The inspection team talk generally ask what

The inspection team talk is an important part of the inspection work, its purpose is to understand the situation and problems of the inspected unit, to promote the work of the inspected unit and the construction of the party breeze and clean government. In the course of the conversation, the inspection team will usually ask questions about:

The implementation of the central government and provincial and municipal important decisions and deployments. The inspection team will ask whether the inspected unit is conscientiously fulfilling its duties and completing its work tasks in accordance with the decisions and deployments of the central government, the province and the city.

Comprehensive and strict governance of the Party. The inspection team will ask whether the party organization of the inspected unit fulfills the main responsibility of party management, whether the main person in charge fulfills the responsibility of the "first responsible person", whether the members of the leadership team fulfills the responsibility of the "one post, two responsibilities", and whether it plans, deploys, checks, and implements the work of the comprehensively strict party management with the business work, and puts it into practice in accordance with the central and provincial decisions and deployments.

Party building work. The inspection team will ask the inspected unit about the construction of the party organization, the construction of the cadres and the construction of the group organizations, and understand the secretary of the party organization to carry out the responsibility of party building.

Democratic centralism implementation. The inspection team will ask the leadership team of the inspected unit about its decision-making in major matters, appointment and dismissal of important cadres, investment decisions on major projects, and the use of large sums of money, etc. The team will also find out whether members of the team have fully expressed their opinions when discussing and deciding on issues, and whether they have made collective decisions in accordance with the provisions of the "three major issues".

Implementation of the spirit of the eight provisions of the Central Committee and the relevant provincial and municipal regulations. The inspection team will pay attention to whether the inspected unit has violated the rules in the areas of official reception, management of public vehicles and issuance of allowances, and find out whether the unit has formalism and bureaucracy in the area of style construction.

Corruption and self-discipline of leading cadres. The inspection team will ask the inspected unit's leading cadres whether there are violations of accepting gifts and gratuities, violations of eating and drinking at public expense, and violations of organizing weddings and funerals, etc., to understand the situation of leading cadres in the area of cleanliness and self-discipline.

Problems involving the interests of the masses. The inspection team will focus on whether the inspected unit has violated the law on issues involving the interests of the masses, such as housing expropriation, land acquisition, education and medical care.

Cases of the inspection team's conversation:

Case 1: A municipal inspection team, while inspecting a state-owned enterprise, found that the enterprise had some problems with project management, such as lagging behind in the progress of the project, overspending on the budget, and the quality of the project was not up to standard.

During the conversation, the inspection team, by asking members of the enterprise's leadership team and project leaders, learned that the reason behind these problems was the existence of some leading cadres who intervened in project management in violation of the law, which led to chaotic management of the project and prevented it from advancing effectively. The inspection team made this issue a priority and asked the enterprise to rectify the situation and hold the relevant personnel accountable.

Case 2: When a county inspection team inspected a grassroots health center, it found that there were some irregularities in the procurement of medical equipment, such as the illegal procurement of high-priced medical equipment and the illegal procurement of non-essential medical equipment.

During the conversation, the inspection team, by asking members of the leadership team of the health center and the heads of the relevant sections, learned that the reason behind these problems was the existence of self-interested concepts of some leading cadres, who illegally intervened in the decision-making process of medical equipment procurement. The inspection team made this issue a priority and asked the health center to rectify the situation and hold the relevant personnel accountable.

Case 3: When a city inspection team inspected a government department, it found that the department had some problems in administrative approval, such as cumbersome approval process and long approval time. In the course of the conversation, the inspection team, by asking members of the leadership team of the department and the relevant section chiefs, learned that the reason behind these problems is that some staff members are shirking their responsibilities and not acting, resulting in a poor approval process and excessively long approval time. The inspection team made this issue a priority and asked the department to rectify the situation and hold the relevant personnel accountable.