As far as treatment is concerned, of course, foreign enterprises are the best. in 1994, I was in Guangxi, a listed company's treatment is about 12,000 yuan per year, and later in Hubei, a power engineering company, if in the headquarters does not travel, the salary of about 18,000 yuan per year, but the welfare is relatively high, the annual pension, provident fund, medical care of the personal account of about 5,000 yuan. If you are at the construction site, it's about double that (3,000 to 4,000 yuan per month).
The current package at a foreign company is about 80,000-100,000 per year. There is also pension insurance and provident fund etc., commercial medical insurance and co-ordinated medical insurance. Overtime pay is three times the usual. The "four insurance and one pension" is about three times the average in Wuhan.
I was paid 1500 a month when I was in Chutian Laser, and 1800 after the trial period.
Only the officials in SOEs can travel on airplanes and sleep in soft beds, while the bosses in private enterprises can travel on airplanes and sleep in soft beds as long as the bosses agree to do so, and everyone in foreign enterprises can travel on airplanes and sleep in soft beds. The state-owned enterprises when the official can be divided into large houses, the average person divided into small houses, young people do not have a house. Private enterprises and foreign enterprises do not have a house, but the leadership of Chutian Laser and some of the backbone of the house. State-owned enterprises in the holiday year-end points of fruit and oil (procurement of these things are inevitably to fish kickbacks), foreign enterprises rarely points, but there is a year-end bonus (1-2 million).
Two, the intensity of work.
The most exhausting is the private enterprises, the most relaxed is the state-owned enterprises. I have held technical positions (technician, project specialist), secretary to the general manager and management positions in state-owned enterprises (by the way, I am specialized in mechanical engineering). However, technical positions in SOEs are very tiring, the income is also the lowest, but also have to take a lot of responsibility, so there is a lot of pressure. But management positions are very easy. Working in private enterprises as a technical most tired, but also very uncomfortable, a lot of pressure.
Working for a foreign company is not as tiring as I thought. Maybe European companies are a little more humane. I've heard that the labor intensity of Japanese and Korean foreign companies is very high, but I'm not sure, I've just heard about it. The nature of my work requires frequent travel, the general annual working hours of 250 days. The rest of the time, you can take a vacation or arrange your own working hours. The difference between foreign companies is that each person's position is given more power and a lot of freedom. For example, I am doing after-sales service, a person in the field to contribute to all things related to the equipment, including acceptance, equipment handling, on-site hiring, equipment commissioning and so on. When it comes to funding issues, you can generally make your own decisions, as long as the report can be. This is different from most state-owned enterprises. It is very difficult to deal with the expenses of state-owned enterprises. In SOEs and private companies, there is usually "one pen", my SOE has 2000 people, so the boss has to sign a lot of papers every day, which is really tiring. The reluctance to decentralize is probably the biggest difference in management between foreign and private companies.
Third, employee relations.
The relationship between employees of state-owned enterprises is the most complicated. I went into the power engineering company is recruited into, but most people in the power system is relying on the relationship into, or internal children, so the recruitment into the company is often do things, but if there is no relationship or they are not very good at dealing with interpersonal relations, then the chance of promotion is very little. State-owned enterprises busy busy dead, play play dead, just into the company when almost everything to do, almost workers, technicians, quality inspectors things to do, very tired. After a few years you can tell the people who come in after to do it, play by themselves, the beautiful name of the apprentice. But the state-owned enterprises have an advantage, you again bad, no longer capable, no one dares to fire you. Sometimes in order to share the house general workers can break the leader's head. Our SOE manager's head has been broken, because the distribution of housing is unfair.
Private companies and foreign companies are very simple employee relations, there are also hooks and corners, but not as complicated as the state-owned enterprises. Foreign companies have better and simpler employee relations. Every year, they organize family trips and gatherings between employees. When it comes to difficult things, we all help each other, unlike private enterprises, which manage their own business and don't care about others. Both private and foreign companies don't know how much their coworkers earn in a month, at least not in detail.
Fourth, labor unions and employee rights.
The labor union of state-owned enterprises is the most powerful, with a labor union chairman, chief of staff, women's ministers, accountants, recreation ministers, and so on, a whole lot of people, but they are all just taking money and not doing real work of the Lord, and all have relations to that position. It is impossible for such a labor union to defend the interests of the workers, and there is never any negotiation with the leaders for higher wages for the workers. I find it funny to see the General Labor Union asking Walmart to set up a union, it's typical SOE thinking. Wal-Mart said, "We never oppose the workers to set up a union, and if the employees ask for it, the union will definitely support it. This is the way of thinking of foreigners, in fact, the trade union law also stipulates that trade unions must be organized by workers, the boss to organize trade unions, such a trade union can speak for the employees? Walmart actually stops being stupid. Our foreigners here were not accustomed to this Chinese way of thinking when they first arrived in China, and then the leadership slowly became "Chinese" and adapted to the Chinese way of thinking. They realized that the trade unions in China are actually there to serve the companies and to harmonize the conflicts between the companies and the employees.
Most private companies don't have unions. The foreign company I work for has a union, but no full-time staff, and unionization is currently limited to one trip abroad per year. It's hard to fire an employee at a SOE because you have to go through a union congress to fire an employee, and more importantly SOE leaders are afraid of getting into trouble. It is common for private companies to fire employees and for employees to fire private companies. In general, foreign companies in Europe rarely fire employees, unless the business is not going on or really can not adapt to the work. Our company left the company is mostly fired company, only one is the company fired him. Most of the employees who leave the company have three destinations: going abroad, starting a company, or going to a better foreign company. Individuals fired will generally be notified in advance to the individual, let him find a new unit, find and then leave.
V. Training.
The most complete training system of foreign companies, but foreign companies generally will not hire a completely inexperienced graduates, foreign companies are also accustomed to recruiting through headhunters. And once you enter a foreign company, you will often enter the headhunter's list, especially well-known foreign companies, almost everyone will receive a headhunter's phone. For students who have just graduated, state-owned enterprises are the best training base. It is usually difficult for students without work experience to enter foreign companies. It is said that Procter & Gamble hires fresh ones, but such companies are rare.
State-owned enterprises training do not expect to send you specifically to further training of that kind, it is very difficult to give you, that kind of indicator will only be left to the officials and have relations. I want to have training opportunities in the company, I remember a training I went to the leadership, learning a month, back to the information to me, let me self-study, things are still I do, the people angry. State-owned enterprises can give you the best training is: do things. For example, the development of new products or a new project, this kind of thing in the state-owned enterprises, few people are willing to do, because there are risks, but also not much benefit. It doesn't matter if you boldly take state-owned self assets to practice. This can be said to be your best opportunity to practice, where there will not be such a good opportunity. I am in the state-owned enterprises for the first time independently do product design, the first time for the chemical project, the first time for the real estate, these are very exercise, wrong will not go to jail, but the opportunity is rare. Because no matter in the private enterprise or foreign enterprise, you will not have such a good opportunity for you to try the bull's-eye.
Private companies have little training.
Foreign companies have more systematic training, even if you are already familiar with something, you may still have to be trained every year. This training is usually within the company or group of foreign companies, rather than sitting in a classroom and listening to lectures.
Sixth, management.
One of the favorite sayings of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) is "management produces efficiency". This sentence is not wrong, but the state-owned enterprises have misunderstood the meaning of this sentence, the state-owned enterprises to understand this sentence as "good management of workers out of the benefits", or even become "the whole staff out of the benefits. In fact, even the strictest management of employees can not directly produce benefits. The real meaning of this phrase is "managed enterprises produce benefits", not "well-managed employees produce benefits". As a matter of fact, most of China's state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are no longer capable of competing with foreign enterprises, and the profits of monopolized enterprises come from policy support, while the profits of competitive enterprises have been getting lower and lower. Self-recognition shows that the loss of state-owned enterprises in 2005 hit the second highest in history. State-owned enterprises are increasingly moving towards the end of the industrial chain. This is my deep feeling about state-owned enterprises over the years. See the status of state-owned enterprises in Wuhan, let a person feel sad, even the Wu ship, Wu pots and these currently still okay Wu enterprise is actually just have a job to do, their profitability is very poor, I often see me some of the project subcontracted many times before falling into the hands of the Wu ship, the profit can be imagined, just to feed the people.
There are currently two types of foreign companies established in China, one is the use of China's cheap labor and set up export processing plants, and the other is to value the Chinese market and set up enterprises. Most of the latter focus only on sales and service. Such foreign companies don't recruit many employees in China, but they make substantial profits. For example, I know of the Beijing Philips Co., Ltd. has about 100 employees and an output value of about 1 billion, and as for the profits, they are much higher than those of related industries in China. (Here there is a foreign enterprise through the import of foreign companies in the group to raise the cost of parts of the problem here will not go into detail, if deducted maliciously raise the cost of the factors, the profits of foreign enterprises will be higher). Why are the profits of foreign enterprises so high, because of technical barriers. Foreign enterprises have mastered the key technologies, there is no way. These technologies, not imagined so mysterious, many private enterprises in China through various means also mastered, but there are legal barriers. Private enterprises infringe on the patent rights of foreign companies from time to time in the lawsuit.