Everyone knows the breaking news that the first HIV-immune gene-edited baby has been born in China, perhaps in our opinion, is there a need for this experiment to exist? Is he trying for the sake of trying or is it against ethics? I wonder if the scientists have made some attempts at ethics or other reporting before undertaking this project?
We should all know that since the birth of gene editing technology contains a certain ethical controversy, it can be said that by changing the genes to change the course of human beings, it can be said that this is contrary to the ethics, and immunity to AIDS gene-edited babies were born in this experiment in the body of the child to do it is really feasible? Is it unethical? More precisely, is it really necessary?
Even after the birth of the gene-edited AIDS-immune baby, how will the results be tested? How will the success of gene editing be tested? Will it be necessary for the baby to be exposed to AIDS patients to test its success? In that case, is it not against common sense and human feelings? So isn't this a bit of a violation of the law?
Perhaps our scientists do have the cutting-edge knowledge and technology to change human genes for the betterment of mankind, but I would like to point out that there is no way of knowing what effect this change in genes will have on the future, except to say that it really doesn't have any reference value at this point in time.
It is undeniable that gene editing does have some aspects of well-being for human beings, and going on a date for the benefit of mankind will improve human longevity or intelligence, or let the human immune system enhancement, resistance to all diseases, we are so behavior is not the need to look at the will of the people? It's okay to try, but not to get too carried away, don't bury humanity for the sake of the so-called experiments.