I personally feel that the specific design services program, belonging to the category of solutions, should be expressed in the bidding technical documents is better. Of course, if the tender documents are not divided into business and technical, is a unified binding, it does not matter. Suggestions can be developed from the following aspects of expression:
1, project overview: project construction background, construction reasons, references, based on the document, based on the national standard, based on the standards. And design ideas and concepts.
2, the current status of the project: how the current status of the project (disguised as highlighting why the project) the site's technical information (such as the state of the hardware, the system functions, etc., highlighting the current status, for the next part of the solution to make a pad for comparison, highlighting the effect of this transformation of this project).
3, the solution (a detailed list of design services program for each stage, stage one 。。。。 Stage two. Stage three 、、、、)
4, training programs (if the design service project has training needs)
5, equipment selection and list (if the hardware equipment or software equipment procurement, a unified description, listing the details of the equipment, technical indicators, hardware information, etc., at a glance)
6, personnel and organizational structure (of the project's participants, and organizational structure) (the project's participants, and organizational structure to explain)
7, the project implementation arrangements (control of the project progress and time plan to explain, such as the time required for the various stages of the project and the specific content of the work)
8, risk identification and security measures (if any)