Forty-fourth health administrative departments should strengthen the review and supervision of the accreditation organization, accreditation plan, accreditation personnel composition, withdrawal system, accreditation procedures, and disciplinary enforcement.
Forty-fifth health administrative departments and their staff in violation of regulations, interfere with the normal assessment work, should be corrected in time; If the consequences are serious, the relevant person in charge and the person directly responsible shall be given administrative sanctions; Those suspected of violating the law and committing crimes shall be handed over to judicial organs for handling according to law.
Forty-sixth review organizations and their staff, review experts in violation of regulations, interfere with the normal review work, the administrative department of health, review organizations shall promptly correct; If the consequences are serious, it will be disqualified from participating in the evaluation work; Those suspected of violating the law and committing crimes shall be handed over to judicial organs for handling according to law.
Forty-seventh hospitals in the process of evaluation in any of the following circumstances, it shall suspend the evaluation:
(a) letters and visits from the masses reflect major violations of laws, regulations and disciplines in the hospital, and provide clear clues, which cannot be investigated and verified during the review period;
(two) in violation of the discipline of bid evaluation, take irregular behavior, affect the fairness and impartiality of bid evaluation experts, and interfere with the work of bid evaluation experts;
(3) Other circumstances stipulated by the provincial health administrative department.
Forty-eighth in any of the following circumstances during the review process, the hospital shall terminate the review and directly determine the review conclusion as unqualified:
(a) providing false assessment information, forging, altering medical records and related files and other fraudulent acts;
(two) letters and visits from the masses reflect major violations of laws, regulations and disciplines in the hospital, and provide clear clues that are verified by verification;
(3) blindly expanding the scale through evaluation, buying equipment indiscriminately, and wasting resources;
(four) there is a "one-vote veto" situation stipulated in the hospital accreditation standards;
(5) Other circumstances stipulated by the provincial health administrative department.
Article 49 If a hospital has any of the following circumstances within the validity period of the grade certificate, the health administrative department shall revoke the original evaluation conclusion, cancel the evaluation instruction and withdraw the certificate and logo:
(a) the hospital has major defects in medical ethics, medical quality and medical safety;
(two) in the process of accepting the review, it is verified that it is fraudulent;
(three) refused to cooperate with the evaluation work;
(4) refusing to participate in counterpart support work or failing to complete counterpart support tasks as required;
(five) did not apply for review in advance in accordance with the provisions of article forty-second of these measures;
(six) other circumstances stipulated by the provincial health administrative department.
Article 50 If the hospital's evaluation conclusion is unqualified, the health administrative department shall give or advise its superior competent department to give administrative or disciplinary sanctions to the legal representative or principal responsible person of the hospital according to law.
Article 51 The administrative department of health shall submit the list of hospitals, evaluation conclusions, evaluation work summary and this year's evaluation work plan to the administrative department of health at a higher level before the end of February each year.