The evaluation factors can not be all items across the board
As we all know, different procurement projects, evaluation factors are different. For general-purpose procurement projects, do not have to or do not have to consider too much supplier door-to-door installation, commissioning, training and other factors; and for special-purpose procurement projects such as network equipment, medical equipment, etc., it is possible to consider the supplier door-to-door installation, commissioning, training factors.
Even for the same procurement project, for different purchasers, there may be different procurement requirements, which should have different evaluation factors. For example, in order to cultivate and popularize the computer knowledge of primary and secondary school students, the school as a buyer in the procurement of computers, sometimes to consider whether the supplier can give timely hardware and software maintenance services, etc.; while the government agencies, due to the staff basically have the basic knowledge of computers, generally do not pay attention to or little consideration of the maintenance service factors.
This shows that the evaluation factors will be different for different procurement projects, different procurement objects and have different content. Purchaser or procurement agency in the consideration of bid evaluation factors, to ensure the realization of the procurement of good quality, select the best bidder or trader of the goal, it is necessary to scientifically and reasonably determine a variety of bid evaluation factors, and, before evaluating the bid, shall affect the evaluation of the results of the evaluation of the bid evaluation factors are all determined, and as a bidding documents published to the potential suppliers to enable them to make timely and substantive response to the evaluation factors, the bid evaluation factors, the bid evaluation factors. Evaluation factors to make a substantive response, so that the procurement work more objective and fair, open and transparent.
From the practical point of view, in the normal evaluation of tender activities, generally to consider the evaluation factors are: price, technology, service, performance, financial status, reputation and the degree of response to the bidding documents and so on.
Seeking the best combination of price, technology
After specifying the specific evaluation factors, the next core work is to consider and evaluate each evaluation factor on the evaluation results of the influence of the size, and according to the importance of its ranking, respectively, to give its size of the weight. To play a key role in the factors to focus and prioritize, and give it a higher proportion of the weight, such as the price of the bid; and on the general, less influential factors, it is given a smaller weight. In this way, through the study of the range of weights and sizes of the evaluation factors, is conducive to grasping the focus of the evaluation factors and their audit links, easy to prevent and curb the arbitrariness of the bid evaluation work, and further improve the scientific and seriousness of the bid evaluation work.
1. The scale of consideration of the scope of the quotation factor assignment. In the evaluation factors, the price factor should be one of the most important factors, one of the important purpose of the implementation of the tender procurement is to save procurement funds. In all the evaluation factors, "government procurement of goods and services bidding management approach" only highlights the price of this factor assignment range, and clear price factors of goods accounted for the proportion of the total score between 30% and 60%, services between 10% and 30%. Summarize the practice of most of the tender procurement unit, the price score can be determined in the following ways:
One is to check the government procurement files and other relevant information, where the government tenders the case of the same or similar projects, and the actual results are better, the purchaser and the supplier is more satisfied with the reference to the price score to determine, or to make the appropriate fine-tuning.
The second is not accessible to the relevant data, by analyzing the nature of their projects to determine. Where the nature of the relatively clear, relatively uniform technical standards, the closer to the general project bidding and procurement projects, the higher its price score, is the goods project can be set at 60%, is a service project can be set at 30%. By analogy, the nature of the project is unclear, poor generality and standardization, they are set at 30% (goods items), 10% (service items).
If the nature of the project can still not be determined by analyzing the nature of the project, the combination of two opinions to determine: one is the opinion of the purchaser, the other is the opinion of experts. If the purchaser values its price, that the price score can be set at 60%, while experts believe that the importance of delivery methods and after-sales service, the price score can be set at 40%, then the average of the two can be taken as 50%.
2. Technical standards to be listed separately. In addition to price factors, purchasers consider more may be technical factors and service factors. Technical indicators are extremely important factors in the comprehensive scoring method, each project requires different technical indicators. For general-purpose goods projects, the technical factors can be appropriately small; for technical uncertainty, more complex projects, the technical score appropriately larger, generally between 15% and 30%.
Common technical scoring factors include the following: ISO9001-2000 and other quality system certification, should be noted that shall be in force; whether the quality and technical supervision and other authoritative departments issued by the production license, mainly for boilers, elevators and other special equipment; environmental protection department issued by the environmental pollution inspection reports or test reports, should be noted that must provide Recent testing; whether the goods provided through the 3C mandatory certification, mainly applicable to the national requirements for mandatory certification of computer products, home appliances, etc.; warranty certificates, including "Quality Trustworthy Enterprises", etc.; Information Systems Integration Qualification Certificate, Campus Network Construction License, etc., mainly applicable to the network project; after-sales service Maintenance, whether it is a special maintenance organization, can respond in a timely manner and so on.
For the offer score, technical score are the same difficult to determine the winning candidate this problem, in my opinion, the method of determining the comprehensive scoring method in the weight value of the main factors in the order of precedence, in turn, the corresponding score of the supplier for the high and low ranking, and then determine the winning candidate supplier.
For example, a tender procurement project of the main factors of the weight value of the order is arranged in this way: price 0.32, technology 0.31, after-sales service 0.14, financial status 0.11, 0.1 reputation, performance 0.09, the degree of responsiveness to the bidding documents 0.05, then in the scores and the bidding price, the technical indicators of the same case, can be scored by the after-sales service from high to low Order; if the after-sales service score is again the same, and then by the financial status score from high to low order ...... and so on, from which to determine the successful candidate suppliers.
3. The range of values assigned to general factors. Assignment of financial status, creditworthiness and other factors can generally be placed between 5% -15%. Bidding suppliers are required to provide financial statements (balance sheet, profit and loss account, cash flow statement) and the corresponding financial tables, and with the bidding documents are attached with the corresponding financial indicators, such as the assessment of operating results of the financial indicators: sales margins, cost margins; assessment of solvency indicators: gearing, liquidity ratio.
4. The assignment of some other relevant factors. Some other factors that do not directly affect the quality of the procurement project, generally can be given about 5% of the weight of the score.
Reasonable set of technical indicators to prevent subjective tendency to score
Technical indicators should try to use standard indicators. Many products (commodities) with international standards, national (ministerial) standards, provincial standards, etc., in the bidding documents should be 100% selection of these standard indicators, neither contrary to the fuzzy, not to mention the new, by the bidding and purchasing units to develop their own technical indicators.
Substantive technical indicators should be detailed but can not be selected, non-substantive technical indicators can not be detailed but to facilitate the operation. Such as a unit bidding for the procurement of a number of wooden office furniture, material belongs to the substantive indicators, should be specific and clear nanmu, sandalwood, ash and other types of hardwood, and can not be alone clear ash timber furniture for the bidding for the mandatory wooden furniture, in addition to the hardwood does not belong to the scope of the bidding and procurement; similarly, the origin of the furniture belongs to the non-substantive indicators, can not be specified in detail the scope of the limitations of the purchase for the province, The city and so on.
Changing the scoring of points. Evaluation before the bidding, the current bidding documents in business documents, technical documents and price documents, such as compilation and sealing form into subjective and objective items of the bidding sub-item sealed sub-item sealing report, subjective and objective items of the bidding evaluation scoring by the original unity of playing a unity of remittance into the form of sub-dozen and then remittance of the bid. In the case of business documents and offer documents that are not open to the public, the technical documents are scored separately by the technical jury; for objective items such as business documents and price documents, they are still scored by the economic jury; and the final score is summarized by the economic jury. Technical experts are required to provide detailed reasons for their scores and file them as a basis for future investigation. After the finalization of the bidding, if there is a challenge or complaint, the expert shall give a reasonable explanation of his behavior, including the explanation of the reasons for his scoring. (Jiangsu Province Jianhu County Bidding Management Center)