he is a typical case of sycophancy and party building in academic research, and on the other hand, he is an outspoken old academician. The interesting thing about him is that he didn't do anything when he should have done something, but after he made a name for himself, he spared no effort to do something.

Ho Jo Ma during the Cultural Revolution is very red, although not engaged in scientific research, but all day long to write articles to guide the Chinese Academy of Sciences bigwigs to engage in scientific research, he was not criticized by a few people. After the Cultural Revolution, he shifted, even more red, embracing a certain leader's thighs, busy all day long selling CAS land to the Liu Baji, all sorts of gods have made a lot of money, just academicians and professors wages sometimes can not be issued.

Qian Weichang big brother project in the secretary, shelved now is the director of the office below the level, responsible for political work, coordination of resources, tube miscellaneous affairs. Academic research on nothing, but long sleeves, interpersonal relations this piece of pinch enough, Confucian ancestral neck technology of the excellent successor.

And the well known paper combining quantum mechanics and Jiang's two representatives, it is deserved to be sprayed.

But after he really became an academician, instead, at the age of ninety, he has the mentality of a thirty year old, and spares no effort to say some real, but easy to poke the pain in various occasions, such as the technology gap, traditional Chinese medicine, microchips, and **** the same affluence, and so on. I've seen quite a few interview slices of him, and despite all the accusations against him in the comments, I rather think he's at least on the right side of the fence.

It can only be said that after becoming an academician, he did not live up to the name of academician, poor and elegant, do not want wealth and enjoyment, so old to make use of his spare capacity to do some popularization of science.

All in all, it is a person with mixed merits and faults, who cannot be generalized. In fact, even scientists who are recognized for their scientific achievements are just as complex (such as Oppenheimer, who was recently filmed by Nolan).

Blame on our society to academicians too high (in fact, and the top ten marshals, as some degree is also distributed according to the mountain), so Baijiu academician, He Jo and so such a reputation is difficult to be deputy to the cause of widespread controversy.