Because the old lady fell because she helped the battery car, so as the owner of the electric car is liable to pay compensation to it.
What happened
Home in Hangzhou, a neighborhood of more than ninety years of age, the old man, out on the road back to exercise, feel too tired, a little bit of walking, want to take a break, and the front of the just parked a battery car, the old lady reached out to the battery car, want to lean on the battery car. The company's website is a great place to find out more about the company's services.
Who would have thought that the accident happened, just in the moment the old lady help on the battery car, the battery car fell down, and the old lady was brought, and is face to the ground, the fall is still more serious.
After being found by the old lady's family, on the old lady to the hospital, after checking the old lady's leg curvature, facial body body there are still multiple injuries, therefore, the required medical expenses are still relatively expensive. Therefore, the old lady's family to the battery car owner to ask for compensation for medical expenses.
Battery car owner refused to compensate for the medical expenses
For the old lady's family's request, the owner of the battery car is refused, think their battery car well parked on the side of the road, and did not affect the old man's walk and the passage of passing vehicles.
But the old lady's family didn't think so, and felt that the owner of the battery car didn't park the battery car in the designated location, if the owner of the battery car didn't park the battery car indiscriminately, the old lady wouldn't have such an accident.
Anyway, at present, both families have their own sayings and have not reached a unanimous decision, anyway, they all think they have a point.
For this incident, I think the owner of the battery car should pay some hospital expenses. Why? I think there are three reasons:
Reason 1: the battery car is not parked in the designated location
If the owner of the battery car is not parked on the side of the road, the old lady will not think of helping, so that the old lady will not fall, after all, ninety years old, can not afford to fall so.
Rationale 2: The battery car may not be stopped
Generally speaking, the placement of a stable battery car, will not be the old lady so much as a help on the fall, then, obviously is the battery car itself is not stopped. That's why the old lady was so unlucky to fall down as soon as she was helped.
Rationale 3: The battery car is the battery car owner's
In any case, the old lady fell down because of the battery car, and the battery car just happened to be a homeowner in the neighborhood, who made him unlucky, just the old lady helped your battery car? Therefore, the old lady out of such a situation, the battery car owner also has some responsibility.
In summary, this is why I think the owner of the battery car should be compensated for the medical expenses of the reason, although do not have to pay all the medical expenses, but half of the medical expenses still need to be compensated.