I. Strengthen the study and publicity of government procurement regulations.
September 11, 2004 implementation of the "government procurement of goods and services bidding and tendering management approach", but also on how to define the abolition of the bid to make a number of more detailed provisions. As the parties involved in government procurement, if, we can strengthen the study and publicity of these government procurement laws and regulations, will be from the ideological importance of bidding and procurement, enhance the awareness of the prevention of waste of bidding, will be familiar with which links are prone to waste of bidding, which links should be operated with caution, so as not to artificially waste of bidding, so strengthen the study of government procurement laws and regulations and publicity, should be a moment to adhere to the A task, especially before each bid opening, the centralized purchasing agency to organize the purchaser and the bidding suppliers to learn the above laws and regulations, and should pay attention to some of the details of the problem to emphasize that it is very necessary, which is equal to the parties to the procurement to prevent the abolition of the bidding, injected a dose of "preventive medicine".
Two, standardize the release of tender information.
This is to ensure that suppliers who meet the professional conditions can fully participate in the bidding, so that no fewer than three suppliers to meet the bidding conditions of the necessary means. Conceivably, only in a designated news media, or in centralized purchasing agencies in front of the bulletin board on the release of bidding information, it is difficult to let all the suppliers who meet the professional conditions to grasp the bidding information in a timely manner, therefore, standardize the release of bidding information is also an important aspect of the source to prevent the abolition of the bid.
This requires, first, to standardize the number of local financial departments designated by the government procurement information dissemination media, should be provided to reach three (including three) or more, as soon as possible to change only one or two designated government procurement information dissemination media, so that the phenomenon of information dissemination is not sufficient; Second, to overcome the problem of improper dissemination of tender information.
In reality, there are still many bidding and purchasing units that all bidding information must only be published in the same level of the financial sector designated government procurement news media, which is one-sided. In practice, many bidding and purchasing units forget the above provisions and only publish pre-qualification announcements on the information dissemination media designated at the local level; thirdly, it should be stipulated that any local bidding announcements of large amounts (generally referring to more than 5 million yuan) must also be published on the information dissemination media designated by the Ministry of Finance such as the China Government Procurement Network, so as to improve the coverage of the information dissemination of government procurement and to ensure that some special items of the Tendering and procurement can meet the statutory condition that there are no less than three suppliers who meet the professional conditions or who respond substantively to the tender documents. Four to ensure that from the date of the start of the issuance of bidding documents to the date of the deadline for bidders to submit bidding documents, shall not be less than twenty days.
Third, careful production of tender documents.
Practice tells us that as long as the bidding documents do not meet the requirements of the "Government Procurement Law" and "Management Measures", it is easy to affect the procurement of fair violations of the law, violations, it is easy to meet the professional conditions of the suppliers or the bidding documents to make a substantial response to the suppliers less than three. For example, many facts have proved that, as long as the bidding documents clear evaluation method or evaluation criteria are not specific, inappropriate, will be mixed up to the point of being declared annulled in accordance with the law.
Therefore, careful production of tender documents is very necessary. Is in the actual production to do "not miss", "not coarse", "not bad". In the "no leakage", to avoid omitting the instructions to bidders (including sealing, signing, stamping requirements, etc.) of the expression, to avoid omitting the requirements of the tender offer (including the amount of the bid security and payment), the main terms of the contract and the contract signing method, delivery and provision of services such as time, to avoid omitting the expression of the financial sector at or above the provincial level. Avoid the omission of other matters specified by the financial departments at or above the provincial level. In the "not coarse", that is, to specify in detail the bidder should be handed over a variety of information, such as the type and name of the certificate of creditworthiness; specify in detail the technical specifications, requirements and quantities, including specific annexes, drawings, etc.; specify in detail the substantive requirements and conditions of the bidding documents. In terms of "not bad", it is to ensure that the production of paper bidding documents and electronic bidding documents issued on the designated network media should be consistent, the technical standards set out in the bidding documents should be in line with the national mandatory standards, and the explicit abolition of bidding provisions should not exceed the scope of the Government Procurement Law and the Administrative Measures and other laws and regulations. The scope of the provisions of the Government Procurement Law and the Administrative Measures and other laws and regulations.
Four, carefully prepare the tender.
"Government Procurement Law", "Bidding and Tendering Law", "Management Measures" and other laws and regulations provide that the bidding documents (hereinafter referred to as tender) shall respond to the substantive requirements and conditions set forth in the bidding documents. This means that all participating bidders, if we are clear on the substantive requirements and conditions specified in the bidding documents failed to respond to all, you missed this one, he missed which one, it is possible to make a substantive response to meet the professional conditions of less than three suppliers, resulting in the abolition of the tender. This requires that bidders must be carefully prepared, to not be sloppy.
In addition to the substantive requirements and conditions required by the tender documents to respond to all, one can not be omitted, but also must pay attention to two aspects:
On the one hand, the "bidding instructions" do not get it wrong, get it wrong is invalid, if we are invalid, not a waste of bidding. For example, a bidding documents require bidders in the bidding documents in the last three years, "successful transaction record", the results of the bidding of five suppliers in line with the professional conditions of three will be "nearly three years", only to provide a "successful transaction record", the result is that the bidding of five suppliers in line with the professional conditions of three will be "nearly three years", only to provide a "successful transaction record". Transaction record", the results of this tender into a waste of bidding;
On the other hand, "small items" is not careless. Such as not signing and sealing each page of the tender, or not signing and sealing next to all the summary bid, or not put the power of attorney in the tender, or the tenderer to fill in the name of the legal person and the certificate of registration of the legal person's name is not consistent, will be "wang yuyu" wrongly written "wang yu sha "etc., the result also caused the abolition of the bid. Therefore, in the preparation of tenders to repeatedly study the tender documents, the preparation of government procurement regulations and tender documents against the requirements of the preparation of a careful preparation, the tender is made to carefully proofread, foolproof and then cast, otherwise it may lead to total loss.
Fifth, carefully calculated procurement budget.
In accordance with the provisions of the Government Procurement Law, when the bidder's offer are more than the procurement budget, the purchaser can not pay, it should be abolished. This reminds us that the measurement of the procurement budget, neither can "lose the head to the tail", nor can not leave room for error, must be carefully calculated. First of all, the measurement of the procurement budget to be considered in a comprehensive manner, with an eye to the whole process of the procurement project measurement, must not be purchased project transportation costs, installation costs, commissioning costs, etc., all or part of the free after-sales service in the supplier's trust; Secondly, the budget price can not be too far below the market price. The budget price should be set at the starting point of high quality and good price, and must not be set at the starting point of the budget price of low price; again, to prepare sufficient procurement funds to prevent changes in market conditions. On the one hand, when applying for funds to the financial sector, we must first seek the advice of the centralized purchasing agency, so that the amount of procurement funds is more accurate, on the other hand, the unit should also be prepared to a certain amount of its own funds, so that no matter how much change in the market situation can ensure that there will be no buyers can not pay for the situation.
Sixth, the strict implementation of the tender procurement procedures.
Because the "Government Procurement Law" and other laws and regulations clearly stipulate that when there is an impact on the procurement of fair violations of the law, violations, should be abolished, and in the practice of government procurement, the impact of the procurement of fair violations of the law, violations, most of the bidding and purchasing procedures in the various channels, and many of them are due to the implementation of the relevant procedural requirements, be caused by the loopholes.
These provisions are not implemented, in summary, mainly in the following areas: in the bidding procedures, bidding and procurement units are not based on the needs of the bidding documents to consult the experts or suppliers; not for the bidding for the special circumstances of the procurement project, the organization of potential bidders on-site inspection or to convene a pre-opening of the Q&A session, and the implementation of the bidding shall not be organized separately or separately only a bidder to attend The provisions of the site visit; the necessary clarification or modification of the issued bidding documents, not fifteen days before the deadline for submission of bidding documents, notify in writing all the recipients of the bidding documents.
In the bidding procedure, one case is that the bidders failed to implement the provisions of "shall not collude with each other to bid, shall not prevent other bidders from competing openly, and shall not jeopardize the lawful rights and interests of other bidders", to engage in "small actions"; another case is to bid in the form of a consortium, the consortium shall not participate in the site visit. Another case is in the form of consortium bidding, the consortium parties have not signed the required *** with the bidding agreement, or not clearly agreed in detail the work undertaken by the consortium parties and the corresponding responsibilities.
In the bid-opening procedure, the bid opening shall be carried out publicly at the same time as the deadline for submission of bidding documents as determined in the bidding documents, and the place of bid opening shall be the pre-determined place in the bidding documents; the bid opening process shall be carried out by the bidding and purchasing unit shall designate a person responsible for the record, and archived for the record provisions. In the bid evaluation procedure, the provisions that the preliminary examination shall be divided into qualification and conformity checks have not been implemented; the written form in which bidders are required to make the necessary clarifications has not been implemented, and the provisions that they shall be signed by the experts of the bid evaluation committee have not been implemented; the procurement agency has not implemented the provision that the bid evaluation report shall be sent to the purchaser within five working days after the conclusion of the evaluation of the bids; and the bidding and purchasing unit has not conscientiously implemented the provisions that it shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the evaluation of bids shall be carried out in strict confidentiality. Therefore, it is necessary to strictly implement these bidding and procurement procedures, in order to prevent the abolition of the bid to build a "firewall".