1. Personal rights: In many countries, keeping pets is one of the basic rights of citizens. Raising the entry threshold for keeping pets may threaten this right.
2. Economic impact: Pet owners usually buy food, toys, medical care and other necessities for their pets, which has created a lot of employment opportunities and economic value for the pet industry. Raising the entry threshold may hinder the development of this industry and affect the economy.
3. Animal welfare: Many people keep pets because they want to provide a good living environment and care for animals. Raising the entry threshold may exclude some caring and responsible people, who are often an important guarantee for animal welfare.
4. Improvement of knowledge and skills: Over time, people's knowledge and skills about keeping pets will be improved. Raising the entry threshold may exclude some people who have made progress in this field, and these people may help promote the progress of the whole industry.
5. Diversity: People's love and choice of pets are varied. Raising the entry threshold may limit people's choice of pets, which may be inconsistent with modern social values that advocate diversity and inclusiveness.
To sum up, not raising the entry threshold for keeping pets is due to the consideration of personal rights, economic impact, animal welfare, knowledge and skills improvement and diversity.
Of course, this does not mean that we should not have any regulatory measures, such as the provisions on the responsibility of pet owners and the supervision of the pet industry. Only when setting these measures, it is necessary to balance the interests of all parties to ensure that both animal welfare and people's rights and interests can be protected.