A rough analysis of Moonstone, it may not be correct
First of all, the criminals Li Ming and Sun Hongbin in this case constituted the same crime of theft, and it was burglary
Secondly, during the theft, when the owner was chasing his accomplices, Li Ming, who was let loose, used weapons to threaten the owner so that he did not dare to continue chasing his accomplices. This constituted robbery and Li Ming's behavior constituted the crime of robbery
Once again, after the two discovered that the butt of the gun was missing, they went back to look for it. Li Ming immediately shot Zhang when he saw him. This act was not mentioned in the case as being committed by Li and Sun. *Conspiracy, therefore, can be considered to be Li Ming’s personal behavior. Since Li Ming should have known that shooting at others might cause the death of others but still did it, it constituted the crime of intentional homicide
Also, the two borrowed shotguns , and is also suspected of illegally possessing firearms
That is to say: in this case, the defendant Sun Hongbin committed the crime of theft and illegal possession of firearms, and he was sentenced and released for less than five years for the crime of theft, so he belongs to Repeat offenders of theft should be severely punished according to the criminal law
In this case, Li Ming used weapons to help his accomplices escape during the theft, which constituted theft converting into robbery and committed the crime of robbery. At the same time, when he went back to look for the gun butt , shot and killed the victim. Since the theft/robbery of the two has actually been completed, it cannot constitute a continuation of the robbery. Li Ming's behavior should be considered as intentional homicide, and should be the crime of intentional homicide and robbery, and the crime of illegal possession of firearms.