When hospitals do organ transplants, the allocation of organs becomes an inevitable dilemma. Should we recognize people, or money?
First, from the point of view of doctors and hospitals
In organ transplantation, "organs" are a kind of scarce resources, and who would donate their own organs as a last resort! Doctors and hospitals have to make the right choice between life and death, and they have the power of life and death.
If you were a doctor, what choice would you make? Perhaps you would say that organs should be allocated to people, not to money, and not to the highest bidder.
The only criterion you have to choose from is the person who has a good chance of surviving the surgery. Those who can survive are meaningful to you, and you have accumulated both successful experience and pathological data, which are convenient for you to observe, track, and analyze later to complete your own scientific research.
The success of the surgery is not only in the continuation of the patient's life, but also brings great fame to the doctor and the hospital.
If you are a doctor you determine that the allocation of organs should recognize money, should be based on the criterion of the highest bidder, and should not recognize people.
Then doctors and hospitals get the most bang for their buck, whoever bids the highest gets the organ, who gets the save, who gets the life. Then those who do not have the money to need organ transplants to save the patient, can only be the eyes of the dead, in a just to money as the standard of measurement of society is so cruel cold.
Hospitals with more money can buy more professional equipment equipment can be better to provide services to patients; doctors with more money will have a higher motivation will be more willing to spend time to spend energy to improve their professional skills, the doctor has a better skill can save the lives of more rich people, which is the two do not lose the sale of the two ends have earned the sale. This is not a good idea.
Second, from the patient's value of choice
Hospitals do organ transplant surgery, if the patient's value from the choice of words we should first consider which kind of patient more need to be rescued, more worthy of rescuing, after all, the resources are limited, and can not be to the end of a person can not save.
These are the first time I've ever seen an organ transplanted into a patient's body, and I've never seen one before.
If the patient is too sick to have a transplant, it is not worth it, because their condition is not so bad that they need a transplant to live, and the after-effects of transplantation are very big, so we do not advocate transplantation until it is absolutely necessary, no matter what it is or their own best.
If the patient is too sick to do a transplant, it is definitely too late, the chance of success of the operation is too low, and it is impossible to survive from the operating table, which can only be a waste of a good organ. Even if you can get off the operating table alive, the rest of your life will be spent in pain, in a lingering hospital bed, wasting more resources.
There may be those who think that when a hospital does an organ transplant, the organs should be distributed so that whoever offers the highest price gets the donation. Then the donor will be able to get the maximum revenue compensation, the patient can always get the transplanted organ, to be able to live, the doctor and the hospital can also get more commission revenue. It's kind of a multi-party gain, all getting their maximum gain.
What if it's the donor who needs more money to save their loved one? Wouldn't that more money be the timely rain that saved his family's lives? Wouldn't he have to be more grateful to the doctor and that recipient? Wouldn't he have to be more in favor of the allocation of organ transplants to whoever bids the highest?
Third, from the social value of the choice
Hospitals do organ transplants, once whoever offers the highest price can get the organ, then those who have the money in order to live will do everything to buy and sell organs, regardless of whether the origin of the organs is legal or not. And those who need money, whether it is their own or someone else's organs they will take out and sell for money, we have heard a lot of news in order to buy an iphone to sell their own kidneys.
There is such a "romantic" story, a young man to go to another city on business, met a beautiful woman on the train, the two met like a good chat, the train went to the hotel. When he woke up, he found himself naked lying in a large bathtub, a large bathtub full of ice, the left waist there is a just a new suture long cut enclosure.
If a real world really becomes a world that recognizes only money, I don't know how many men and women who are looking forward to a love affair will despair and want to die; those who think of the excitement and shyness of the expectations will also become a sling, strangling not only men and women's hearts, but also the world. If all this were true, all the good genes in mankind would be changed; we would have no expectation, no hope, and we would have no joy. I do not dare to imagine how the later generations of literature and art, film and television works will develop, describing human beings themselves, yi yi everyone.
A world that recognizes only money for money is destined to be a dark world, where human organs are bought and sold at will, where there is no one, where there is no morality, where there is no emotion, where hospitals are turned into slaughterhouses. So, many countries have legislated that human organs should not be bought and sold, but only donated, and the donors can get appropriate compensation and subsidies.
If you're a hospital director, you're going to have to allocate organs to those who are willing to pay a high price for organ transplants. Or would you prefer to allocate organs to those who need them more but have little money?
Blessed to live in this society where technology and medicine are becoming more and more advanced and emotional, happy, hopeful, peaceful, notarized, and long-lived ......