The evaluation of this project is carried out by the comprehensive scoring method, and the final recommendation of the winning candidate is based on the order of the highest and lowest combined scores summarized in the scores of each part, if there is the same maximum score, the winning candidate will be recommended in the order of the offer preference, and if the scores and quotes are the same, the winning candidate will be recommended in the order of the highest and lowest scores of the technical quality scores. There is no guarantee that the bidder with the lowest price will be the successful bidder. The final score of each bidder is the combined score summarizing the scores of each part, and the scores are rounded up to two decimal places when calculating the scores. The main evaluation factors are as follows:
1. Price score (price weighting of 60%, i.e., 60 points)
Price score is calculated uniformly using the low-priced first method, i.e., to meet the requirements of the bidding documents and the lowest bid price bidding price for the evaluation of the benchmark price, the price score is full marks. The price score of other bidders is calculated uniformly in accordance with the following formula:
Tender offer score = (evaluation of the base price / tender offer) × 60% of the price weighting × 100.
2. Technical quality score (weighted 25%, i.e., full score of 25 points)
1) The bid evaluation committee based on the bidding for goods to bidding requirements for the configuration of the technical parameters of the response, and according to the Bidding for the goods of the technical parameters of the positive and negative deviation, the weight of the impact of the performance of the goods to score, hit ★ for each negative deviation deduction of 3 points, and each other negative deviation deduction of 2 points, out of 20 points.
2) The evaluation committee according to the configuration of the bidding products, technical indicators, a comprehensive evaluation of the superiority of the technical level of all products, scored by the judges between 1-3 points.
3) According to the participating bidding equipment brand market awareness, credibility and evaluation of the stability of the performance of the bidding product brand and reflect the scoring 0-2 points.
3. Comprehensive strength points (weight value of 4%, that is, a full score of 4 points): for the evaluation of the bidder's comprehensive strength: mainly based on the bidder to provide persuasive comprehensive strength of the materials, such as: the number of years of business registration, scale, technical personnel, business premises, awards, patents, etc., the strength of the strong scored 4 points, the strength of the strong scored 2 points, and the strength of the general scored 1 point.
4. Bidder's performance points (weighted at 3%, that is, 3 points): evaluation factors are: the size of the market performance of the bidding goods, the bidder's supply record of the merits and demerits, etc. (in order to the bidder in the bidding documents provided by the domestic more than five written evidence of users of the brand as the main basis, including: procurement contracts, acceptance reports, contact telephone numbers, etc.).
5. Technical training commitment (weighted at 4%, that is, 4 points): According to the feasibility and reasonableness of the technical training commitment provided by the bidders, good 4 points, better 2 points, general 1 point, did not provide any technical training commitment to this item scores 0 points.
6. After-sales service points (weighted 4%, that is, 4 points)
1) complete response to the bidding documents of the after-sales service requirements of 2 points, does not respond to the requirements of the bidding documents do not score.
2)Provide better after-sales service conditions than required by the bidding documents to add 0-2 points as appropriate. (Provide better than the tender documents require after-sales service commitment, the bidder needs to provide persuasive materials to prove)