(1) Determination of the baseline survey method of assessment
(2) Comparative analysis method
The comparative analysis method refers to the comparative analysis of the social impacts of the with-project situation and the without-project situation. The project situation minus the no-project situation at the same moment is the social impact due to the construction of the project.
(3) Logical Framework Analysis
Logical Framework Analysis (LFA) is a method of design, planning and evaluation developed and used by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) in 1970. It is now used by two-thirds of international organizations as a method for planning, managing and evaluating aid projects.
This method starts from identifying the core problem to be solved, expanding upward step by step to get its impact and consequences, and then deducing downward step by step to find out its causes to get the so-called "problem tree". The problem tree will be converted, i.e. the causal relationship described in the problem tree will be converted into the corresponding means-goal relationship, and the so-called goal tree will be obtained. After the goal tree is obtained, further work is done through the "planning matrix"
(4) Comprehensive Analysis and Evaluation Method
When analyzing the social feasibility of a project, it is usually necessary to consider the social factors of the project and the degree of achievement of the goals. For this kind of multi-objective evaluation decision-making problems, usually choose multi-objective decision-making scientific methods, such as: Delphi method, matrix analysis, hierarchical analysis, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, data envelopment analysis method and so on.
Social evaluation of the comprehensive analysis of the conclusions can not be applied alone, must be considered in conjunction with the project's social adaptability analysis. Mutual adaptability analysis of the project and the community to study how to take measures to make the project and the community to adapt to each other, in order to achieve better investment results. Therefore, after the comprehensive analysis and evaluation to arrive at the total score of the project's social evaluation, in the program comparison, in addition to looking at the total score high and low, but also to look at the difficulty of the implementation of the measures of the program and the cost required and the size of the risk situation, in order to come up with the advantages and disadvantages of the social feasibility of the program. Some projects may change their programs due to the high social risk of the program or the large number of damaged people and the difficulty of mitigating them. For the social evaluation of the project, multi-objective analysis of the results of the comprehensive evaluation method, often only as a kind of analytical summary of the reference data, can not be based on decision-making.