Nowadays, the film used to take CT scans is gone and turned into a picture. However, these are the results of manufacturers’ hype. As for why, everyone knows
For "Digital imaging - cloud film" has emerged in various places in recent years. This medical device product classification has also been clearly defined: the information provided by the software is not used as the basis for doctors' diagnosis and treatment. The software does not have the function of processing reports and films, and is only for viewing by the patient himself. It is not used as a medical device management or as a basis for clinical diagnosis. The development of cloud film requires standards and specifications.
Internet data service is a large and complex system, including security, reliability, etc., so I won’t go into detail here. Its standards are updated so rapidly that a single manufacturer cannot say anything about it. Done.
Item 117 also stipulates that mobile phone screens cannot be used as hardware for imaging diagnosis. Therefore, if cloud film is used for imaging diagnosis, a professional display screen must be provided. This explanation greatly discounts the originally touted commercial value of cloud film.
To sum up, if we use the original PACS software, qualified Internet data services, and the imaging department is already equipped with a display screen, can we achieve the Internet medical imaging diagnosis function? Of course it is feasible. We don’t need a beautifully packaged “cloud film” at all. Can’t we just make up for whatever is missing?