You said your company has equipment, what kind of equipment? If it is XRF, don't worry about the insufficiency of the sample, XRF has very low requirements for the sample, it doesn't need to have several grams of content, and even the smallest parts can be done. If it's ICP and GC-MS, I don't think it's necessary to be very harsh on the average value. It's very simple, even you professional manufacturers can't take apart and put together what you can't find, where will the EU find it? Then there is the EU has a disclaimer, as long as there is a formal test methods and records, and ISO9001 and the same suppliers and process management system, even if there is a problem will not be penalized, these can be consulted with the third-party testing organizations, they know, if you say that there is no is to fool you.
The above is the case of direct export, if you are indirect export, that is to say, is the customer's requirements for you, then you do not have to worry, you can not split so much mean value, he also can not split. If he has to ask you to produce a report, just do the raw materials, raw material manufacturers certainly have enough things for you to do the test. If the customer is still fault-finding, you will do a good job of the system, or go to do a system certification, called QC080000, which includes RoHS. and then to your suppliers to mention your customers to you the same requirements 。。。。。。
To be clear, RoHS has now been upgraded to system management rather than chemical testing alone, unless you do the testing on every batch of material, but that costs more. If you don't want to do system management, it's better to combine XRF with ICP, it's more efficient and less costly.