As someone who has been taking minutes for a long time, I might be able to answer this question.
First of all, we have to realize one thing, the process of taking minutes is a process of de-cluttering, you certainly don't have to record every word, but you need to record the most central points in the meeting.
Normal every meeting is to reach a **** knowledge on a certain topic, then in the process of discussion there will be a process of exploration of all parties, and perhaps there will be disputes.
Minutes of the meeting do not need to be a complete record of the process, but must note the final **** knowledge.
This *** knowledge is required to follow up later work, is the most important results of the meeting.
If the meeting was just an ordinary problem-solving or ****ing meeting, it would be enough to write down the resolutions that came out of the meeting.
But if it's a conversation, a presentation, and you're going to output a public article or something else about that conversation.
Then you need to record the best part of the whole conversation or speech, including the ideas involved or the golden sentences used by both sides of the conversation.
If possible, you can draw a mind map on the spot, and use it to organize the content framework of the conversation.
When you have a clear idea, the complete article you spend time to output later will seem to be very organized, and will not have the feeling of logical confusion.
Summarizing, efficient meeting minutes is a process of combing while recording, in the process of recording the important thing is to sort out the pulse, rather than verbatim record every sentence.
You must use your own judgment to find the core point that the expresser is trying to make, which is a brain process, not a hands-on process.
Satisfied with the answer, you can pay attention to my public number of the same name: clang mom said the workplace (ID: jzwz100218) more workplace dry goods so that you can quickly energize the value of the workplace to become a small red oh.