Which is the best civil service interview class, Zhonggong or Huatu? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each?

Personally, I feel that each has its own strengths and weaknesses, and I feel that they are relatively better than the others, but this is purely a personal feeling.

Huatu's interview training is more serious, the traces of set relatively obvious, is to teach the candidates a set of relatively fixed mode to beat the world, so that the interview error rate is relatively small, but to get a high score is not easy; in the public's words, relatively natural, more emphasis on the candidates themselves to summarize their own answer to the question of ideas, of course, some of the basic ways and means or mentioned, but the overall still emphasize the candidates to have their own answer to the question, but the public's opinion is that it is not easy to get a high score, but it is not easy to get a high score. The overall still emphasize candidates to have their own things, so that the candidate's own requirements will be higher, more helpful to fundamentally improve the candidate's ability to cope with the interview.

Now the interview does emphasize the so-called anti-set, the examiner a day to listen to dozens of times the same topic of the answer, if the set of traces is too obvious, then it is easy to cause the examiner's aversion, this can be figured out. So it really came to the interview, or natural better, such as "timely report to the leadership", "after the timely summary" and so on the set of words less to say, a little more real "dry goods "The first thing that you should do is to make sure that you have a good understanding of what you are talking about. Especially those who want to count on the interview to turn the tide of the candidates, especially so, the so-called "highlights" in the interview, sometimes it is the false empty words to the implementation of relatively specific measures. For example, a friend of mine said in the interview to summarize the report in a timely manner, I personally think it's very good: "I will be in the form of a" work log "to encounter problems in the work, the solution to the program as well as some of the ideas of the personal recommendations are complete to record, so that the leadership in the assessment of my work will have a relatively detailed written information as a reference, if one day there are If another colleague takes over my work, then this Journal can also help him to start working better and faster."

If the written test score advantage is more obvious, the bottom of the interview and more general, then you can consider applying for Huatu, peacefully take a middle and upper score, steady finish; if you expect the interview to turn the tables, then the public may be more suitable for some. Of course, this is purely personal opinion, just for reference.

In fact, I think the best way to prepare for the interview is to practice more on your own. I think the best way to prepare for an interview is to practice on your own. Find a few candidates who are going to participate in the interview to do a mock interview together, ask a few young civil servants who have been interviewed in recent years to be mock examiners, if you can ask a government official who has been interviewed to be an examiner, it is better, and every 2-3 days to conduct a mock interview, the topic will be used in the previous questions, a candidate to answer, and then the other candidates to supplement the examiner to then comment on the review. This persists for two or three weeks, can greatly broaden the candidate's mind, very effective.